The “Friendly” Mask of Mexico Falls Away

In the past, Mexico had smiled pleasantly as it ripped America off for billions of dollars in remittances, highly expensive US-taxpayer-funded healthcare and other freebies, even while pretending to be a friend and good neighbor.

It’s getting harding for Mexes to maintain appearances when the new sheriff in Washington DC has told them that the US no longer accepts to their duplicity: criminals are being sent home and a sturdy wall will be built to keep invaders out.

Unfriendly Mexico has chosen to fight back. It announced the other day that it would aid its lawbreaking citizens by jamming American courts with illegal immigration cases. The Mexican government has allocated $50 million to help its US-residing illegals fight deportation in court and has instructed its 50 (!) consulates to provide assistance.

Meanwhile, nobody in the media finds it odd that Mexico prefers that its citizens reside outside their own country. Where’s the love, Presidente Peña Nieto?

The Mexican invaders themselves apparently find jail in the US to be preferable to freedom in Mexico, as long as they believe they will prevail eventually. Funny how the illegals regard America as their territory.

Mexican Migrants Signal They Prefer Detention to Deportation, Wall Street Journal, February 12, 2017

Illegal immigrants meet with Mexican officials in Phoenix, discuss options under Trump administration

PHOENIX—All but one of about 50 undocumented Mexican migrants at a meeting Saturday indicated they would rather risk detention and long court battles in the U.S. than return to Mexico voluntarily.

The majority of migrants at the meeting in Phoenix, which included Mexican officials, signaled in a show of hands that they were ready to fight deportation in U.S. courts.

“Even if that means detention for weeks?” asked former foreign minister Jorge Castaneda.

“Even if it takes months,” shouted one woman. “Even if it takes years,” another yelled. “We are here to fight.”

Mr. Castaneda and others want Mexico’s government to endorse a tough and perhaps risky strategy to battle an expected increase in deportations of their undocumented compatriots in the U.S. by underwriting the migrants’ legal struggle in the U.S. court system. By overwhelming already heavily burdened immigration courts, Mr. Castaneda hopes the legal system would break down, bringing deportations to a halt. . .

Texas: Mexican Woman Is Sentenced to 8 Years for Voter Fraud

Rosa Maria Ortega’s mug should be made into a poster warning about voter fraud and plastered near every polling place in America. There’s nothing like hard time in the big house to show a government’s seriousness about a crime — and voter fraud needs to be prioritized, particularly when the perp is a moocher illegal alien. Mexicans do not have America’s best interests at heart.

Ortega’s crime rated a front-page spot on the New York Times’ Saturday edition.

Details about the case show the Mexican has been comfortable as a liar: Ortega checked a box on her driver’s license form showing she was not a US citizen, but she indicated on a voter application that she was an American citizen and eligible to vote.

Sweet that she got a nice long sentence. A few more cases like that and word will get out that there is a new sheriff in Washington DC.

Mexican woman in Texas sentenced to 8 years in prison for voter fraud, Fox News, February 11, 2017

A Mexican citizen living in Texas was sentenced this week to eight years in prison for voting illegally in elections in 2012 and 2014.

Rosa Maria Ortega, 37, was found guilty Wednesday on two counts of illegal voting after she falsely claimed to be a United States citizen and voted at least five times between 2012 and 2014.

A jury sentenced her Thursday to eight years in prison and a $5,000 fine.

The Dallas News reported Ortega voted in the November 2012 election and May 2014 GOP primary runoff in Dallas County.

According to Fox 4 News, Ortega’s identity came into question after she tried to register to vote twice in Tarrant County. Both applications were denied.

She had voted in five elections in Dallas before her registration was canceled in April 2015.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton – for whom Ortega voted in 2014 – assisted in the prosecution.

“This case shows how serious Texas is about keeping its elections secure, and the outcome sends a message that violators of the state’s election law will be prosecuted to the fullest,” he said. Continue reading this article

Professor John Eastman: 9th Circuit Flouts Immigration Law and Presidential Authority

On Friday, a judge on the 9th Circuit requested that the whole court vote on whether to review a three-judge panel’s decision to not reinstate President Donald Trump’s temporary travel ban on persons from certain terrorist states. Perhaps the judge was embarrassed by the political nature of the quickie opinion that ignored the fact that the Constitution gives discretion over immigration and national security to the President alone, not to the politicized members of the judicial branch.

Rush Limbaugh commented with a riff on Black Robes Matter:

Interestingly, since the court ruling allowing immigration from unfriendly nations to continue, the State Department has more than doubled the number of refugees: in fact, since the Feb. 3 ruling, 1,100 refugees have entered the United States, with 77 percent arriving from the seven terror-prone countries named in Trump’s executive order.

(Another major swamp for President Trump to drain is in Foggy Bottom.)

Back to the court decision, one of the most pointed criticisms comes from law professor John Eastman. He discussed the extreme malfeasance with radio guys John and Ken on Thursday, calling the 9th Circuit action to be the “judiciary refusing to recognize the results of the last election” — LISTEN ONLINE.

Professor Eastman made the same points in a strongly worded opinion piece:

9th Circuit court’s coup d’etat flouts immigration law, precedent, The Hill, By Dr. John C. Eastman, February 10, 2017

Like it or not, Donald J. Trump was elected president of the United States on Nov. 8, 2016, and sworn into office on Jan. 20, 2017. He won the election, in significant part, because he promised to enforce our nation’s immigration laws more vigorously and to enhance significantly the vetting of refugees and other aliens seeking admission to the United States, in order to ensure to the extent possible that terrorists were not coming to our shores.

Nevertheless, there is now a concerted effort by many on the left (and even some on the “Never Trump” right) to block President Trump at every turn in order to prevent him from implementing the agenda on which he was elected.

Regrettably, that effort now seems to include using the courts to achieve political ends that could not be achieved through the electoral process. The 9th Circuit’s order upholding Judge Robart’s nationwide temporary restraining order (TRO) is nearly as bereft of legal analysis as was the original TRO.

For example, in determining whether Trump was likely to succeed on the merits, one might have expected some discussion of the relevant statute that unambiguously gives the president the authority to do what he did here (and what President Carter, in response to the Iranian take-over of our embassy in Tehran, did back in 1979).

That statute, Section 1182(f) of Title 8, provides:

“Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restriction he may deem to be appropriate.”

It does not get much clearer than that, yet the 9th Circuit does not even cite, much less explain away, that statute.
Continue reading this article

Pew Map of Illegal Aliens: Los Angeles Stars in California!

Pew Research has just published a brief report illustrating the clustering of large numbers of illegal aliens, titled 20 metro areas are home to six-in-ten unauthorized immigrants in U.S.. So it’s simple: there are millions of illegals and they bunch up together in unlucky (or liberal) cities.

The Pew map tells the overall story:

The list of the most afflicted cities is explanatory, although not surprising.

Naturally, this report got attention in California newspapers, like the San Jose Mercury, which produced a wonky article with facts and numbers: San Jose, San Francisco among areas with largest undocumented immigrant populations.

But the LA Times went into full freakout mode in its coverage, because apparently few of the hispanic residents in the area are legal or citizens. Worse than we thought — is it possible?

Plus, the Times seems to think that if illegals were to go away, the economy would shrink and fail. Actually, if Los Angeles were a more American-friendly area where English is spoken and schools are not dysfunctional and crime is not overwhelming, many citizens would love to live there, perhaps with some returning from places to which they escaped.

Los Angeles was a nice American city before the illegal alien invasion and could be again.

And anyway, what wrong with living in Mexico? The nation ranks #15 on world GDP, and its middle class has been growing, so it’s a country with a bright future, and no annoying English is needed! Adios, Mexicans!

L.A., Orange counties are home to 1 million immigrants who are in the country illegally, analysis shows, Los Angeles Times, February 9. 2017

The chatter of Spanish serves as the backdrop of Pico-Union, where the aroma of pastries from the panaderia merge with the synthetic smells of an auto repair garage. A predominantly Latino neighborhood, it has for decades been a first stop for immigrants — both legal and illegal — coming from various corners of Latin America.

Over the years, this community has faced challenges, including from politicians threatening crackdowns on illegal immigration. But to many in this densely populated area near MacArthur Park, the presidency of Donald Trump poses a threat of an altogether different scale. Trump has vowed mass deportations of those here illegally, which if carried out, could fundamentally alter the rhythms of life in Pico-Union and numerous other immigrant enclaves around Southern California and beyond.

The potential threat of emptied homes and shuttered businesses has residents envisioning the worst.

“Una desolación. Imagínate no más,” worried Graciela Sandoval, 79, who has lived in Pico-Union for five decades.  A desolation. Just imagine it.

“It’ll be a ghost town here,” added Manuel Blanco, 42, a lifelong Pico-Union resident who runs an auto repair shop in the area. “It’s not even going to be worth being in business.”

An analysis released Thursday by the Pew Research Center underscores just how much immigrants here illegally have been embedded into the culture and economy of Los Angeles. Woven, often seamlessly, into dozens of cities’ infrastructures, they have become a workforce and community that makes up much of the fabric of Southern California. Continue reading this article

Paris Will Build “Esthetic Perimeter” (Wall) around the Eiffel Tower

Surely another nail in the coffin of France is the plan to build a wall — called an “esthetic perimeter” by Paris’ deputy mayor — around the Eiffel Tower to protect it from a jihad attack. The idea of the iconic structure falling to earth like the World Trade Center towers on 9/11 must be a top fantasy for violent Islamists.

Apparently armed soldiers guarding the tower are not thought sufficient to ward off allah’s little helpers.

The once beautiful City of Light — so called because of its history during the Enlightenment — has been transformed by open borders and liberal stupidity about diversity into a trash-filled and dangerous failed metropolis. Sad.

Naturally, people wishing to enter the secure zone within the wall will have to be frisked. It’s one of the costs of diversity.

Paris Builds Barrier Around Eiffel Tower to Limit Terrorism, Bloomberg News, February 9, 2017

Paris is spending 20 million euros ($22 million) to build a protective barrier around the Eiffel Tower to replace temporary structures that were put up after a series of terror attacks.

“Sadly, the risk of terrorism hasn’t gone away,” deputy mayor Jean-François Martins said at a Paris press conference. “It’s not a wall, it’s an aesthetic perimeter.” Continue reading this article

Make the Netherlands Great Again!

Dutch political leader Geert Wilders has created a video ad for the general election taking place in the Netherlands on March 15. His Freedom Party is polling well, and the election is thought to be a bellweather on European populism.

Wilders’ strong stand against jihadist infiltration has made him a big target for hostile Muslims. In the photo below, he posed with his special security detail for his visit to Garland, Texas, and the Mohammed cartoon contest event in 2015. After Wilders left, a couple Muslims carrying AK-47s with high-capacity drum magazines attacked the venue but were shot dead by Garland police.

Heres’ the video ad. It emphasizes that a nation’s shared culture needs to be protected when under assault from open borders welcoming an unfriendly tribe. Wilders clearly hopes for a new birth of freedom to save the Netherlands and Europe from bad choices made about immigration.

GEERT WILDERS: The Netherlands; A magnificent country! The land of our ancestors. A land that generations have turned from swamps into a miracle. The only country that we have. It is our only homeland The Netherlands. A flag that stands for freedom; it is the symbol of our independence. It’s a flag that says We are the masters of our own future!

The elitists only think of themselves. It is time for a change! The Brits have done it. The Americans have done it. And we, we will do it as well!

Our traditions are precious, they make us unique. They make us into who we are. They are centuries old, and we will not negotiate with anyone about them! Continue reading this article

Swiss Medical Staff Learns Self-Defense Because Islam Diversity

How diverse has Switzerland become under the influx of unfriendly muslims? One indicator is that doctors and nurses are learning self-defense to protect themselves from their Islamic patients.

It’s particularly sad that Swiss hospitals have become less safe when the Swiss people have been sensible in rejecting diverse immigration whenever given the chance in national referenda. In 2014, they voted to limit immigration, in 2010 they voted for automatic deportation for foreign criminals, and in 2009, voters approved a measure to ban minarets.

A Swiss sign from 2014 says “Enough already! Stop mass immigration.”

So the Swiss have tried to keep out the Islamic poison, but without total success.

Continue reading this article

Senators Submit Legislation to Decrease Total Immigration

On Tuesday, Senators Tom Cotton and David Purdue introduced their bill that would end chain migration and the diversity lottery in order to make immigration less harmful to American citizens. As America’s Senator Jeff Sessions has declared, “Immigration should serve the national interest.”

The two senators held a press conference to discuss the legislation. The initial description given by Senator Cotton was direct and well presented:

SENATOR TOM COTTON: Senator Purdue and I are unveiling what we’ve named the RAISE Act which stands for Reforming American Immigration for Strong Employment. The title should give you an idea of why we’re offering this bill. Over the last 40 years we’ve seen a huge increase in immigration. As you can see in this first chart, in the past 25 years alone we’re running an average of one million immigrants per year which is far above historical norm. It’s like adding the population of Montana every year or the population of Arkansas every three years.

As the second chart shows, only one out of every 15 immigrants is coming here for employment reasons. If we really needed all of these people because of their skills, because they help the economy grow, they be coming here on say, an EB-1 or an EB-2 visa, but they’re not. Instead we let them in without consideration of our workforce’s needs. Put those two together and what do you get?

A sharp decline in wages for working Americans, as you can see here. Those with college and professional degrees are doing just fine but those with a high school diploma have seen their wages fall by two percent since 1979 and for those without one, it’s 17 percent. Now, is automation a factor? Is globalization? Sure, but there’s no denying this generation-long surge in low-skilled immigration has hurt blue-collar wages. It’s pulling the rug out from underneath them and unless we reverse this trend, we’re going to create a near-permanent underclass for whom the American Dream is always just out of reach.

Senator Purdue and I think it’s time for our immigration system to start working for American workers. The RAISE Act would help increase wages by returning immigration levels to their historical norms and rebalancing the system toward merit-based immigration. There are three main parts of the bill.

First, we reprioritize immediate family members: we keep immigration preferences for spouses and unmarried minor children of citizens and green card holders but eliminate them for extended relatives like parents, adult siblings and adult children. Second, we eliminate the 50,000 visas and the diversity lottery which is rampant with fraud provides no discernible economic for humanitarian benefits and doesn’t even promote diversity. Third, we limit the number of green cards offered to refugees to 50,000 per year which is in line with historical averages under Presidents Bush and Obama and consistent with President Trump’s recent guidance.

The net effect will be the cut annual immigration in half from 1,000,000 to 500,000 green cards per year. This approach is broadly consistent with past reform measures and it would begin to move us towards a more merit-based system like Canada and Australia have. Most important, it would promote higher wages on which working Americans can build a future whether your family came over on the Mayflower or whether you just took the oath of citizenship.

Continue reading this article

Amazon’s Robot-Run Supermarket Will Need Only Three Workers

Amazon founder Jeff Bezos certainly is the busy little billionaire, as shown by his latest project of an automated supermarket, where technology replaces human workers to save lots of money for the third-richest man in the world.

Does Bezos not understand that destroying jobs is a long-term loser for Amazon’s customer base? When workers are no longer needed to perform workplace tasks, their lost jobs decrease buying power in the economy.

Bezos pioneered the use of robots in his distribution warehouses to move products and process customer orders more rapidly.

The Bezos supermarket operates from the individual shopper’s smart phone, which checks in at the store and keeps track of what the purchaser picks off the shelves. No tiresome checkout line exists, but there’s nobody to help you either. There are no carts to be seen in Amazon’s explanatory video, and the system looks designed for small purchases, like a sandwich or cupcake.

Furthermore, in an economy where human workers are replaced by machines, it’s ridiculous for the government to continue admitting a million-plus immigrants annually: many will end up as recruits for the angry underclass of people who cannot find a job because of technology.

And Jeff Bezos is not the only automation innovator: the business is going gangbusters in Silicon Valley and beyond with major investments in what’s seen as the future technology. Oxford researchers forecast in 2013 that nearly half of American jobs were vulnerable to machine or software replacement within 20 years. Rice University computer scientist Moshe Vardi warns of a dystopian future in 30 years when humans become largely obsolete and world joblessness stands at 50 percent. The Garner tech advising company believes that one-third of jobs will be done by machines by 2025. Forrester Research Inc. has a more optimistic view, that there will be a net job loss of 7 percent by 2025 from automation — but that’s still a serious deficit when more jobs are needed as population increases.

The Post’s article is a pleasant change from much technology reporting — which often gets lost in describing gadget coolness — by focusing on the job loss.

Inside Amazon’s robot-run supermarket that needs just 3 human workers, New York Post, February 5, 2017

If you’re a robot stealing somebody’s job, it’s best to stay hidden.

That’s what Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos appears to be thinking, as his Seattle-based web giant has contemplated a two-story, automated grocery store in which a staff of robots on the floor upstairs grabs and bags items for shoppers below.

The ground level of the futuristic prototype — a supermarket-sized version of its recently unveiled “Amazon Go” convenience store, with a bigger layout that could span anywhere between 10,000 and 40,000 square feet — would be devoted to goods that shoppers typically like to touch, sources briefed on the plans told The Post.

Those could include as many as 4,000 items, spanning fresh fruits and vegetables, eggs, meats and cheeses, and grab-it-and-go stuff like beer and wine, the sources said. Pharmacies might also might spring up at some of the high-tech locations, as Amazon looks to break into the lucrative sector, insiders said.

But for many, the most striking feature of the bigger stores is that they could operate with as few as three employees at a time. Sources said the plans call for staff to max out at 10 workers per location during any given shift.

“Amazon will utilize technology to minimize labor,” a source close to the situation told The Post.

Job-cutting technology isn’t new for Amazon, which has increasingly used robots to automate its distribution warehouses. More recently, it has been pioneering the use of drones to deliver packages instead of humans, and even filing patents for unmanned blimps that would serve as flying warehouses.

In the case of Amazon’s automated retail prototype, a half-dozen workers could staff an average location. A manager’s duties would include signing up customers for the “Amazon Fresh” grocery service. Another worker would restock shelves, and still another two would be stationed at “drive-thru” windows for customers picking up their groceries, fast-food style.

The last pair would work upstairs, helping the robots bag groceries to be sent down to customers on “dumbwaiter”-like conveyors, a source said.

With the bare-bones payroll, the boost to profits could be huge. Indeed, the prototype being discussed calls for operating profit margins north of 20 percent. That compares with an industry average of just 1.7 percent, according to the Food Marketing Institute.

Labor accounts for the lion’s share of a supermarket’s operating costs. In 2015, the industry employed 3.4 million workers nationwide, with an average grocery store employing 89 workers to generate annual sales of more than $2 million, according to the trade group. Continue reading this article

Steve Bannon Is Targeted for Understanding the Jihadist Threat

Saturday’s Washington Post includes a front-page story about Trump aide Steve Bannon (earlier the honcho of and how a decade ago he planned a cautionary film about the danger of hostile islam.

What is it with MSM scribblers and their failure to remember history? Do they take an Islam-amnesia pill every morning before they begin reporting the stories of the day? Islam has declared war on the west and acts accordingly — from 9/11 to recent attacks in France and Germany, but when anyone points out muslims’ open plans for world conquest assisted by islamic immigration (aka hijrah), the press declares them to be a wacko and islamophobe.

Some muslims immigrate to fight for the world caliphate, and they hope to continue what happened on 9/11.

The Post reporter found it odd that a person engaged in communications would plan a film warning the pubic about unfriendly muslims and their aim of one world under Islam.

(Spare video here.)

The Houston Chronicle provided a brief overview of the Post article:

Steve Bannon Film Outline Envisioned ‘Islamic States of America’ In 2007, Houston Chronicle, February 4, 2017

The eight-page outline of Bannon’s film pitch warned of “fundamental clash of civilizations”

Trump strategist Steve Bannon pitched a movie in 2007 in which radical Muslims take over the country and turn it into the “Islamic States of America,” according to a treatment published by The Washington Post on Friday.

The eight-page outline of Bannon’s documentary film pitch warned of a “fundamental clash of civilizations.” According to the Post, the treatment proposes “a three-part movie that would trace ‘the culture of intolerance’ behind sharia law, examine the ‘Fifth Column’ made up of ‘Islamic front groups’ and identify the American enablers paving ‘the road to this unique hell on earth.’”

The outline reads, according to the Post:

“The road to the establishment of an Islamic Republic in the United States starts slowly and subtly with the loss of the will to win. The road to this unique hell on earth is paved with the best intentions from our major institutions. This political/accommodation/appeasement approach is not simply a function of any one individual’s actions but lies at the heart of our most important cultural and political institutions.”

“He actually sees the west in a war with these elements and he’s suggested that Islam in general is not a religion of peace, is something to be fearful of as Christians and as Americans,” Matea Gold, national political reporter for The Post, told MSNBC’s Joy Reid on Friday night. Continue reading this article

NPR Asks a Meaningful Question about Islam

Hostile Islam certainly gets a lot of mileage out of its official, polite designation as a “religion” and double that as a so-called “religion of peace” even as it headchops its way around the landscape and commits acts of mass murder on a semi-regular basis.

Jihad-inclined followers of Islam routinely murder non-Muslims (“infidels”) because the koran tells them to do so. In the photo below, ISIS prepared to behead 21 Coptic Christians in 2015.

So it was surprising that the politically correct narrative was slightly violated on NPR Friday when Steve Inskeep asked White House deputy assistant Sebastian Gorka (author of Defeating Jihad) whether Islam is a real religion in the mind of the president:

Trump Assistant On President’s Foreign Policy, NPR, February 3, 2017

INSKEEP: I want to ask about the president’s view of Islam, Mr. Gorka, because we’ve had so much discussion of that on the program here, and there’s been so much discussion in the country. I’m thinking of the national security advisor, Michael Flynn, who gave a speech last year in which he said Islam is a cancer that, quote, “hides behind this notion of being a religion” – sounds like he didn’t even think it is a religion. Does President Trump believe that Islam is a religion?

GORKA: The fact is we are concentrating – if you look at his speeches – and it’s really important – there’s one speech that most people didn’t pay adequate attention to and that’s the Youngstown speech from the president – also his Gettysburg Address. They tell you everything you need to know. And what is the phrase he uses again and again and again? It’s not Islam. It’s not a discussion about Islam as a religion or not a religion. It’s about radical Islamic terrorism. We are prepared to be honest about the threat. We’re not going to white it out, delete it as the Obama administration did. We understand that groups like ISIS have a religious verbiage. Continue reading this article

San Francisco Police End Relationship with FBI Joint Terrorism Taskforce

Has ultra-liberal San Francisco gone completely nuts? Probably. Despite being a top terror target because of its famous structures — just think Golden Gate Bridge and TransAmerica building — the city’s Police Department recently ended its partnership with the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force.

Security for the Golden Gate Bridge is a task assigned to several overlapping agencies, but a terrorist aiming to destroy the landmark would likely camp out in San Francisco during a planning period. Wouldn’t it be wise to keep an eye on hostile characters with the help of the feds?

The angry allah acolytes dislike San Francisco in particular because of what jihadists see as a sinful lifestyle. Last June, the Islamic state released a video, suggesting that the city by the bay would be a fine target for a jihad attack.

Nevertheless, the looney liberals fear surveillance of Muslims — as if that were a bad thing! Sensible scrutiny worked well for Mayor Giuliani’s New York City to stop more terror after 9/11.

Making San Francisco a jihad-friendly zone will only create a magnet for unfriendly muslims to move there. Remember, the Mexican killer of Kate Steinle said he chose the city as his home because its sanctuary policy protects illegal aliens, and an official prohibition of jihad surveillance will draw other enemies as well.

SFPD to suspend collaboration with FBI counterterrorism program, San Francisco Chronicle, February 1, 2017

San Francisco police will suspend the department’s much-criticized collaboration with FBI counterterrorism efforts, police said Wednesday, in an announcement that was celebrated by civil liberties and immigration advocates who have long called for stricter oversight of local participation in federal enforcement.

The announcement comes as San Francisco moves to disengage from the federal government under the Trump administration, especially in regard to the president’s directives on immigration and the treatment of Muslims.

The Joint Terrorism Task Force, which has two full-time city officers assigned to it, was established in 2007, when the police force entered into an agreement with the FBI that authorized intelligence-gathering by San Francisco officers of people engaged in First Amendment activities such as religious services, protests and political assemblies.

Advocates penned a letter to the Police Commission last month raising concerns that the department would follow federal law over local ordinances such as San Francisco’s sanctuary city policy, which limits city employees’ cooperation with federal immigration agents. Continue reading this article

Page 18 of 264« First...10...1617181920...304050...Last »