France Considers the Veiled Threat to Values of the Republic

France has been debating the burqa and whether it fits in French society for some time. Last June, the President drew a line in the cultural sand when he condemned the offensive Islamic garment (Nicolas Sarkozy: burqa not welcome in France).

The BBC item caught my attention because an actual Communist official turned out to be a leader in speaking out against the cloth prison. That’s interesting and unusual since the far left frequently supports Islamic jihad against the West. Many commies must imagine that jihadists won’t head-chop the lefty infidels when their usefulness is over. Dream on.

The photo at the right shows a culture clash of clothing and values in Marseille.

Behind France’s Islamic veil, BBC, April 8, 2010

“Why should we find ourselves returning to medieval traditions?” asks Andre Gerin, the Communist member of parliament who chaired the parliamentary commission.

“To me, the full veil, the covered face, it’s a woman in a portable coffin.”

It was Mr Gerin who first started speaking openly about banning the veil when, as mayor of a suburb of Lyon, he says he noticed more and more women wearing it.

And he is convinced they are doing it at the behest of what he calls fundamentalists.

“These women are controlled,” the MP says. […]

The niqab, says leading feminist philosopher Elizabeth Badinter “is totally contrary to the three principles of the French Republic”.

Those principles – liberty, equality, fraternity – can be seen written or carved on the front of every French town hall.

By hiding your face, Mrs Badinter explains as she sips a small black coffee in her elegant apartment in Paris, you breach the principle of equality.

“She who hides her face is in a position superior to mine,” she says. “She sees me but she refuses to reciprocate.”

Then there is the strongly guarded idea of secularism in France, the absolute separation of religion and the state rooted in the 1789 revolution and enshrined in a century-old law.

“You can have whatever religion you wish,” says Mrs Badinter, “but it stays in the private sphere.”

The problem is that some French Muslims see that not only as a way of dismissing their religion but also of ignoring their presence in France.

It’s interesting to characterize the burqa in terms of violating social reciprocity. The idea is French but insightful nevertheless.

Mexican Immigrants: Feeling Entitled and Bearing Grudges

This thoughtful opinion piece about the cultural danger of admitting millions of Mexicans to America is worth your attention.

Illegal Hispanic immigration is undermining American values, Christian Science Monitor, March 30, 2010

Illegal immigration is causing an influx of Hispanics who don’t embrace American values.

By Walter Rodgers / Santa Barbara, Calif.

Walking the sandy beachfront in this ultra-affluent city, I chanced upon two Hispanic men rummaging through the trash. Startled at the sight, I stared momentarily. One of them yelled at me, “You look now, but in 50 years we will own all this!” Given the tsunami of illegal immigration and the prolific Hispanic birthrate, I responded, “I believe you will.”

US Census statistics suggest the scavenging man was right. California, now about 37 percent Latino, is expected to be majority Hispanic by 2042. A quarter of all Americans will probably be Latino in 40 years.

This trend has worrisome aspects. Imagine a huge, growing Hispanic underclass in America with a grudge, a burning sense of having been victimized by the “gringos.”

I witnessed this grudge up close a few years ago at Texas A&M International University in Laredo. Hispanic students challenged me, claiming any restriction of illegal immigration across the US southern border with Mexico is a violation of Latinos’ human rights.

Me: “Would you try to reenter Spain without a passport?

Students: “Of course not.”

Me: “What about France, or Britain?”

Students: “No.”

Yet many of these illegal Latino immigrants suffer the illusion they are divinely entitled to colonize the US – and not just the states bordering Mexico, but Chicago and the East Coast as well.

Some Hispanics talk openly of a reconquista, an effort to reclaim the American Southwest that once belonged to Mexico.

Historically, this concept is wide of the mark. Most Hispanic ancestors of immigrants owned no land. Their forebears were serfs of the Roman Catholic Church, once the largest landholder in Latin America and the world. Other ancestors labored as landless peons for Spanish colonial landlords who were later relieved of their lands by 19th-century Anglo-Americans.

Historical entitlement is but one of the myths surrounding illegal Hispanic immigration. Gringos have their own fables, such as ultimate assimilation into a greater English-speaking society.

Professor Lawrence Harrison of Tufts University in Medford, Mass., notes that “In California, fourth- and fifth-generation Mexican immigrants are still speaking only Spanish and resisting assimilation.” He says there are serious cultural barriers to the old melting-pot concept. “Words like compromise and dissent, crucial concepts to American democracy, have radically different meanings in Spanish.” Dissent, for example, translates into “heresy.”

Most alarming, today’s influx of poor Latin American immigrants comes from countries less than congenial to democracy, a law-based society, or public education. Many experts look with alarm on the fact that, unlike earlier European and Asian immigrants, the tsunami from the south too often undervalues educating children because many Hispanic parents resent the idea that their children will have more education than they have. In 2000, only 25 percent of working-age male Mexican immigrants had graduated high school, a sad fact that contributes to an increasingly volatile underclass. Continue reading this article