Heather MacDonald has an interesting piece examining hispanic psychology more deeply than many political operatives go. That whole “family values” thing that open-borders Republicans recite ad nauseum is a myth, or at least a cultural misunderstanding of what is meant.
Hispanics believe that government should supply a “generous safety net” — a polite way of saying they like lots of free stuff from Uncle Sucker. MacDonald explains that family values require government help in the hispanic mind.
As Pew research has noted, hispanics favor big government and continue to do so even after generations of residing in the United States.
So the idea that Mexicans et al are some sort of natural fit with conservatives is just delusional.
It is similarly deranged to think that if Republicans support a mass amnesty for foreign lawbreakers then hispanics will embrace conservative ideas. During Sen McCain’s 2008 candidacy, he promised on Univision that he would work for amnesty starting the first day of his Presidency. For his pledge to undermine American law and sovereignty, McCain got a measly 31 percent of the hispanic vote. Strong enforcement advocate Mitt Romney got 27 percent of hispanics, a difference of only 4 percent.
Sadly, even normally intelligent people like Charles Krauthammer think that amnesty is the magic key to Republican popularity among hispanics. Following is his prescription, from Fox TV on Nov 7:
“I think Republicans can change their position, be a lot more open to actual amnesty with enforcement. Amnesty, everything short of citizenship. And to make a bold change in their policy. Enforcement and then immediately after, a guarantee of amnesty. That would change everything. If you had a Rubio arguing that it would completely up-end all the ethnic alignments.”
What the heck is “amnesty with enforcement” anyway?? That makes no sense.
Krauthamer should rethink his reaction to the election and instead pay close attention to MacDonald’s political and psychological analysis:
Why Hispanics Don’t Vote for Republicans, By Heather Mac Donald, NRO, November 7, 2012
The call for Republicans to discard their opposition to immigration amnesty will grow deafening in the wake of President Obama’s victory. Hispanics supported Obama by a margin of nearly 75 percent to 25 percent, and may have provided important margins in some swing states. If only Republicans relented on their Neanderthal views regarding the immigration rule of law, the message will run, they would release the inner Republican waiting to emerge in the Hispanic population.
If Republicans want to change their stance on immigration, they should do so on the merits, not out of a belief that only immigration policy stands between them and a Republican Hispanic majority. It is not immigration policy that creates the strong bond between Hispanics and the Democratic party, but the core Democratic principles of a more generous safety net, strong government intervention in the economy, and progressive taxation. Hispanics will prove to be even more decisive in the victory of Governor Jerry Brown’s Proposition 30, which raised upper-income taxes and the sales tax, than in the Obama election.
And California is the wave of the future. A March 2011 poll by Moore Information found that Republican economic policies were a stronger turn-off for Hispanic voters in California than Republican positions on illegal immigration. Twenty-nine percent of Hispanic voters were suspicious of the Republican party on class-warfare grounds — “it favors only the rich”; “Republicans are selfish and out for themselves”; “Republicans don’t represent the average person”– compared with 7 percent who objected to Republican immigration stances.
I spoke last year with John Echeveste, founder of the oldest Latino marketing firm in southern California, about Hispanic politics. “What Republicans mean by ‘family values’ and what Hispanics mean are two completely different things,” he said. “We are a very compassionate people, we care about other people and understand that government has a role to play in helping people.”
And a strong reason for that support for big government is that so many Hispanics use government programs. U.S.-born Hispanic households in California use welfare programs at twice the rate of native-born non-Hispanic households. And that is because nearly one-quarter of all Hispanics are poor in California, compared to a little over one-tenth of non-Hispanics. Nearly seven in ten poor children in the state are Hispanic, and one in three Hispanic children is poor, compared to less than one in six non-Hispanic children. One can see that disparity in classrooms across the state, which are chock full of social workers and teachers’ aides trying to boost Hispanic educational performance.
The idea of the “social issues” Hispanic voter is also a mirage. A majority of Hispanics now support gay marriage, a Pew Research Center poll from last month found. The Hispanic out-of-wedlock birth rate is 53 percent, about twice that of whites.
The demographic changes set into motion by official and de facto immigration policy favoring low-skilled over high-skilled immigrants mean that a Republican party that purports to stand for small government and free markets faces an uncertain future.