Along with the conquering comes the idea of Islamic superiority even though their societies are basket cases.
Omar seems to share the attitude of superiority, apparent in her disrespect for western law and culture. Born in Somalia, she lived with her family in a Kenya camp until the US rescued them as refugees in the mid-1990s, although there is evidence she entered by claiming relation to persons who were not her family. She apparently married her brother so he could scam his way into America. After so much generosity, Omar complains about the nation that rescued her and says living here is “an everyday assault.”
She can’t even be bothered to follow the laws of the Congress to which she was elected — unimportant infidel details, she may think.
Tucker Carlson investigated the latest news about Omar which concerns campaign finance violations that may have occurred during her affair with a married consultant:
]]>TUCKER CARLSON: Congressman Ilhan Omar is back in the news again. In newly released divorce papers, a claim has made that she has had a long term affair with a political consultant — her political consultant named Tim Mynett.
A new complaint says Omar’s involvement with Mynett may have violated campaign finance laws. Peter Flaherty is Chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, and he joins us tonight. Peter, thanks very much for coming on.
PETER FLAHERTY: Good evening.
CARLSON: So typically, we don’t jump into people personal lives because, it’s kind of no one’s business, I think. But in this specific case, you have an allegation that a relationship like this could violate the law. How would that work?
FLAHERTY: Well, the problem here is that private actions may have resulted in violations of the law, the Federal Election Campaign Act. And in this case, you have Representative Ilhan Omar’s campaign paying for the travel of a political consultant with which it’s alleged that Representative Omar is having an affair.
Now, that opens the possibility that campaign funds are being used for personal purposes, which is strictly prohibited. And it has ended the careers of many of a politician.
You know, Representative Duncan Hunter, Republican from San Diego, he may be on his way to jail for using campaign funds for personal uses, including facilitating extramarital affairs.
CARLSON: Interesting. So what would you need to show that?
FLAHERTY: Well, we’ve asked for an investigation by the Federal Election Commission. These are violations of Election Law. If they’re willful, it’s possible it could trigger an investigation by the Justice Department and we do hope that takes place.
But in our complaint, we cited two things. Number one, the failure to itemize travel by this consultant named Tim Mynett. The Federal Election Commission regulations are very specific about travel. If you have to report as individual disbursements any amount over $200 in the aggregate, you know, your hotel, your airfare, whatever.
But Omar on a report simply reported lump sum payments to an LLC owned by Mynett, which is a clear violation. Now that sounds technical, and it sounds a little nitpicking, but as an ethics group, we always look for technical violations in hopes of finding out the more serious improper activity that they are calculated to conceal.
CARLSON: Sure. The stuff hangs on technicalities. I mean, that’s what it is. It’s an accumulation of technical violations. So, Omar, in addition to being I would say, ideologically on the wrong side, seems very sleazy.
I mean, every time you press a little bit into her personal life, you can’t get a straight answer. There seems to be quite a bit of deception. That may not even be your real name. She may have married her brother. Then you have this? Has she shed any light on this at all? Has she responded to questions — your questions about it?
FLAHERTY: Well, I understand today that she denied everything. And that was curious to us because the violations about reporting the travel, they are straightforward, unambiguous violations and any election law expert would tell you that.
Now the more serious matter of whether she was having an affair with Tim Mynett, and used campaign funds to facilitate his traveling around the country with her. Well, we can’t state that we know that conclusively. But we’re saying that there’s enough circumstantial evidence for the FEC to launch an investigation, and we hope they do.
CARLSON: We’ll see. Peter Flaherty, thank you very much for joining us tonight.
What is it with MSM scribblers and their failure to remember history? Do they take an Islam-amnesia pill every morning before they [...]]]>
What is it with MSM scribblers and their failure to remember history? Do they take an Islam-amnesia pill every morning before they begin reporting the stories of the day? Islam has declared war on the west and acts accordingly — from 9/11 to recent attacks in France and Germany, but when anyone points out muslims’ open plans for world conquest assisted by islamic immigration (aka hijrah), the press declares them to be a wacko and islamophobe.
Some muslims immigrate to fight for the world caliphate, and they hope to continue what happened on 9/11.
The Post reporter found it odd that a person engaged in communications would plan a film warning the pubic about unfriendly muslims and their aim of one world under Islam.
(Spare video here.)
The Houston Chronicle provided a brief overview of the Post article:
]]>Steve Bannon Film Outline Envisioned ‘Islamic States of America’ In 2007, Houston Chronicle, February 4, 2017
The eight-page outline of Bannon’s film pitch warned of “fundamental clash of civilizations”
Trump strategist Steve Bannon pitched a movie in 2007 in which radical Muslims take over the country and turn it into the “Islamic States of America,” according to a treatment published by The Washington Post on Friday.
The eight-page outline of Bannon’s documentary film pitch warned of a “fundamental clash of civilizations.” According to the Post, the treatment proposes “a three-part movie that would trace ‘the culture of intolerance’ behind sharia law, examine the ‘Fifth Column’ made up of ‘Islamic front groups’ and identify the American enablers paving ‘the road to this unique hell on earth.’”
The outline reads, according to the Post:
“The road to the establishment of an Islamic Republic in the United States starts slowly and subtly with the loss of the will to win. The road to this unique hell on earth is paved with the best intentions from our major institutions. This political/accommodation/appeasement approach is not simply a function of any one individual’s actions but lies at the heart of our most important cultural and political institutions.”
“He actually sees the west in a war with these elements and he’s suggested that Islam in general is not a religion of peace, is something to be fearful of as Christians and as Americans,” Matea Gold, national political reporter for The Post, told MSNBC’s Joy Reid on Friday night.
Gold went on to say Bannon’s outline also mentioned jihadists hiding in plain sight in America, posing as civil rights activists.
“What I think is really fascinating about it is that it did not just focus on the threat of ‘radical Muslims,’ as the outline put it, but it really warned very darkly that Muslim community groups such as CARE were operating essentially as a fifth column, giving a chance for jihadists to sort of hide in our midst. And it warned that major institutions — the Washington Post, the New York Times, the CIA, America Jewish Community — were effectively appeasing some of these elements in society and allowing them to flourish.”
The outline is titled “Destroying the Great Satan: The Rise of Islamic Facism [sic] in America” and details “the rise of a global holy war — financed by the cash flow of oil — to attack and destroy western civilization.” It stresses: “the ideology is scary, and its ideologues will frighten small children as we bring to light an unbroken chain of ‘thinkers’ who epitomize the culture of hate.”
The Washington Post is one among many media outlets that have reported that Bannon had a strong hand in drafting Trump’s executive order last Friday that imposed a temporary ban on travelers from Iraq, Iran, Sudan, Somalia, Syria, Libya and Yemen. The Trump administration asserts that it is not a “Muslim ban,” but rather a target of countries whose citizens pose a threat of terrorist acts.
“Reading this outline 10 years later as this order is now being debated and its motives are being discussed is fascinating,” Gold said. “There’s no question that he is practically without peer in terms of influence in the White House, perhaps only the president’s son-in-law Jared Kushner has more influence and access to Trump.”
Robert Spencer of JihadWatch explains Hijrah this way:
To emigrate in the cause of Allah – that is, to move to a new land in order to bring [...]]]>
Robert Spencer of JihadWatch explains Hijrah this way:
To emigrate in the cause of Allah – that is, to move to a new land in order to bring Islam there, is considered in Islam to be a highly meritorious act. “And whoever emigrates for the cause of Allah will find on the earth many locations and abundance,” says the Qur’an. “And whoever leaves his home as an emigrant to Allah and His Messenger and then death overtakes him, his reward has already become incumbent upon Allah. And Allah is ever Forgiving and Merciful.” (4:100) The exalted status of such emigrants led a British jihad group that won notoriety (and a shutdown by the government) a few years ago for celebrating 9/11 to call itself Al-Muhajiroun: The Emigrants.
Right on cue, a Syrian Muslim spills the beans about his big Islamic plans:
NARRATOR: For most of the refugees, Germany is their main destination. A majority of them flee from the war. Among them are some who have other reasons and goals.
SYRIAN MAN: My main goal for leaving Syria is… to lead people to the acceptance of Islam. If my wish comes true, I will gladly forgo the whole world. For this purpose I would not only sell Syria, but also… my parents, who are more valuable to me than Syria.
I swear by Allah, I only came here for this one goal. But this will be very demanding work for me. And for this reason, I have met with a few men and women who… want to know more about Islam.
I have observed that they are curious and willing… to get to know Islam through us. If someone would convert to Islam through me, whom I teach… so that in return he can bring others to Islam, then I would be one who received the tenet and passed it on and when he converts to Islam to then Islamize others… then I will be rewarded for my and for his work. In that case I do not want to go back to my home country, I only want to go up (into Paradise).
And what if the non-Muslims aren’t interested in joining up? What then, Achmed? Is forced conversion okay, as Islam scriptures suggest?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Europe has already received more than one million illegal aliens this year.
