Senator Sessions Objects to Democrats Rushing Amnesty Bill without Examination

Senate Democrats still plan to shove their amnesty plan down the throats of an unwilling public. Suggestions from Republicans that normal procedures be followed have been ignored by the open-borders Democrats. Senator Pat Leahy, the Chair of the Judiciary Committee, has insisted the process be rapid — quite a change from the Senate’s usual leisurely style.

The regular process for such an important bill would include months of hearings, with experts explaining what the costs would be with time for American citizens to examine the legislation’s contents.

Interestingly, the cartoon below is from 2007, showing how little things change in Washington’s halls of power.

Senator Sessions released a press release on Wednesday voicing his objections to the majority running roughshod over the public interest. (See also his list of 10 questions about the bill that has been negotiated in secret to please special interests like business and unions.)

Leahy Doubles-Down On Plan To Rush Immigration Bill Wednesday, April 10, 2013

WASHINGTON—U.S. Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), a senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, issued the following statement today on the announced timeline for moving a comprehensive immigration bill:

“The process that Chairman Leahy has described – a single hearing on a potentially 1,500 page bill – is unacceptable. It is an explicit rejection of the process demanded by Judiciary Committee Republicans and endorsed by Senator Rubio. To acquiesce to such a process would be to accept the Majority’s plan to rush through this massive legislation before the American people know what’s in it. Now that the special interests have what they want, the deal has been made: force it through and set the public interest aside. As with 2007, the drive to enact amnesty supersedes all else – including the open government principles of our democratic Republic. The American people are being shut out, the law enforcement community is being shut out, and the people’s representatives are being shut out.

We need a committee hearing on every component of reform, including the extraordinary potential costs to taxpayers, the impact on wages and job prospects for the unemployed, and the Administration’s continued refusal to enforce the laws previously enacted by Congress.

Failure to commit to this kind of open process is tantamount to an admission that the bill is not workable and will not stand up to public scrutiny.”

10 Questions from Senator Sessions for the Gang of Eight

Senator Jeff Sessions is one of the best list makers in Washington, in a good way. Efforts in years past have pointed out the nasty fine print in the 2011 DREAM Amnesty with 10 terrible items and 20 Loopholes in the 2007 Senate Amnesty Bill.

Now he is back with 10 excellent questions for the Gang of Eight, suggesting analysis of the bill that has been created in secret, away from the public’s curious eyes.

10 Questions For The Gang Of Eight; Some Of The Many Questions That Must Be Answered Before Legislation Is Produced, Monday, April 8, 2013

Due to the enormous complexity of immigration reform and the profound consequences for American workers, taxpayers, and society at large, many have advocated for a step-by-step approach rather than a comprehensive one. The last attempt at comprehensive legislation was riddled with flaws and loopholes that made it unworkable—serving the special interests but not the national interest. Dozens of crucial questions remain for the Gang of Eight that must be resolved before any proposal can properly be called comprehensive. The American people have a right to know the answer to each of them—and to express their views during a thorough period of public hearing and review. The public must know exactly what’s in any far-reaching proposal before anyone votes on it. With that in mind, here are 10 questions for the Gang of Eight:

1.  Is this bill enforcement first or legalization first?
After the last attempt at comprehensive legislation was rejected by the public in 2007, a national consensus emerged that any successful reform of our immigration system begins with securing the border and achieving enforcement of current federal law first—before creating any new legal status or amnesty. When the Gang of Eight first emerged, “enforcement first” was a publicly stated principle. Yet, on the March 31st edition of Meet the Press, Gang of Eight member Senator Chuck Schumer said: “We’ve come to a basic agreement, which is that first, people will be legalized. In other words, not citizens, but they’ll be allowed to work, come out of the shadows, travel. Then, we will make sure the border is secure. And we have specific metrics that are in the bill. I’m not going to get into what they are…” Following that statement, ICE officer and National ICE Council president Chris Crane explained that “the plan of the Gang of 8 appears to be legalization or amnesty first and then enforcement. That’s the big problem for us… Here’s my promise to America, if we don’t take care of the enforcement part of this first it will never happen. The only thing that will happen is that 11 million illegal aliens will be legalized.”

2.  What are the concrete metrics used to measure border security?
Since 2004, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has been required to maintain “operational control” the border, i.e., the Department must be able to detect, identify, classify, and then respond to and resolve illegal entries along our U.S. borders. According to a 2011 GAO report, the federal government has only 6.5 percent operational control of the southwest border. The stunning revelation that this administration had left the border highly vulnerable caused DHS to abandon that metric. Recently, Administration officials admitted that they have no standard by which to measure border security and have no plan to establish one, apparently because the Administration is concerned that it will discourage Congress from passing a large-scale amnesty. Meanwhile, Secretary Napolitano publicly dismissed the Gang of Eight’s idea of a border security “trigger” as “not the way to go.” According to recent news reports, the Gang of Eight is contemplating a trigger that simply asks DHS to submit a plan “to achieve within a decade 90 percent apprehension and 100 percent real-time surveillance.” Once that plan is simply submitted, illegal immigrants would be offered amnesty and, like 1986, there will be no way to guarantee that the enforcement will ever take place. Even the rejected 2007 legislation included a stricter trigger, requiring DHS to certify 100 percent operational control of the border.

3.  Does the bill complete the border fence and secure all ports of entry?
In 2006, Congress mandated 700 miles of physical double-layer border fencing. To date, only 36.3 miles of that fencing have been completed. Additionally, DHS has failed to comply with Congress’ nearly 20-year-old mandate that the government implement a biometric exit system to track visa overstays, which account for an estimated 40 percent of the illegal population in the country today. After the attacks of September 11th, the 9/11 Commission identified the absence of such a system as a national security threat. Importantly, GAO has specifically stated that without a biometric exit system, “DHS cannot ensure the integrity of the immigration system by identifying and removing those people who have overstayed their original period of admission.” Any comprehensive immigration reform must adhere to Congress’ mandate that a biometric exit system be implemented at all ports of entry—air, land, and sea. Continue reading this article

Senator Rubio Is a Star on Talk Show Even without Being There

Several political shows this Sunday included immigration in the topic mix. Senator Marco Rubio was a celebrated figure, without appearing in person, because grateful open-borders Republicans, particularly fellow Gang of Eighters, sing his praises — perhaps too much.

During his appearance on Meet the Press, Senator Lindsey Graham was effusive about his colleague, saying, “Marco Rubio has been a game changer in my party. . . Marco has been indispensable, 70:30, we get there.”

Acclaim from one of the Senate’s most dedicated amnesty villains is not a plus in many quarters, particularly among the traditional voting citizens.

Here’s part of the transcript from Meet the Press:

GREGORY: On immigration, what stands in the way of a deal?

SEN. GRAHAM: We’ve got an agreement between labor and business about the Guest Worker Program, but we’re revisiting that. We’re hoping to get this thing done in the next couple of weeks, is the Guest Worker Program. High skill and low skill labor. How can you access it in an affordable fashion when you can’t find an American worker? If we’re reasonable with 11 million, if we all give them a pathway to citizenship that’s earned and hard and fair, get in the back of the line, pay taxes, learn the English language, then the Democratic Party has to give us the Guest Worker Program to help our economy. That’s what we’re arguing over.

MS. FLOURNOY: Will Marco Rubio be there for you?

SEN. GRAHAM: Marco Rubio has been a game changer in my party. He will be there only if the Democrats will embrace a Guest Worker Program and a merit-based immigration system to replace the broken one and we’ll regain our sovereignty back, securing our borders and having control of jobs through E-Verify. Marco will be there. If we get the 11 million right on our side it puts pressure on the Democrats to come up with a workable guest work– a practical Guest Worker Program. Marco has been indispensable, 70:30, we get there.

Congressman’s Border Tour Reveals Same Old Lawlessness

Rep Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) visited the southern border recently, which was interesting to follow via remarks and photos on Twitter (@jasoninthehouse). He was pretty shocked at one border crossing spot which not only isn’t fenced, but has a handrail and convenient steps leading to the Rio Grande. We wouldn’t want any illegal alien to stub his toe en route to stealing an American job!

When he appeared on Fox News on April 5, he sounded surprised at the general level of anarchy, given the administration’s many assurances of border security. “That border is still very porous,” he observed and seemed taken aback at the diversity of the OTMs, from Chinese nationals to Romanians. At the Eloy Detention Center, out of 1500 total detained, 900 were non-Mexicans. Plus, parts of the border have no fence at all. Mexican kiddies cross the border daily to mooch free-to-them schooling on the American side at Naco Arizona.

So the border is just as lawless as it has been for years. But we little citizens are supposed to accept a nation-changing amnesty with the promise of future enforcement from Obama and his cronies.

At least Chaffetz sounds a little more interested in enforcement after his visit to the real deal. It’s always good to see the word “punishment” being used regarding lawbreaking foreigners. And lengthy incarceration needn’t cost a lot, as shown by Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s tent city detention center.

Chaffetz wants tougher treatment of illegal border crossers, Salt Lake Tribune, April 5, 2013

The southwest border is porous and the punishment for illegally crossing it is not tough enough, Rep. Jason Chaffetz said after spending three days in southern Arizona with Border Patrol agents this week.

While Chaffetz, R-Utah, has a list of problems with border security, what he doesn’t have yet are policy solutions.

“If there was a simple, easy answer I’m sure someone would have done it a long time ago,” he said Friday after returning to Utah. He said no fence will stop all illegal immigration, particularly for people involved in the drug trade and those searching for jobs.

The congressman is the chairman of the House national security subcommittee and he’s planning a border security hearing for May, where he’ll continue to explore the topic.

“I really worry that there is no consequence of coming across the border illegally,” he said. “There is no pain involved in that.” Continue reading this article

Senator Sessions Reacts to Jobs Report in Light of Looming Amnesty for Millions

Below is Senator Jeff Sessions‘ response to Friday’s terrible unemployment report which showed only 88,000 new jobs were added to the economy, about half the average of the last few months. Plus, the labor force participation rate dropped to 63.3 percent, the lowest since 1979 (the Carter administration). Nearly 90 million Americans older than age 16 are out of the work force.

There was plenty of hand-wringing about the dismal numbers, but Sessions was unique in connecting the report with the negative affect on Americans of the proposed behemoth amnesty.

Sessions: With 90 Million Out Of The Labor Force, We Need An Immigration Policy That Helps Americans Get Jobs, Friday, April 5, 2013

WASHINGTON—U.S. Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), a senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, issued the following statement today following the new jobs report:

“Today’s jobs report reveals that 90 million Americans are now outside the labor force. We need to be getting Americans back to work, helping people move off of food stamps and welfare, and find good jobs with steady incomes. But the comprehensive immigration bill being drafted right now would provide nearly immediate work authorization to millions of illegal immigrants while substantially increasing the future flow of workers. Our first priority must be to help American citizens, and current legal immigrants, find good employment. What we cannot have, and what is not sustainable, is an economic system where a large and growing share of our population is permanently unemployed while jobs are filled by a constant supply of foreign workers.”

The percentage of foreigners taking American jobs continues to increase and will grow further if the evil amnesty is allowed to become law.

New Radar Disproves Administration Fable of Border Security

The Obama administration insists that the border is secure enough to justify an amnesty for millions, even though just the chatter on that subject has doubled the number of illegals heading north to get the new welfare+jobs program for lawbreaking foreigners.

Now we learn that a new kind of radar, mounted on a drone, shows that a lot more illegals are getting through than was previously estimated.

No wonder that Gang of Eighter Sen Schumer recently reneged from the initial promise of border enforcement before mega amnesty.

On Meet the Press last Sunday, Schumer explained, “So look, we’ve come to a basic agreement, which is that first, people will be legalized. In other words, not citizens, but they’ll be allowed to work, come out of the shadows, travel. Then, we will make sure the border is secure.” (Watch clip.)


Legalization, meaning an immediate work permit, IS the amnesty.

Illegals don’t care about voting rights in some future US election. Only 40 percent of 1986 amnestied cohort were naturalized as of 2009. Democrat politicians care about citizenship for grateful future voters, but not the foreigners themselves, who come for the cash, period.

According to Senator Jeff Sessions on a April 3 phone call to Fox News, “as many as eight million workers” will be legalized, which means a bad effect on the US labor market, where 22 million citizens cannot find full-time work.

And they are still coming, with no serious enforcement to stop them:

Radar shows U.S. border security gaps, Los Angeles Times, April 4, 2013

Vader, a system originally used to track the Taliban, finds that more immigrants elude capture at the U.S.-Mexico border than previously estimated.

WASHINGTON — A sophisticated airborne radar system developed to track Taliban fighters planting roadside bombs in Afghanistan has found a new use along the U.S. border with Mexico, where it has revealed gaps in security.

Operated from a Predator surveillance drone, the radar system has collected evidence that Border Patrol agents apprehended fewer than half of the foreign migrants and smugglers who had illegally crossed into a 150-square-mile stretch of southern Arizona.

The number of “gotaways,” as the Border Patrol calls those who escape apprehension, is both more precise and higher than official estimates. Continue reading this article

Phoenix Recruits Diverse Non-Swimming Lifeguards

Another source of unacceptable whiteness has been found — this time in lifeguards, who lounge around in their skimpy outfits showing lots of white skin, poised to rescue drowning persons from death.

Phoenix decided that the shocking state of affairs must end, and therefore sent recruiters to non-white high schools to find young people willing to take the plunge.

Swimming skills were not required! Training would be supplied, so details like applicants having a fear of water were deemed unimportant. No mention is given of how rigorous the lifeguard “test” would be.

Diversity-beguiled NPR reported affirmative action swum amok without missing a stroke.

In Phoenix, A New Quest For Diverse Public Pool Lifeguards, NPR, March 28, 2013

After noticing that most of the lifeguards at the public pools used by Latino and African-American kids were white, the Phoenix aquatics department decided to try to recruit minorities.

More than 90 percent of the students at Alhambra High are black, Latino or Asian. On a recruiting effort there over the winter, the city’s Melissa Boyle tells students she’s not looking for strong swimmers. Like many under-resourced schools, Alhambra doesn’t have a swim team.

“We will work with you in your swimming abilities,” Boyle says.

Boyle’s colleague Kelly Martinez takes on the delicate task of explaining the scenario the city is trying to correct.

“The kids in the pool are all either Hispanic or black or whatever, and every lifeguard is white,” she says, “and we don’t like that. The kids don’t relate; there’s language issues.”

Martinez turns to a Latina student next to her. “Do you speak Spanish?” she asks. “We need more lifeguards who can speak Spanish.”

Competitive swimming still has a reputation as a white sport. And a national study released in 2010 found African-Americans and Latinos reported much lower swimming proficiency compared to whites. Continue reading this article

California: Wretched Unemployment Gets Upbeat Reporting

In California, scribblers are doing the happy dance over the latest unemployment news, because the rate of joblessness reached the “lowest level since December 2008.” Oh, huzzah!

Meanwhile, in Realityville, the state still has the worst unemployment rate in the nation — 9.6 percent — which California happens to share with Nevada and Mississippi for the month of February. But 9.6 percent is slightly less horrible than recent times, so the press is unduly positive.

True-blue California has had a particularly tough recovery from the great recession because of high taxes, crushing regulations on business and the taxpayer costs of immigration, legal and illegal.

The open-borders, big-welfare model of society doesn’t work, as California demonstrates. Even so, the Democrats who run the place see no reason to change. They want more Democrats, so they support amnesty, even though it’s a habit the state can ill afford.

Fiscal sanity is not promoted by the local press, which cheerfully whitewashes terrible conditions, as in the following:

State unemployment rate hits lowest level since December 2008, 41,200 jobs added, San Gabriel Valley Tribune, March 29, 2013

California’s unemployment rate fell last month to its lowest level since December 2008 and 41,200 jobs were added, the state Employment Development Department reported Friday.

The state’s jobless rate for February was 9.6 percent, down from 9.8 percent the previous month and 10.8 percent a year earlier. California has added a total of 725,100 jobs since the recovery began in February 2010.

“After a long recession and housing crisis in which the state lagged the nation in job growth, California is once again one of the nation’s job growth leaders,” said Stephen Levy, director and senior economist of the Center for Continuing Study of the California Economy in Palo Alto. “Are things better than a year ago? The answer is yes. We are on the right track, finally. We are growing faster than the nation but we still have a ways to go. ”

February’s growth was strong enough to push the number of unemployed residents below 1.8 million for the first time since January 2009 and the economy is gaining momentum across the state, Levy said.

“Southern California is now a full participant in the recovery,” he said.

Los Angeles County added 39,000 jobs in February – a sharp contrast from the 81,000 that were lost in January – and the county’s unemployment rate dipped to 10.3 percent. That was down from 10.4 percent in January and 11.4 percent a year ago. Continue reading this article

Obama’s Amnesty Is the New Border Magnet

Job-thieving foreigners have long been attracted to American jobs, but the recent border surge has been fueled by reports on hispanic media of the approaching amnesty the open-borders gang hopes to rubber-stamp into law.

At least that’s what invasive foreigners say in post-apprehension interviews, namely they heard from presumably Spanish-speaking media that they should run for the border to get their Obamamnesty before it’s too late to line up the necessary fraudulent papers.

Interestingly, many of the newbie invaders are from the poor countries south of wealthy Mexico.

It’s good that the DHS managers miraculously found sufficient funds to restore the Border Patrol to full strength from bogus cutbacks, because in Texas at least, the BP is being overwhelmed by the amnesty flood.

Budget cuts, DC debate have illegals surging across Mexican border, experts say, Fox News, April 2, 2013

Contrary to the Obama administration’s claim the border has never been more secure, high-ranking Border Patrol officials in Texas are considering the need for a “tent city” because of a surge of illegal immigrants in the Rio Grande Valley.

The wave of illegal immigrants, many from Central America, appears to be an unintended consequence of the debate raging in Washington over an immigration bill. In interviews after being apprehended, immigrants say federal budget constraints and expected amnesty or legalization for those already living here make it a no-lose proposition.

“We’ve seen a 500 percent surge in the amount of activity from August to December of last year,” Janice Kephart, of the Washington-based Center for Immigration Studies, told Fox News.

Whereas people caught crossing illegally near the Mexican border once opted simply to be turned back, they now increasingly are invoking their right to a hearing, federal sources told Fox News. The reason is twofold: Budget cuts mean they are unlikely to be held pending their appearance, and they also think establishing a paper trail of their presence in the U.S. will help when the debate in Washington ends.

Border Patrol sources told Fox News the newest illegal immigrants have nothing to fear from being caught.

“With the knowledge of immigration reform, you will — and are — seeing a huge flow of illegals hitting the Southern border looking to stay caught,” a Border Patrol source told Fox News.

Another said, “Central Americans and South Americans are flooding the system asking for hearings knowing immigration reform/amnesty is coming.” Continue reading this article

Mexican Cartels Invade More Deeply into the United States

It’s not exactly news that Mexican organized crime has expanded into all corners of this country. In 2008, the DoJ reported that Mexican drug trafficking organizations operated in 230 American cities.

Below, the map of cities reporting Mexican drug trafficking is taken from the appendix of the 2009 National Drug Threat Assessment.

Now the Associated Press has a report detailing the effects of having vicious Mexican gangsters in every corner of the country. The head of the Drug Enforcement Administration’s Chicago office Jack Riley believes that the Mexicans are an underlying cause of the city’s high murder rate. He also remarked about the cartels, “It’s probably the most serious threat the United States has faced from organized crime.” The Texas Department of Public Safety reported 22 killings and five kidnappings in the state committed by cartel gangsters from 2010 through mid- 2011.

Rush Limbaugh opined on Monday regarding the Texas murders of two prosecutors that the killers might be cartel members: “So here are your options. Texas DAs are being murdered. It’s either white supremacists or Mexican drug cartels.”

Plus, the worsening problem of Mexican crime in America doesn’t say much for Obama’s border security. Doesn’t the Constitution guarantee the states protection from foreign invasion?

Mexican cartels dispatch trusted agents to live and work deep inside United States, Associated Press, April 1, 2013

CHICAGO — Mexican drug cartels whose operatives once rarely ventured beyond the U.S. border are dispatching some of their most trusted agents to live and work deep inside the United States — an emboldened presence that experts believe is meant to tighten their grip on the world’s most lucrative narcotics market and maximize profits.

If left unchecked, authorities say, the cartels’ move into the American interior could render the syndicates harder than ever to dislodge and pave the way for them to expand into other criminal enterprises such as prostitution, kidnapping-and-extortion rackets and money laundering.

Cartel activity in the U.S. is certainly not new. Starting in the 1990s, the ruthless syndicates became the nation’s No. 1 supplier of illegal drugs, using unaffiliated middlemen to smuggle cocaine, marijuana and heroin beyond the border or even to grow pot here.

But a wide-ranging Associated Press review of federal court cases and government drug-enforcement data, plus interviews with many top law enforcement officials, indicate the groups have begun deploying agents from their inner circles to the U.S. Cartel operatives are suspected of running drug-distribution networks in at least nine non-border states, often in middle-class suburbs in the Midwest, South and Northeast.

“It’s probably the most serious threat the United States has faced from organized crime,” said Jack Riley, head of the Drug Enforcement Administration’s Chicago office. Continue reading this article

Illegal Stream across Border Doubles to Grab Obama Amnesty

Unsurprisingly, the Washington chatter about amnesty has enticed more job-thieving foreigners to flood across America’s southern perimeter. The illegal aliens obviously have little faith in the Obama administration’s commitment to checking the length of residence and other background examinations to weed out fraudsters.

Oh wait. “No human is illegal” — that’s the Democrat belief.

Future Democrats heed Obama’s invitation to enter the United Stated unlawfully.

Exclusive: Illegal Border Crossings Double, Border Becomes Less Secure as Beltway Gets Close to Deal on Immigration Reform, Townhall, By Katie Pavlich, April 1, 2013

As the immigration reform Gang of Eight inside the Beltway prepares to announce a deal later this week, claiming border security will come before a path to citizenship for millions of illegals, Border Patrol agents have seen illegal border crossings double and warn the cutting of agent work hours will only result in less border security, not more.

“We’ve seen the number of illegal aliens double, maybe even triple since amnesty talk started happening,” an agent told Townhall, who asked to remain unnamed due to fears of retaliation within Customs and Border Protection [CBP], something he said is common. “A lot of these people, although not the majority, are criminals or aggravated felons.  This is a direct danger to our communities.”

Data obtained by Townhall and reported within CBP from February 5 through March 1, 2013 shows 504 illegal aliens were spotted exploiting the Tucson/Nogales area, 189 were caught on CBP intelligence cameras.  Of those 504, only 174 were apprehended and 32 of the 189 on camera were carrying large drug load packs for Mexican cartels. Some were armed with AK-47 style weapons. Continue reading this article

Immigrant Family Brands Yemeni Diversity onto Daughter

Daughters don’t fare very well in the Arab world, and that fact doesn’t change just because the Muslims relocate to the United States, as shown by the incidence to honor killing here in this country.

Even low-level disobedience may put a girl in the hospital after a parental beating, as happened in Arizona to an Iraqi teen.

The latest affront to American values is the Yemeni family who burned their teenager’s arms with a hot knife for communicating with a male not chosen by the parents. And she didn’t want to marry her cousin, as the parents had decreed. The mother, Sahar Thabit (pictured), did the actual burning.

“Spare the branding iron, spoil the child!” — that’s the Muslim motto, at least in the Thabit family.

Why does Washington continue to admit these horrible people as immigrants, when their misogynist culture is objectionable to our values? Muslim immigration is wrong in all possible ways.


Mother arrested for burning daughter, WSVN TV, Plantation Florida, March 19, 2013

A Middle Eastern South Florida resident was arrested Friday for allegedly burning her teenage daughter with a heated knife.

Authorities said 35-year-old Sahar Thabit, who was born in Yemen, was punishing her 17-year-old daughter for befriending and talking to a boy online in defiance of her family, who want her to marry her cousin. She has been charged with three counts of child abuse causing grave bodily harm.

“This was pretty bad, because there were burn marks on both arms,” said Somy Ali, president of No More Tears, a non-profit organization that assists victims of domestic violence. Ali said the victim had three identical burn marks on each forearm.

Hollywood Police said Thabit burned her daughter in early January. Officials at South Broward High School became aware of the victim’s burns when the teenager’s classmate told the assistant principal her parents were furious when they found out about their daughter’s online friendship. Continue reading this article

Page 111 of 227« First...102030...109110111112113...120130140...Last »