Senators Submit Legislation to Decrease Total Immigration

On Tuesday, Senators Tom Cotton and David Purdue introduced their bill that would end chain migration and the diversity lottery in order to make immigration less harmful to American citizens. As America’s Senator Jeff Sessions has declared, “Immigration should serve the national interest.”

The two senators held a press conference to discuss the legislation. The initial description given by Senator Cotton was direct and well presented:

SENATOR TOM COTTON: Senator Purdue and I are unveiling what we’ve named the RAISE Act which stands for Reforming American Immigration for Strong Employment. The title should give you an idea of why we’re offering this bill. Over the last 40 years we’ve seen a huge increase in immigration. As you can see in this first chart, in the past 25 years alone we’re running an average of one million immigrants per year which is far above historical norm. It’s like adding the population of Montana every year or the population of Arkansas every three years.

As the second chart shows, only one out of every 15 immigrants is coming here for employment reasons. If we really needed all of these people because of their skills, because they help the economy grow, they be coming here on say, an EB-1 or an EB-2 visa, but they’re not. Instead we let them in without consideration of our workforce’s needs. Put those two together and what do you get?

A sharp decline in wages for working Americans, as you can see here. Those with college and professional degrees are doing just fine but those with a high school diploma have seen their wages fall by two percent since 1979 and for those without one, it’s 17 percent. Now, is automation a factor? Is globalization? Sure, but there’s no denying this generation-long surge in low-skilled immigration has hurt blue-collar wages. It’s pulling the rug out from underneath them and unless we reverse this trend, we’re going to create a near-permanent underclass for whom the American Dream is always just out of reach.

Senator Purdue and I think it’s time for our immigration system to start working for American workers. The RAISE Act would help increase wages by returning immigration levels to their historical norms and rebalancing the system toward merit-based immigration. There are three main parts of the bill.

First, we reprioritize immediate family members: we keep immigration preferences for spouses and unmarried minor children of citizens and green card holders but eliminate them for extended relatives like parents, adult siblings and adult children. Second, we eliminate the 50,000 visas and the diversity lottery which is rampant with fraud provides no discernible economic for humanitarian benefits and doesn’t even promote diversity. Third, we limit the number of green cards offered to refugees to 50,000 per year which is in line with historical averages under Presidents Bush and Obama and consistent with President Trump’s recent guidance.

The net effect will be the cut annual immigration in half from 1,000,000 to 500,000 green cards per year. This approach is broadly consistent with past reform measures and it would begin to move us towards a more merit-based system like Canada and Australia have. Most important, it would promote higher wages on which working Americans can build a future whether your family came over on the Mayflower or whether you just took the oath of citizenship.

Continue reading this article

Amazon’s Robot-Run Supermarket Will Need Only Three Workers

Amazon founder Jeff Bezos certainly is the busy little billionaire, as shown by his latest project of an automated supermarket, where technology replaces human workers to save lots of money for the third-richest man in the world.

Does Bezos not understand that destroying jobs is a long-term loser for Amazon’s customer base? When workers are no longer needed to perform workplace tasks, their lost jobs decrease buying power in the economy.

Bezos pioneered the use of robots in his distribution warehouses to move products and process customer orders more rapidly.

The Bezos supermarket operates from the individual shopper’s smart phone, which checks in at the store and keeps track of what the purchaser picks off the shelves. No tiresome checkout line exists, but there’s nobody to help you either. There are no carts to be seen in Amazon’s explanatory video, and the system looks designed for small purchases, like a sandwich or cupcake.

Furthermore, in an economy where human workers are replaced by machines, it’s ridiculous for the government to continue admitting a million-plus immigrants annually: many will end up as recruits for the angry underclass of people who cannot find a job because of technology.

And Jeff Bezos is not the only automation innovator: the business is going gangbusters in Silicon Valley and beyond with major investments in what’s seen as the future technology. Oxford researchers forecast in 2013 that nearly half of American jobs were vulnerable to machine or software replacement within 20 years. Rice University computer scientist Moshe Vardi warns of a dystopian future in 30 years when humans become largely obsolete and world joblessness stands at 50 percent. The Garner tech advising company believes that one-third of jobs will be done by machines by 2025. Forrester Research Inc. has a more optimistic view, that there will be a net job loss of 7 percent by 2025 from automation — but that’s still a serious deficit when more jobs are needed as population increases.

The Post’s article is a pleasant change from much technology reporting — which often gets lost in describing gadget coolness — by focusing on the job loss.

Inside Amazon’s robot-run supermarket that needs just 3 human workers, New York Post, February 5, 2017

If you’re a robot stealing somebody’s job, it’s best to stay hidden.

That’s what Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos appears to be thinking, as his Seattle-based web giant has contemplated a two-story, automated grocery store in which a staff of robots on the floor upstairs grabs and bags items for shoppers below.

The ground level of the futuristic prototype — a supermarket-sized version of its recently unveiled “Amazon Go” convenience store, with a bigger layout that could span anywhere between 10,000 and 40,000 square feet — would be devoted to goods that shoppers typically like to touch, sources briefed on the plans told The Post.

Those could include as many as 4,000 items, spanning fresh fruits and vegetables, eggs, meats and cheeses, and grab-it-and-go stuff like beer and wine, the sources said. Pharmacies might also might spring up at some of the high-tech locations, as Amazon looks to break into the lucrative sector, insiders said.

But for many, the most striking feature of the bigger stores is that they could operate with as few as three employees at a time. Sources said the plans call for staff to max out at 10 workers per location during any given shift.

“Amazon will utilize technology to minimize labor,” a source close to the situation told The Post.

Job-cutting technology isn’t new for Amazon, which has increasingly used robots to automate its distribution warehouses. More recently, it has been pioneering the use of drones to deliver packages instead of humans, and even filing patents for unmanned blimps that would serve as flying warehouses.

In the case of Amazon’s automated retail prototype, a half-dozen workers could staff an average location. A manager’s duties would include signing up customers for the “Amazon Fresh” grocery service. Another worker would restock shelves, and still another two would be stationed at “drive-thru” windows for customers picking up their groceries, fast-food style.

The last pair would work upstairs, helping the robots bag groceries to be sent down to customers on “dumbwaiter”-like conveyors, a source said.

With the bare-bones payroll, the boost to profits could be huge. Indeed, the prototype being discussed calls for operating profit margins north of 20 percent. That compares with an industry average of just 1.7 percent, according to the Food Marketing Institute.

Labor accounts for the lion’s share of a supermarket’s operating costs. In 2015, the industry employed 3.4 million workers nationwide, with an average grocery store employing 89 workers to generate annual sales of more than $2 million, according to the trade group. Continue reading this article

Steve Bannon Is Targeted for Understanding the Jihadist Threat

Saturday’s Washington Post includes a front-page story about Trump aide Steve Bannon (earlier the honcho of and how a decade ago he planned a cautionary film about the danger of hostile islam.

What is it with MSM scribblers and their failure to remember history? Do they take an Islam-amnesia pill every morning before they begin reporting the stories of the day? Islam has declared war on the west and acts accordingly — from 9/11 to recent attacks in France and Germany, but when anyone points out muslims’ open plans for world conquest assisted by islamic immigration (aka hijrah), the press declares them to be a wacko and islamophobe.

Some muslims immigrate to fight for the world caliphate, and they hope to continue what happened on 9/11.

The Post reporter found it odd that a person engaged in communications would plan a film warning the pubic about unfriendly muslims and their aim of one world under Islam.

(Spare video here.)

The Houston Chronicle provided a brief overview of the Post article:

Steve Bannon Film Outline Envisioned ‘Islamic States of America’ In 2007, Houston Chronicle, February 4, 2017

The eight-page outline of Bannon’s film pitch warned of “fundamental clash of civilizations”

Trump strategist Steve Bannon pitched a movie in 2007 in which radical Muslims take over the country and turn it into the “Islamic States of America,” according to a treatment published by The Washington Post on Friday.

The eight-page outline of Bannon’s documentary film pitch warned of a “fundamental clash of civilizations.” According to the Post, the treatment proposes “a three-part movie that would trace ‘the culture of intolerance’ behind sharia law, examine the ‘Fifth Column’ made up of ‘Islamic front groups’ and identify the American enablers paving ‘the road to this unique hell on earth.’”

The outline reads, according to the Post:

“The road to the establishment of an Islamic Republic in the United States starts slowly and subtly with the loss of the will to win. The road to this unique hell on earth is paved with the best intentions from our major institutions. This political/accommodation/appeasement approach is not simply a function of any one individual’s actions but lies at the heart of our most important cultural and political institutions.”

“He actually sees the west in a war with these elements and he’s suggested that Islam in general is not a religion of peace, is something to be fearful of as Christians and as Americans,” Matea Gold, national political reporter for The Post, told MSNBC’s Joy Reid on Friday night. Continue reading this article

NPR Asks a Meaningful Question about Islam

Hostile Islam certainly gets a lot of mileage out of its official, polite designation as a “religion” and double that as a so-called “religion of peace” even as it headchops its way around the landscape and commits acts of mass murder on a semi-regular basis.

Jihad-inclined followers of Islam routinely murder non-Muslims (“infidels”) because the koran tells them to do so. In the photo below, ISIS prepared to behead 21 Coptic Christians in 2015.

So it was surprising that the politically correct narrative was slightly violated on NPR Friday when Steve Inskeep asked White House deputy assistant Sebastian Gorka (author of Defeating Jihad) whether Islam is a real religion in the mind of the president:

Trump Assistant On President’s Foreign Policy, NPR, February 3, 2017

INSKEEP: I want to ask about the president’s view of Islam, Mr. Gorka, because we’ve had so much discussion of that on the program here, and there’s been so much discussion in the country. I’m thinking of the national security advisor, Michael Flynn, who gave a speech last year in which he said Islam is a cancer that, quote, “hides behind this notion of being a religion” – sounds like he didn’t even think it is a religion. Does President Trump believe that Islam is a religion?

GORKA: The fact is we are concentrating – if you look at his speeches – and it’s really important – there’s one speech that most people didn’t pay adequate attention to and that’s the Youngstown speech from the president – also his Gettysburg Address. They tell you everything you need to know. And what is the phrase he uses again and again and again? It’s not Islam. It’s not a discussion about Islam as a religion or not a religion. It’s about radical Islamic terrorism. We are prepared to be honest about the threat. We’re not going to white it out, delete it as the Obama administration did. We understand that groups like ISIS have a religious verbiage. Continue reading this article

San Francisco Police End Relationship with FBI Joint Terrorism Taskforce

Has ultra-liberal San Francisco gone completely nuts? Probably. Despite being a top terror target because of its famous structures — just think Golden Gate Bridge and TransAmerica building — the city’s Police Department recently ended its partnership with the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force.

Security for the Golden Gate Bridge is a task assigned to several overlapping agencies, but a terrorist aiming to destroy the landmark would likely camp out in San Francisco during a planning period. Wouldn’t it be wise to keep an eye on hostile characters with the help of the feds?

The angry allah acolytes dislike San Francisco in particular because of what jihadists see as a sinful lifestyle. Last June, the Islamic state released a video, suggesting that the city by the bay would be a fine target for a jihad attack.

Nevertheless, the looney liberals fear surveillance of Muslims — as if that were a bad thing! Sensible scrutiny worked well for Mayor Giuliani’s New York City to stop more terror after 9/11.

Making San Francisco a jihad-friendly zone will only create a magnet for unfriendly muslims to move there. Remember, the Mexican killer of Kate Steinle said he chose the city as his home because its sanctuary policy protects illegal aliens, and an official prohibition of jihad surveillance will draw other enemies as well.

SFPD to suspend collaboration with FBI counterterrorism program, San Francisco Chronicle, February 1, 2017

San Francisco police will suspend the department’s much-criticized collaboration with FBI counterterrorism efforts, police said Wednesday, in an announcement that was celebrated by civil liberties and immigration advocates who have long called for stricter oversight of local participation in federal enforcement.

The announcement comes as San Francisco moves to disengage from the federal government under the Trump administration, especially in regard to the president’s directives on immigration and the treatment of Muslims.

The Joint Terrorism Task Force, which has two full-time city officers assigned to it, was established in 2007, when the police force entered into an agreement with the FBI that authorized intelligence-gathering by San Francisco officers of people engaged in First Amendment activities such as religious services, protests and political assemblies.

Advocates penned a letter to the Police Commission last month raising concerns that the department would follow federal law over local ordinances such as San Francisco’s sanctuary city policy, which limits city employees’ cooperation with federal immigration agents. Continue reading this article

Robert Spencer Warns of Islamic Immigration Danger

Robert Spencer has written numerous books about hostile Islam in addition to his blog, and while his scholarship is generally very informative, I’ve long thought he did not discuss the immigration angle enough. After all, how else does murderous Islamic jihad reach our shores other than by immigration?

So it was good to see him remark on that subject in a recent Ask Me Anything online session at

Useful_Vidiots: What is the single greatest thing you would do to stop Islamic terrorism?

Robert Spencer: Ban immigration from Muslim countries. This is not in reality unconstitutional. The Constitution doesn’t apply to non-citizens, and no one has some natural right to come to the US. Besides that, I would aggressively counter the guiding ideology of the jihadis – which the US has NEVER yet done in any way. During the Cold War we had Radio Free Europe and the VOA beaming into Communist countries explaining why Communism was a failed system. Now we don’t dare challenge the jihad ideology, because it’s religious. But what if, when we went into Iraq and Afghanistan, we had offered refuge to every woman beaten by her husband, and every secret ex-Muslim (secret because of Islam’s death penalty for apostasy), and every non-Muslim persecuted by Muslims, and every gay person in fear of being murdered, etc.? The outcome would have been very different.

Below, French soldiers guarded Notre Dame Cathedral where parishioners had to go through a bag check for Christmas services because of worsened terror attacks in France.

Spencer recently continued the immigration topic with a video and corresponding blog piece, observing the carnage that took place over the Christmas holidays in Europe.

Robert Spencer: This Christmas Was the Ghost of Christmases To Come,, December 29, 2016

Christmas took place this year amid heightened security all over Europe and North America. And this year’s tense and nervous Christmas is just the beginning: get used to it, because Christmas is going to be like this for many years to come.

The Mailonline reported that “the West has been put on increased terror alert over the festive period following the Berlin lorry tragedy. Security has been ramped up in major cities including, London, New York, Paris, Vienna and Dusseldorf, as fears grow of another ‘ISIS’ attack on the West. Tanks were seen in the streets of Budapest, Hungary, and soldiers were pictured at the Christmas markets in Antwerp, Belgium. The Metropolitan Police has said it is to review its plans for protecting public events over Christmas and New Year following the ‘awful incidents’ in Berlin and Ankara.”

The extra security was justified: not only did jihadis target the Christmas market in Berlin, but there were six other terror plots and attacks in the run-up to this Christmas day.

Why is this happening? Why are tanks in the streets of major cities, guarding Christmas markets? Why is the entire Western world on edge? Because European and North American authorities have admitted large numbers of Muslim migrants into their countries, among whom are unknowable numbers of jihad terrorists, and allowed Sharia enclaves to grow in which hatred of unbelievers and the necessity to wage war against and subjugate them is taught. Christmas is under siege because there are large numbers of Muslims in the West. The responsibility lies with those who admitted them without regard for Islam’s doctrines of religious warfare and supremacism. Continue reading this article

Automation King Jeff Bezos Objects to President Trump’s Immigration Restriction

These billionaires can never get enough immigrants — they work cheap and shop enthusiastically. You might think the third richest man in the world might have better things to do than overwhelm America with overpopulation and unfriendly diversity. In particular, the man who arguably spearheaded the drive to automate jobs and put Americans out of work should know the shrinking need for foreign workers in the modern economy.

But no. Amazon founder Jeff Bezos has signed on to support a lawsuit being brought by Washington state’s attorney general against President Trump and the administration over the President’s executive order on immigration and refugees.

Jeff Bezos bought the Kiva robot warehouse system in 2012 and set business on a different path by utilizing automation in a revolutionary way. (See How Amazon Triggered a Robot Arms Race, Bloomberg, June 29, 2016.)

Interestingly, there are no photos of Jeff Bezos with the warehouse robot system that made him a billionaire. Does he not want to be associated with the automation job killer? Bezos did introduce his drone delivery robot during a Sixty Minutes interview in 2013, but that was a rare personal connection with automation technology for him.

Below, a young Jeff Bezos lounges on some books in his Amazon warehouse in the 1990s.

Bezos says America is a “nation of immigrants” but in his workplace world, we’re a nation of robots.

Jeff Bezos Opposes Immigration Order As Amazon Supports Washington AG Suit Against Trump, Forbes, January 30, 2017 CEO Jeff Bezos, who was one of the most outspoken challengers in the technology industry to Donald Trump’s candidacy during the presidential election, issued a strong statement on Monday afternoon opposing a recent executive order that banned refugees and visa holders from seven majority Muslim countries from traveling to the United States.

In a note to employees, the Amazon founder said that his company’s policy team had reached out to congressional leaders from both parties and that its legal team was preparing to support a lawsuit from the Washington State Attorney General against the order. On Monday, Reuters reported that Microsoft would also be cooperating with the attorney general’s office as well.

“We’re a nation of immigrants whose diverse backgrounds, ideas, and points of view have helped us build and invent as a nation for over 240 years,” Bezos wrote. ”No nation is better at harnessing the energies and talents of immigrants. It’s a distinctive competitive advantage for our country—one we should not weaken.” Continue reading this article

Robot Barista Debuts in San Francisco

The automation juggernaut continues to crush jobs throughout the economy. Today’s example is the robot barista which prepares upscale caffeinated beverages without human workers.

In San Francisco, Cafe X’s robot coffee machine produces cappuccinos and lattes for sleepy iPhone users and others.

Interestingly, barista is a storied occupation for young people, and not always in a good way. In fact, the job has been used as an example of college graduates working far below their education level, particularly liberal arts grads. A report last year found that nearly half of college graduates were underemployed, though not literally as baristas.

Now, with robot baristas appearing in the local cafes, that job will be lost to humans of all degrees of education.

The coming machine age creates a tough future for young people who must consider what jobs will soon be done by robots or software (e.g. financial services). They must pick a career that is irregular, without predictable activities that a machine can replicate cheaper and faster.

Automation experts say the transformation to machines and software will only increase. Oxford researchers forecast in 2013 that nearly half of American jobs were vulnerable to tech replacement within 20 years. Rice University computer scientist Moshe Vardi warns of a dystopian future in 30 years when humans become largely obsolete and world joblessness stands at 50 percent. The Garner tech advising company believes that one-third of jobs will be done by machines by 2025. Forrester Research Inc. has a more optimistic view, that there will be a net job loss of 7 percent by 2025 from automation — but that’s still a deficit when more jobs are needed as population increases.

With the employment market shrinking severely because of smart machines, why does Washington keep immigration on auto pilot? America no longer needs uneducated welders and wrench jockeys to build automobiles and other manufactured items, but immigrants continue to pour in as if there were jobs for them. Remember:

Automation Makes Immigration Obsolete

While many of the news reports about the robot barista emphasized the cool tech aspect, Forbes included the employment picture.

Baristas Beware: This Robotic Cafe Is Coming For Your Job, Forbes, January 30, 2017

Behind a large pane of curved glass, a six-axis robotic arm swivels back and forth with hot cups of coffee. Two automated coffee machines in the back grind coffee, pull espresso shots and steam milk. The robotic arm — made by Mitsubishi and designed for industrial applications — places the cup near the front of the glass to await pickup. Once the customer arrives and inputs the four-digit code sent to their phone, the drink is sent down a tiny elevator and delivered to the customer. It all seems a little excessive for what amounts to a glorified vending machine, but the end result is a delicious espresso drink.

This is the first robotic coffee shop from Cafe X in the United States — the first Cafe X has been up and running for several months now in Hong Kong. Located on the ground floor of the Metreon shopping center in downtown San Francisco, Cafe X opens for business on Monday morning. The robotic cafe will serve only espresso drinks, and the prices are reasonable compared to other artisanal cafes: espresso costs $2.25 and an eight-ounce latte costs $2.95. The beans come from local Californian coffee roasters AKA Coffee, Verve Coffee Roasters and Peet’s Coffee. (Verve’s single-origin coffee bean adds $1.)

The San Francisco-based startup Cafe X is run by Thiel Fellow (which pays budding entrepreneurs to drop out of college) Henry Hu. Hu, 23 years old and a dropout of Babson College in Wellesley, Massachusetts, is unconcerned with what his invention might do to the baristas’ livelihood. Like many entrepreneurs in the field of automation, he likes to say his technology will enable people to do more useful things with their time. Hu got the idea after waiting impatiently in line for a coffee, he said. He noticed that much of the baristas’ time was spent simply moving cups around.

“Our reason for using a robot is not to save money,” Hu said on the Friday before the cafe’s opening. “The reason for using a robot is that it allows people on-site to be more productive, because moving cups around a thousand times a day is not a very productive thing. It’s a very repetitive, boring thing, which is why we have a robot doing that. ”

Instead, Hu said coffee experts can now use their skills to set recipes on the Cafe X machine. The coffee roaster partners come into Cafe X and tune the machine to make sure the espresso is coming out to their liking. The machine then remembers the roaster’s specifications and brews the espresso consistently.

Even so, Hu does aim to save money by cutting people out. Each Cafe X location requires only one human present to administer the machine, assist customers on orders and educate them on the espresso options. He guesses that each Cafe X system can make up to 120 drinks an hour. Hu aims for the cost of rolling out a Cafe X location to ultimately be less than what it takes to open a normal, human-operated cafe — which Hu estimates can cost between $250,000 and $350,000. Continue reading this article

New York Mayor Says Drunk Driving Is Not a Serious (aka Deportable) Offense

It is unconscionable for New York City Mayor Bill De Blasio to be so dangerously ignorant about drunk driving. During a discussion with CNN’s Jake Tapper about the city’s sanctuary status, the mayor asserted that drunk-driving illegal aliens are not a danger to citizens.

DE BLASIO: So, we differentiate. Anyone who is violent, anyone who is a serious threat to society, we agree we will work with the federal partners and they get deported. But we are not going to see, with a half-a-million undocumented people here — this would be true for 11 to 12 million undocumented folks in this country, the vast majority of whom are law- abiding — we are not going to see families torn apart over a very minor offense.

TAPPER: But is grand larceny or drunk driving a very minor offense?

DE BLASIO: Drunk driving that does not lead to any other negative outcome, I could define as that.

The CNN show transcript is here.

The problem is that habitual drunk drivers don’t kill anyone — until they do. Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) reports that the average drunk driver has driven drunk 80 times before the first arrest. In 2015, 10,265 people died in alcohol-impaired crashes, up by nearly 300 from the year before.

Of the Americans killed by illegal aliens, probably the largest group is the category of citizens killed by drunk-driving illegal aliens. Here are just a handful:

Below, 21-year-old Sarah Root was killed in Omaha just a day after her college graduation by one of Obama’s protected DREAMers, reported here: ”Drunk Driving Illegal Alien Kills Woman, Is Bailed Out and Disappears.”

Mesa, Arizona, Police Sergeant Brandon Mendoza was killed by a head-on collision with a previously arrested but not deported drunk-driving illegal alien with a blood alcohol level of .24 percent.

Young Alabama couple Tad Mattle and Leigh Anna Jimmerso were killed by a drunk-driving illegal alien with a blood-alcohol content more than three times the legal limit and who had at least four previous DUIs.

Houston Officer Kevin Will died when a drunk Mexican crashed through a police barrier at 90 mph and hit Will as he was standing on the roadside investigating an accident.

Three-year-old Marten Kudlis was run down in a Colorado ice cream shop by a 16-times-arrested drunk-driving illegal alien. Two adult women were also killed when the truck smashed into the building.

Best friends Tessa Tranchant, 16, left, and Allison Kunhardt, 17, died when their car, stopped at a light, was hit by a blotto-drunk illegal alien, who had three previous alcohol-related convictions but was not deported.

There are many more stories of preventable drunk-driving deaths caused by illegal aliens, but I’ll stop.

America’s Senator Jeff Sessions Is Recognized for His Unique Service in Immigration Enforcement

John Fonte has written a fine salute to Senator Jeff Sessions while the Alabama legislator awaits taking his position as Attorney General in the Trump administration. Hopefully, the rude Democrat logjam in the Senate will break up soon and allow this most honorable senator to advance to his next duty.

I will miss Sessions’ informative papers, critiques of legislation in list form and press releases from his office, revealing to concerned citizens what the US Senate was doing to their country, using immigration as a sledgehammer.

It speaks well of candidate Donald Trump that he recognized Jeff Sessions as a remarkable public servant.

Sessions’ many fans expect great things from him as America’s Attorney General.

Sessions Will Bring Record Fighting for All Americans to DOJ,, By John Fonte, January 30, 2017

Nominee for attorney general has upended GOP norms by putting the people first

In the final centuries of the Roman Republic, two political forces struggled for power: the optimates (patricians or elites) and populares (plebeians or the majority of the citizens.) In ancient Rome and modern America, for the most part, elites (particularly corporate and financial) have traditionally been thought of as “special interests” associated with the political Right, as opposed to the bulk of the common people on the political Left. From the days of the “Gilded Age” in the late 19th century until very recently, the Republican Party has been labeled as the party of Big Business, corporations, the Chamber of Commerce, “special interests,” the rich, and so on. Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign in 2012 seemed to epitomize this familiar narrative.

The conventional wisdom was vigorously challenged during the congressional debate over “comprehensive immigration reform” in the spring and summer of 2013 by Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), President Donald Trump’s nominee for attorney general.

On July 29, 2013, Sen. Sessions sent a memo to all Republican members of Congress stating that the “GOP needs to flip the immigration debate on its head” and adopt “a humble and honest populism.” Sessions stated that the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) “confirms that the proposal [the 2013 “Gang of Eight” immigration bill] will reduce wages and increase unemployment. Low-income Americans will be hardest hit.” He noted that “immediate amnesty and a drastic surge in low-skill immigration” would hurt “working Americans of all backgrounds.” Sessions urged Republicans to say “no” to “certain business demands and powerful interests who shaped the immigration bill in the Senate. ”

Instead, immigration policy, Sessions insisted, with its “lasting social, economic, and moral implications” should serve the interests of the American people as a whole, not the “financial interest of a few CEOs.” Republicans should “make an unapologetic defense of working Americans” which would be both the right thing to do (“prevent the implementation of a disastrous policy”), and be politically effective (“begin a larger effort to broaden our appeal to working Americans of all backgrounds.”) Continue reading this article

Rasmussen Poll: Majority Support President Trump’s Temporary Ban on Foreigners from Some Jihadist Nations

If you watched CNN or other liberal media the last few days, you might think there was a major uprising of Americans against President Trump’s decision to pause immigration and visits from certain terror-supporting nations.

But a Rasmussen poll conducted January 25-26 showed the opinion of voters reflected concern for protecting public safety, not a politically correct worry about the feelings of sensitive Muslims.

Young protesters complained about President Trump’s immigration restrictions in New York City’s Washington Park on January 25.

Don’t the city’s schools teach how on September 11, 2001, 19 foreign Muslims highjacked four passenger airliners and murdered nearly 3000 Americans in an act of jihad?

Rasmussen’s description included helpful background information on earlier polls.

Most Support Temporary Ban on Newcomers from Terrorist Havens, Rasmussen Reports, January 30, 2017

Most voters approve of President Trump’s temporary halt to refugees and visitors from several Middle Eastern and African countries until the government can do a better job of keeping out individuals who are terrorist threats.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 57% of Likely U.S. Voters favor a temporary ban on refugees from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen until the federal government approves its ability to screen out potential terrorists form coming here. Thirty-three percent (33%) are opposed, while 10% are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Similarly, 56% favor a temporary block on visas prohibiting residents of Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen from entering the United States until the government approves its ability to screen for likely terrorists. Thirty-two percent (32%) oppose this temporary ban, and 11% are undecided.

This survey was taken late last week prior to the weekend protests against Trump’s executive orders imposing a four-month ban on all refugees and a temporary visa ban on visitors from these seven countries.

These findings have changed little from August when 59% of voters agreed with Trump’s call for a temporary ban on immigration into the United States from “the most dangerous and volatile regions of the world that have a history of exporting terrorism” until the federal government improves its ability to screen out potential terrorists. Continue reading this article

Massachusetts Sanctuary Mayors Are Called Out for Violating Federal Law

A couple of Bay State mayors have been waving their diversity flag and doubling down in support of sanctuary, like Boston’s Mayor Martin Walsh who promises a safe space for foreign invaders in his city’s city hall:

Sanctuary Suites: Defiant mayor vows to harbor illegals at Boston City Hall, Boston Herald, January 26, 2017

“If people want to live here, they’ll live here,” Walsh said yesterday. “They can use my office. They can use any office in this building. Any place they want to use. They’ll be able to use this building as a safe space.”

Why do liberal mayors think immigration to America is a right? Should the billions of poor people on the planet be permitted to move here just because they want to?

The mayors say they want to keep their communities safe, but crime victims of illegal aliens see it differently because sanctuary cities are less safe for American citizens.

Milford, Massachusetts, resident Maureen Maloney objected to the arrogant mayors because she lost her son Matthew Denice when a drunk-driving illegal alien dragged him to death. The Ecuadoran alien, Nikolas Guaman, had a long rap sheet but was protected by Massachusetts’ sanctuary policy, allowing him to remain and eventually kill 23-year-old Matthew.

Below, in 2014 Maureen Maloney gave a victim’s statement at the sentencing of Guaman for manslaughter.

In the current matter of sanctuary, Maloney said her family’s loss will never go away.

Grieving mom calls out pols grandstanding on sanctuary issue, Boston Herald, January 27, 2017

Any grandstanding mayor who actually harbors illegal immigrants should be prosecuted by the feds, said the grieving mother of a Milford man killed by a motorist who faces deportation after his jail sentence is up. . .

“The ripple effect of losing Matthew is not just the pain and suffering of me and his immediate family,” she stressed. “He had a longtime girlfriend. They were planning on getting married. He had a huge circle of friends and extended relatives. The ripple effect just goes on and on and on.

“I hear them saying that we’re separating these (illegal immigrant) families. Well, my family has been permanently separated. And I can’t call heaven and I can’t visit heaven. I have to go visit a grave,” she said. “The illegals do have other options. My son has no options. He had a very promising life, and it’s gone. There’s no other way to put it.”

She recently spoke on a Boston radio show:

Sheriff Thomas Hodgson of Bristol County Massachusetts won’t accept the liberal do-gooder blather about protecting illegal aliens. He was interviewed on Fox News on Sunday and discussed the illegal aspect of sanctuary policy.

ED HENRY: You might call it a Sanctuary City Showdown. Some mayors are speaking out after president Trump’s executive move to strip funding for sanctuary cities.

BOSTON MAYOR MARTIN WALSH: You are safe in Boston. We will do everything lawful in our power to protect you.

SOMERVILLE MASS. MAYOR JOSEPH CURTATONE: Somerville will stand with you regardless of your race, creed, color, gender. . . We know what makes America great. Continue reading this article

Page 29 of 275« First...1020...2728293031...405060...Last »