Displaying the National Flag Upsets Some in Britain (and Elsewhere)

In Britain, some people object to seeing the flag of the nation being flown nearby. A diverse fellow in the video below asks how Brits would feel if he flew a Caribbean flag by his home — completely ignoring the fact that he is residing in Britain, not the island where his loyalties obviously lie.

Well, fortunately we don’t have that sort of post-national political correctness in America.

Oh, wait. The American flag has is now considered objectionable in California, and young citizens are not allowed to wear flag-emblazoned clothing to Live Oak High School in Morgan Hill on certain days, i.e. Cinco de Mayo. (See background at Crazy Mexifornia, May 5, 2010.)

Court backs Morgan Hill school in flag dispute, San Francisco Chronicle, November 12, 2011

A Morgan Hill high school principal reasonably feared violence on campus when he saw a group of students wearing American flags on their shirts on Cinco de Mayo, and he did not violate their freedom of speech by telling them to turn the shirts inside out or go home, a federal judge has ruled.

Citing past clashes between Mexican American and Anglo students over their clothing on the Mexican holiday, Chief U.S. District Judge James Ware of San Francisco said school officials “reasonably forecast that (the shirts) could cause a substantial disruption” and were entitled to take steps to prevent it.

While the Supreme Court has ruled that public school students have the right to engage in nondisruptive free speech, that ruling “does not require that school officials wait until disruption occurs before they act,” Ware said in his ruling Tuesday dismissing the students’ lawsuit.

Mark Posard, a lawyer for the Morgan Hill Unified School District, said Friday that Ware’s decision “affirmed that school safety is paramount.”

Bill Becker, a lawyer for the youths and their parents, said they would appeal “this bizarre ruling.”

“The court found that the rights of students promoting their Mexican heritage trumped the rights of students expressing their patriotism,” Becker said. If school officials feared disruption, he said, they should have canceled the Cinco de Mayo observance. Continue reading this article

Obama Non-Enforcement Is Welcomed at the NYTimes

According to the upside-down, evil-is-good New York Times, its beloved Obama administration is a tiny bit “uneven” in its deportation policy, meaning that the paper thinks too many foreign lawbreakers are being given free trips home.

But according to more reliable sources, the Obama-controlled ICE agency has been greatly reined in, perhaps to pump up the numbers of grateful hispanics (legal and illegal) for the 2012 election.

Interestingly, national ICE Council President Chris Cane stated on the Lou Dobbs show November 7 that the Obama Administration has ordered immigration officers at ICE to not make arrests, period. That certainly sounds like an amnesty.

Back to the New York Times, which lives in a reversed moral universe where illegal aliens are seen as victims of the cruel government, not job thieves. . .

To the extremist liberal mind, illegal immigration is sort of a try-out, like for a football team: if an alien lives in the US for several years without an axe murder or cannibalism, then he is cool to stay. Immigration laws are likewise seen as suggestions, rather than binding.

Obama Policy on Deporting Used Unevenly, New York Times, November 12, 2011

A new Obama administration policy to avoid deportations of illegal immigrants who are not criminals has been applied very unevenly across the country and has led to vast confusion both in immigrant communities and among agents charged with carrying it out.

Since June, when the policy was unveiled, frustrated lawyers and advocates have seen a steady march of deportations of immigrants with no criminal record and with extensive roots in the United States, who seemed to fit the administration’s profile of those who should be allowed to remain.

But at the same time, in other cases, immigrants on the brink of expulsion saw their deportations halted at the last minute, sometimes after public protests. In some instances, immigration prosecutors acted, with no prodding from advocates, to abandon deportations of immigrants with strong ties to this country whose only violation was their illegal status.

For President Obama, the political stakes in the new policy are high. White House officials have concluded that there is no chance before next year’s presidential election to pass the immigration overhaul that Mr. Obama supports, which would include paths to legal status for illegal immigrants. But immigration authorities have sustained a fast pace of deportations, removing nearly 400,000 foreigners in each of the last three years. With Latino communities taking the brunt of those deportations, Latino voters are increasingly disappointed with Mr. Obama. White House officials hope the new policy will ease some of the pressure on Latinos, by steering enforcement toward gang members and convicts and away from students, soldiers and families of American citizens.

In a June 17 memorandum, John Morton, the director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, laid out more than two dozen factors that its agents and lawyers should weigh when deciding whether to exercise prosecutorial discretion to dismiss a deportation. The memo called for “particular care and consideration” for veterans and active-duty troops, elderly immigrants and minors, and those brought here illegally as children. In August, the homeland security secretary, Janet Napolitano, announced additional measures to put Mr. Morton’s guidelines into effect, including a review of all deportation cases — about 300,000 —currently in the immigration courts, with the aim of closing cases that do not meet the administration’s priorities. Continue reading this article

Political Correctness Kills: the Lawsuit in Response to the Fort Hood Jihad Attack

There is no worse case exhibiting the dangers of political correctness than the carnage executed by Army psychiatrist Nidal Hasan in the Fort Hood pre-meditated jihadist attack which killed 13 (pictured below) and wounded dozens more.

The shooter was a walking, talking Islamic bomb, who was in contact with a top jihadist Anwar al-Awlaki (who was recently spattered by the US Army) and carried business cards designating himself as a Soldier of Allah.

Hasan’s commanding officers knew before the attack that he behaved unprofessionally, to say the least. He had lectured about the superiority of Islam to students when he was supposed to be speaking on medical issues, but officers feared being thought bigoted against Islam, so they let him get away with outrageous and subversive behavior.

Last February, the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, chaired by Sen. Joe Lieberman, investigated the case and released its own report, titled A Ticking Time Bomb: Counterterrorism Lessons from the U.S. Government’s Failure to Prevent the Fort Hood Attack. (Also see my blog Senate Report: Fort Hood Massacre Was Preventable.)

Sadly, the mental illness that is political correctness has reached the highest levels of the armed forces. General George Casey (the then-Chief of Staff of the US Army) remarked shortly after the shooting:

General Casey: diversity shouldn’t be casualty of Fort Hood, Reuters, Nov. 8, 2009

“Our diversity, not only in our Army, but in our country, is a strength. And as horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse,” Casey said.

“Diversity is a strength!” Thirteen people were slaughtered on a major Army base, and the Army’s top general believed that preserving diversity was more important than the safety of the troops! How can any soldier trust the leadership of an institution run by such PC buffoons?

General Casey was reportedly concerned there might be a backlash in the military against Muslims.

Actually a reasonable fear of hostile Muslims is a completely rational response to a religion-based massacre. (Survivors reported that Hasan screamed “Allahu Ackbar” before he began blasting away.)

The news now is that many of the victims and their families are suing the government. Hopefully the lawsuit will help the public realize that political correctness can kill.

83 seek $750M for Fort Hood tragedy, Associated Press, November 10, 2011

Eighty-three victims and family members in the worst-ever mass shooting at a U.S. military installation are seeking $750 million in compensation from the Army, alleging that willful negligence enabled psychiatrist Maj. Nidal Hasan to carry out a terrorist attack at Fort Hood, Texas.

The administrative claims filed last week said the government had clear warnings that Hasan, who is scheduled to go on trial in March, posed a grave danger to the lives of soldiers and civilians.

The government bowed to political correctness and not only ignored the threat Hasan presented but actually promoted him to the rank of major five months before the massacre, according to the administrative claims against the Defense Department, the Justice Department and the FBI. Thirteen soldiers and civilians were killed and more than two dozen soldiers and civilians were injured in the Nov. 5, 2009, shooting spree.

Fifty-four relatives of eight of the murdered soldiers have filed claims. One civilian police officer and nine of the injured soldiers have filed claims along with 19 family members of those 10.

“It was unconscionable that Hasan was allowed to continue in the military and ultimately be in the position to perpetrate the only terror attack committed on U.S. soil since 9/11,” attorney Neal Sher, who represents the claimants, told The Associated Press. Continue reading this article

Veterans' Day Thoughts

Patriotic holidays always lead me to reflect on the sacrifices made by members of our armed forces to protect American freedoms.

In 2011, the scorecard shows we civilians have not done very well in protecting the nation that so many thousands died to defend. The borders remain largely open, allowing hostile persons to enter at will, from unfriendly Muslims to Mexican organized crime. Our elected representatives can’t begin to stop spending money we don’t have, even after the Tea Party electoral success in 2010. One example: spending grew by $145 billion in fiscal 2011 compared to a year earlier, according to the CBO. America’s future looks dicey at best, given the financial irresponsibility of Washington on the most basic task it performs, that of taxing and spending.

But to be fair to Tea Party efforts at reform, immigration is the ground-zero issue showing how little control we citizens have to effect a government increasingly run more by globalist ideology and money than allegiance to US sovereignty. The American people have insisted for years that immigration be legal, controlled and reduced, with no substantial change. The reason is that the enemies of American sovereignty are very powerful.

Still, without reformist efforts, the border would certainly be entirely open by now in some sort of North American Union, and tens of millions of lawbreakers would be on the famous “path to citizenship” so beloved by the post-sovereignty bunch.

Patriotic holidays are therefore an appropriate occasion to rededicate oneself to saving the country, because it needs all the help it can get. And soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines have showed the real cost of preserving freedom.

Obama Re-election Plans on Diverse (Illegal?) Voters

Evidence continues to mount that Obama is eyeballing illegal alien voter fraud as an important part of his 2012 re-election strategy — heck, he’s from Chicago, the home of Vote Early Vote Often, where they have election scams for breakfast.

One item is a directive from the White House limiting deportations to axe murderers only, which may well create a feeling of grateful obligation among protected aliens next November:

Obama rolls back immigration enforcement, again, Daily Caller, November 8, 2011

The White House’s immigration lawyers have issued yet another bureaucratic order that will curb the election-year deportation of illegal immigrants, and perhaps spur the supply of Hispanic voters.

The new memo will shelter many illegals who have not committed violent crimes, or who are not suspected of being a national security threat, from routine deportation efforts by professionals in the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services agency. There are roughly 11 million illegal immigrants in the country, including roughly seven million in the workforce. [. . .]

Another symptom is the campaign to eliminate photo identification for voting. The hardline Democrat NAACP is spearheading the drive.

The background is that after the 2010 election, six states enacted requirements for photo ID at the polling place to prevent voter fraud, and the Democrats are trying to roll back reforms before 2012. Voter integrity has been undermined by Democrats who subscribe to Chicago principles — see John Fund’s WSJ article, Wisconsin and the Voter Fraud Agenda.

The NAACP complains that its flock has many without ID (overstated a lot, IMO), but this is the diverse America that liberals have created. People who celebrate diversity should admit that their desire for a more colorful country is not without cost. Proper identification is part and parcel of the new immigration-drenched USA liberals wanted, so they should pipe down, but they won’t because they want squishy elections.

It’s interesting that when the Border Patrol makes a mistake about one immigrant, leftists want the whole system dismantled. But election integrity is a snoozer issue for them, even though our whole representative government is based on it.

NAACP plans nationwide protests on voter ID laws, Associated Press, November 8, 2011

The NAACP is joining with minority and labor groups for a series of protests around the country meant to move discussion of voter-identification laws out of policy circles and onto street corners, the organization’s president said Tuesday.

Benjamin Todd Jealous appeared on the steps of New York City Hall with the Rev. Al Sharpton, U.S. Rep. Charles Rangel and community and labor leaders to announce plans for nationwide protests on Dec. 10 and across the South in the following weeks, decrying what they described as a nationwide voter-suppression effort.

The rallies are “intended to get this conversation out of the thought-leader class and down to the street corners, so folks understand that their rights are being attacked,” Jealous said, adding that the NAACP had already raised millions of dollars to support its campaign. He said his group has been urging the Department of Justice, which is considering the legality of proposed policies in Texas and South Carolina, to block the laws.

“This is the greatest assault on voting rights, happening right now, that we have seen since the dawn of Jim Crow,” he said.

Kansas, Tennessee and Wisconsin are among the states that passed voter-identification measures this year. Civil-rights advocates have argued the laws target low-income and minority voters by requiring specific types of photo ID to cast ballots, by reducing the number of early voting days and by instituting tougher laws on collecting registrations.

They say that blacks, Hispanics, senior citizens, people with disabilities and the poor are less likely to have the required photo IDs. And they argue others could be disenfranchised, such as voters who don’t bring ID with them, students whose school IDs are deemed unacceptable, and women whose drivers’ licenses do not reflect their married names or new addresses.

Supporters of the laws say that they are necessary to eliminate voter fraud, no matter how rare it is. And some argue that without ID checks at the polls, there’s no way to track exactly how many people may be casting illegal votes.

“I’m not sure how much fraud they think is acceptable,” said Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative Washington think tank. “The U.S. has a long history of voter fraud, and it could make the difference in a close election.”

Tuesday’s announcement came on a day that voters in Mississippi were deciding whether to require government-issued identification at the polls. Voters in Maine were considering whether to repeal a law that eliminated same-day voter registration. Last week, Democrats in the U.S. House asked secretaries of state in all 50 states to oppose voter-identification laws.

The United Federation of Teachers, the health care workers’ union 1199SEIU, National Council of La Raza and the Asian-American Legal Defense Fund were among the groups represented at Tuesday’s news conference. George Gresham, the president of 1199SEIU, said that his organization would bus 10,000 of its members from around the state and the mid-Atlantic region to participate in the Dec. 10 protests.

Is Obama Sympathetic to the Muslim Brotherhood?

In this interview on Michael Coren’s Canadian talk show, long-time terror expert Steve Emerson opines that Barack Obama “is sympathetic in some sense to the Muslim Brotherhood or to the Islamists” (5:12). Emerson notes that the President has only called al Qaeda a threat and has never used the term “radical Islam.” Brotherhood groups have been invited to the White House.

Emerson also described his new documentary on the topic of stealth jihad which will be released in a couple months, revealing how Islamists have insinuated themselves into American institutions. (Hopefully the doc will highlight immigration as the doorway which admits determined enemies to this country, the reason why Muslim immigration should end.)

The transcript for the video below can be seen at the Investigative Project.

Illegal Aliens Claim Hostility from Milford Americans

In Milford, Massachusetts, the site of a terrible crime of an illegal alien against a citizen, the lawbreaking foreigners are attempting to portray themselves as the victims, despite substantial evidence to the contrary.

The moral midgets who support illegal alien criminals, from la Raza to the Catholic church, know that the crime issue is poison for them. It’s bad enough when illegals come by the millions and steal American jobs, but citizens are disgusted by the violent criminals who enter through the same open borders, with their cartels controlling territory in southern Arizona and their habitual drunk drivers mowing down innocents on the roadways.

In the face of a criminal surge, the political accomplices burp out twisted excuses, saying that the foreigners don’t commit crimes because they need to keep their heads down out of concern about their status.

However, actual measurements of behavior paint a different picture. The 2011 GAO study titled CRIMINAL ALIEN STATISTICS reported, “In fiscal year 2005, the criminal alien population in federal prisons was around 27 percent of the total inmate population, and from fiscal years 2006 through 2010 remained consistently around 25 percent.” The percentage of illegal aliens in the general population isn’t near that number — yet.

In the case at hand, one of the most horrific illegal alien crimes of the last year was the death of young motorcyclist Matthew Denice (pictured) in Milford, Massachusetts. The townspeople were infuriated that one of their own neighbors could be cruelly dragged a quarter mile to death under a truck driven by a drunk Ecuadoran who refused to stop.

The latest from Milford is an attempt on the part of the illegals and their usual cheerleader gaggle (ACLU, churches, professional ethnic mouthpieces) to ju-jitsu themselves into being seen as the victims (rather than the lawbreakers) by claiming that the Americans are MEAN to foreign colonists. Despite their job theft, crime, extensive use of social services and general mooching, the illegal aliens still expect to be welcomed like they were legal immigrants — go figure!

They are further upset that Americans want to expand enforcement and punishment to make them self-deport. The illegals characterize proposed legislation as part of a “hate” agenda when the bill is simply an expansion of basic law enforcement. Their tribe-based attitude of entitlement shows the foreigners to be unclear on the concept that American society is based on law — another reason they should leave.

Speakers at rally denounce Milford as anti-immigrant, Milford Daily News, November 8, 2011

Religious leaders and advocates for immigrant rights yesterday condemned what they say is harassment of Milford immigrants following the August death of a Milford man who police say was killed by an illegal immigrant driving drunk.

“People in Milford are afraid to go to the hospital. They are afraid to call 911,” said Filipe C. Teixeira, a bishop with the Catholic Church of the Americas diocese in Brockton. “We have created a state of fear.”

Teixeira was among eight speakers at a Boston rally organized by the Massachusetts Immigrants and Refugee Advocacy Coalition. The speakers took aim at what they say is growing hostility toward immigrants – from name-calling on the streets of Milford to legislation proposed by Rep. John Fernandes, D-Milford, that would place greater restraints on illegal immigrants registering cars, applying for in-state college tuition, living in public housing and looking for jobs.

“This bill was filed and explicitly tied to the recent drunk driving accident in Milford,” said Shannon Erwin, state policy director for the immigration coalition. “However, it has 24 broad-ranging amendments, most of which have nothing to do with crime but would make immigrants’ lives more difficult.”

On Aug. 20, Matthew Denice, 23, was struck while riding his motorcycle in Milford and dragged nearly a quarter-mile by a pickup truck driven by Nicolas Guaman, a 34-year-old illegal immigrant from Ecuador, authorities have said. Police say Guaman was drunk at the time of the accident, and he has been indicted on several charges, including second-degree murder.

Yesterday’s event was sponsored by the Greater Boston Interfaith Organization, American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts and Amnesty International. Continue reading this article

Border Town Is Overwhelmed by Illegal Immigration — in Serbia

A location on or near the edge of the third world may be conducive to diversity, but not so much for domestic tranquility.

Serbian border town Banja Koviljaca has felt swamped by the crime of the increasing numbers of foreigners who end up in the asylum center there while trying to get into Europe.

The residents’ action in response was hold to a rally to protest the situation and keep their kids out of school.

Boycott of school in asylum seekers town, B92, November 7, 2011

Residents of Banja Koviljača in western Serbia this morning decided not to send their children to school, in protest over “uncontrolled inflow of immigrants”.

Local Lotel TV journalist Svetlana Ilić told B92 that only eight out of some 400 students showed up this morning for classes at the town’s elementary school.

A committee formed by parents and other citizens on Sunday organized a protest rally against what they said was a large number of foreign immigrants currently housed in that small town.

Banja Koviljača is also a spa and a tourist resort.

The committee will meet again on Monday evening, and will call for the Parents’ Council to meet on Tuesday and “decide on the next steps to be taken”.

On Sunday, they demanded urgent removal of all illegal immigrants and asylum seekers, as well as the Asylum Center located in the spa. 
 Continue reading this article

State Department Limits Onerous Visa Program

The State Department’s program of admitting thousands of foreign college students on the J-1 visa program has been a stab in the back to young Americans looking for a job in a toxic employment environment. The current youth unemployment rate is the highest since World War II, and an August BLS survey reported that more than 4 million American young people were jobless, over 18 percent.

And yet, Washington has continued merrily along with special visas for foreign young people because the elites imagine that such programs are a cheap way (for them) to accomplish foreign policy goals of fostering friendly relations with unfriendlies, (like the Saudis). The Denver Post reported that “there were 320,805 visas for all categories of J-1 visitors for 2010.”

For more background, see my June blog, Foreign Student Workers Are Still Welcomed in America.

The good news today is that the State Department is capping the egregious J-1 visa program. The bad news is that it is not being ended completely — something that almost never happens in Washington, regrettably. Also, the reason cited in the enclosed news article for the change is that the level of exploitation of the foreign kiddies was getting out of hand. There is no mention of Americans being harmed by a federal program that saves employers 8 percent to hire foreigners over citizens.

Below, a Bulgarian student works as a lifeguard in the United States. Is lifeguard a job young Americans don’t want to do?

US limits troubled visa program, Associated Press, November 7, 2011

The State Department is capping a popular exchange program for foreign college students over persistent problems that have included low-paid participants turning to homeless shelters, a walkout over working conditions at a chocolate factory and in one case a woman forced to work as a stripper.

The agency published new rules Monday that limit the number of future participants to this year’s level and put a moratorium on new businesses becoming sponsors for thousands of foreigners who use the program to visit the United States.

The changes to the J-1 summer work and travel program come 11 months after The Associated Press reported widespread abuses, including some students paid $1 an hour or less for menial jobs.

The students given temporary visas for up to four months are required to have jobs and often work in resorts and restaurants. Participation has boomed from about 20,000 students in 1996 to a peak of more than 150,000 in 2008 and roughly one million foreign post-secondary students have participated in the past decade.

The State Department enacted stronger rules this past summer, but says complaints remain high.

The department says future participation will be limited to the “2011 actual participant levels.” Continue reading this article

Florida: Muslim Plans for Animal Sacrifice Go Private

Islam’s unique diversity has penetrated Florida with plans of local Muslim residents to slaughter animals in the traditional celebration of Eid al-Adha, but there was a kink. The original idea was to kill some lambs for Allah out in an open field, but that hit a roadblock when a local official nixed the plan. (See details in the Daily Mail’s Muslims banned from slitting throat of sacrificial lamb during religious festival in Florida field (but they vow to do it anyway).)

Nothing says celebration in Islam like bloody slaughter, particularly with throat slitting.

Below, Eid al-Adha (Festival of Sacrifice) is celebrated in Egypt by street slaughter of sheep, goats and other animals. Fun for the whole family!

There was a change in plans for the Muslim celebrants in Florida, however; the ruckus convinced them to remove their critter head-chop to a private venue. Good. The practice is not suitable for Western standards of public sanitation or animal welfare. Muslims like to claim that do-it-yourself slaughter is not cruel, but evidence indicates otherwise.

Interestingly, it’s not just Floridians who don’t want Muslim sacrifice diversity to run amok; Moscovites object to streets filled with blood and required that local Allah-bots perform their death rituals in proper facilities.

Moscow City Government Orders Muslims to Carry Out Eid Sacrifices in Slaughterhouses, Ahlul Bayt News Agency, October 25, 2011

After dramatic scenes of roadside ritual animal sacrifice during last year’s Eid, which shocked feint-hearted passers by, the Moscow city government has ordered Muslims to restrict their activities to slaughterhouses or to areas outside of the city.

Eid this year will be celebrated in Moscow on 6 November.

Government officials say the ban on outdoor slaughter is already covered by existing legislation and comes under cruelty to animals laws. [. . .]

Now back to Florida:

Land owner cancels ritual Eid slaughter after city official complains, Sacramento Bee, November 5, 2011

SUNRISE, Fla. — Disturbed by the prospect of lambs and goats being slaughtered in her city, Sunrise Commissioner Sheila Alu single-handedly blocked a Muslim religious ceremony set to take place on Sunday.

“Yes, I was trying to stop it,” Alu said. “It’s shut down. I’m trying to protect innocent animals. This is not an appropriate setting for the slaughtering of animals in an open field in a city that’s as populated as Sunrise. Usually these religious ceremonies take place in a rural area.”

The news did not sit well with Nezar Hamze, executive director of the South Florida Council on American-Islamic Relations based in Pembroke Pines, Fla., a suburb 30 minutes northwest of Miami.

“Wow,” Hamze said. “That is very upsetting. We’ll find another venue. But that’s very disturbing. I’m very disappointed in that. We asked for permission and went through the proper channels and now it’s off because a commissioner has a problem with it.”

Muslims from local mosques had planned to gather at a 45-acre farm in Sunrise to celebrate the Eid ul-Adha, the Festival of Sacrifice, Hamze said. The holiday honors Abraham’s willingness to sacrifice his son, before God provided a sacrificial lamb instead.

The day also marks the end of the pilgrimage to Mecca that all Muslims are urged to make at least once in their lifetime. Continue reading this article

Press Conference Spotlights Crime Victims of Illegal Aliens

On Thursday, several friends of immigration enforcement, including Congressmen Steve King and Walter Jones along with representatives from the FIRE Coalition and Immigration Tea Party, held a press conference near the capitol to draw attention to the crime victims of illegal aliens.

One proposal is to establish a National Day of Remembrance for those victims to occur on November 6, the anniversary of the IRCA amnesty (25 years coming up).

A related issue is legislation requiring comprehensive statistics on illegal alien crime from federal and local governments, something that has been sorely lacking (HR 3168, the Illegal Alien Crime Reporting Act of 2011).

Rep. Steve King has done some great work, including requesting a GAO report on illegal alien crime, which should be required reading for anyone concerned with the issue: CRIMINAL ALIEN STATISTICS, March 2011.

Congressman King’s statement at the presser was both informative and heartfelt about the victims. He emphasized the point that illegal alien crime is preventable crime.

The point is that open borders are a welcome mat to the criminals of the world who see the United States as a full refrigerator of felony opportunity. Sanctuary cities provide protection to foreign criminals that domestic thugs would love to have.

In addition there are cultural issues, particularly around drunk driving, which is considered to be desirably macho behavior among hispanics. Even NPR admits that “Latinos are responsible for a disproportionate number of DWI arrests and alcohol-related car accidents.” The deaths resulting from drunk driving illegal aliens continues to accumulate, but DHS and many local law enforcement agencies continue to treat the crime casually.

Here is the statement on Congressman King’s website:

King’s Resolution Supports November 6th as a National Day of Remembrance for the victims of crimes committed by illegal aliens

Washington D.C.- Washington D.C.- Congressman King (R-IA) joined the FIRE Coalition and the Tea Party Immigration Coalition this morning to recognize the victims who have lost their lives because of the criminal acts of illegal aliens. Since 1955, there have been 25,065 homicide arrests of criminal aliens in the United States, and King’s resolution aims to honor and mourn these preventable deaths.

“These are real human stories, there’s real pain and real agony going on on a daily basis in the United States of America, and we treat it as if it’s just some kind of tolerable interruption of our lives. It’s not. It’s an interruption of innocent lives that takes place because we have an administration that refuses to enforce immigration law.”

Rick Perry Supports Work Visas for Illegal Aliens

Rick Perry is dumb as a box of rocks when it comes to borders and immigration enforcement. He is still apologizing for making insulting remarks about pro-sovereignty patriots in the September 22 debate when he said that anyone who doesn’t support in-state tuition for illegal aliens doesn’t have a heart.

The man didn’t learn anything from seeing his poll numbers crater to single digits after making that crude statement. His latest foot-in-mouth remark was support for work visas for illegal aliens — but no US citizenship for them. As if that mattered a frijole.

Illegal aliens come for the money only. A permit to work legally is the key to the kingdom for them. They don’t care about US citizenship; only La Raza and other political marxicans are concerned with herding hispanics to the polls.

From a psychological perspective, rewarding lawbreakers guarantees the unwanted behavior will continue. Any amnesty (including work permits) will correctly inform wanna-bes around the world that America is still not serious about immigration enforcement.

And hasn’t Perry heard about American unemployment? There’s a jobs depression in the land, and transforming millions of illegal aliens into legal workers in a kick in the teeth for jobless citizens.

Below, Perry and former Mexico Presidente Vicente Fox had a very friendly trans-border partnership. (In 2003, then-Presidente Fox thanked Gov. Perry for in-state tuition for Mexican illegal alien students whose educations were subsidized by Texas taxpayers.)

Perry endorses work visas for illegal immigrants, Associated Press, November 3, 2011

Texas Gov. Rick Perry proposed the federal government should extend work visas allowing illegal immigrants to move freely between the U.S. and their home countries — but stressed that he opposes amnesty or a path to citizenship.

Perry said in an interview with CNN’s John King on Thursday that expectations that U.S. authorities are going to arrest and deport up to 15 million illegal immigrants isn’t realistic. He added, however, that other Republicans, including fellow Texan George W. Bush, went too far when they previously proposed an immigration overhaul that included a path to citizenship.

The Texas governor also claimed his chief rival for the Republican presidential nomination, Mitt Romney, had once supported amnesty. Romney has drawn criticism for hiring a lawn care company that employed illegal immigrants at his family’s property in a Boston suburb for a decade — but has also said amnesty is not appropriate for illegal immigrants.

“You can put a program into place in which these individuals can be identified, and work visas in which they can move back and forth between their countries but not to become United States citizens,” Perry said. “And I think that’s where McCain, that’s where Romney, that’s where even Bush went wrong when they talked about the issue that, `we’re going to give amnesty to these individuals,’ and people just said, `no, we’re not.’”

Perry didn’t elaborate on what such a visa plan would look like, saying only that authorities need to determine a better way to identify illegal immigrants and make them part of mainstream society. He also said the program would only work if the federal government first does a better job securing America’s borders. Continue reading this article