Very few of the would-be killers-for-Allah are converts. A few do exist, but most terror types are Muslim immigrants who were already spending their Fridays at the mosque, soaking up anti-American hate.
But according to the dinosaur media’s usage, the word “homegrown” seems to mean anyone who didn’t purposefully come to American to commit jihad. Faisal Shahzad, the Times Square wanna-be bomber, came to the US as a college student at age 18, when he was an adult by law, but he got the tag. Or maybe calling Shahzad “homegrown” suggests that he got in touch with his inner jihadist only after living for years among the American infidels.
Anyway, Stakelbeck opines that Islam’s habit of mass murdering infidels hasn’t gone away just because Osama was snuffed. He calls the danger “homegrown” terror even though most of the perps will probably be immigrant and foreign Muslims, the same as up to now.
Despite the death of Osama bin Laden, the Islamic terrorist threat against America is far from over.
The trove of intelligence recovered during the May 1 raid on bin Laden’s Pakistan lair indicates al Qaeda may be shifting its focus to smaller American cities nationwide.
The terror kingpin also encouraged his followers to target trains.
“The counter-terrorism community is now clearly looking at the mid-sized operations as they were designed and called for by bin Laden in his captured diaries as the future for al Qaeda and the jihadist movement in America,” Walid Phares, author of the book Future Jihad, told CBN News. Continue reading this article
For the “they keep coming” file: more than 500 illegals were found in two semi trucks, busted in southern Chiapas at a Mexican checkpoint. Each paid $7000 to be hauled like cattle to America, in very tight conditions, as shown below in the x-ray shot:
Most were from Central America, but a few were nationals of Asian nations. Mexico doesn’t mind arresting other aliens trying to enter America because it wants all the illegal jobs going to Mexicans, to keep the billions of dollars in remittances flowing to that country.
TUXTLA GUTIERREZ, Mexico – Police in Mexico’s southern Chiapas state found 513 migrants on Tuesday inside two trailer trucks bound for the United States, and said they had been transported in dangerously crowded conditions.
Some of the immigrants were suffering from dehydration after traveling for hours clinging to cargo ropes strung inside the containers to keep them upright as the trucks bounced along from the Guatemalan border, and allow more migrants to be more crammed in on the floor.
The trucks had air holes punched in the tops of the containers, but migrants interviewed at the state prosecutors’ office said they lacked air and water. The trucks were bound for the central city of Puebla, where the migrants said they had been told they would be loaded aboard a second set of vehicles for the trip to the U.S. border.
“We were suffering, it was very hot and we were clinging to the ropes,” said Mario, a 23-year-old Honduran migrant who identified himself only by his first name, for security reasons. Mexico’s National Human Rights Commission says thousands of undocumented migrants are kidnapped and held for ransom by drug gangs in Mexico each year. Continue reading this article
In the new post-American USA, citizens often get second-class treatment. Young people who are scrambling to make a place for themselves are particularly at risk under the updated rules which actually favor foreigners, even illegal ones, over US citizens.
This week, Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley signed a bill to require the state’s public universities to give undocumented aliens — generally illegal — in-state tuition privileges.
The bill, known as the Dream Act, is already the law in ten other states, including California, New York, Texas and Illinois.
But critics argue that the bill will give illegal aliens better treatment than Americans and legal immigrants — thanks to existing diversity policies at universities.
But that’s not all. American young folks are also disadvantaged by Washington’s decision to let US-educated foreign students stay on and compete with citizens for jobs.
American college educations used to be seen largely as cheapie goodwill foreign policy: i.e., give future leaders abroad a taste of US democracy and they will remember it throughout their lives. One example was President Bush’s special scholarship program for his friends the Saudis, allowing 30,000 from The Kingdom to get educated here over several years — with predictable problems, from terror schemes to sexual harassment of women students.
On the heels of President Obama’s immigration speech last week, the Department of Homeland Security is expanding the pool of foreign students eligible for a 17-month visa extension — giving presumably brainy grads more time to train and, in some cases, secure a long-term job.
The administration claims the move is a step toward “fixing our broken immigration system,” by ensuring high-tech students can put their skills to use in the U.S., not overseas. But it’s also raised concern that the change could hurt U.S. job-seekers by making them compete against more foreign graduates, at a time when unemployment is already high.
David North, a fellow with the Center for Immigration Studies, said foreign students might even gain an edge, considering those who take advantage of this particular extension will not have to pay Social Security or Medicare taxes, and neither will their employers. North estimated that, because of the tax factor, companies would get a 7.65 percent discount by hiring a foreign student under this program, something he said creates an “unequal playing field” for other college grads. The students and employers would only have to pay those taxes if and when they secured a regular work visa.
“I’m not sure how many employers know this, but boy when it gets around, it’ll make some people very attractive,” North told FoxNews.com. “It gives the employer a bonus for hiring the foreign worker.”
The DHS announcement pertains to student visa holders who wish to stay in the country longer through what’s known as the “optional practical training” program. Through the program, students could originally work and train in their field of study for up to 12 months, even after graduating. Several years ago, the George W. Bush administration allowed certain students in the fields of science, technology, engineering and math to stay an additional 17 months — for a total of 29 months.
The announcement last week by the Obama administration added dozens of eligible degree programs to that list. The newly eligible fields range from the popular to the obscure — among them are soil microbiology, video graphics and special effects, dairy science, neuroscience, mathematics and computer science, business statistics and personality psychology. Continue reading this article
The video below is a locally produced examination of hostile Muslim activities in the Nashville area. As is often the case, the “moderate” Muslims are no such thing. An imam who is a leader in local interfaith dialogue, Awadh Binhazim, is shown by his own words to be a radical promoter of Islamic supremacism. Muslims residing in non-Muslim societies must oppose Westernization and work to implement sharia, he says. But local civic leaders have been too polite and politically correct to question Binhazim because he has played the interfaith game very effectively.
Losing Our Sons is a documentary film that will reveal how radical Islam dominates the leadership of the Muslim American community in Nashville; and how misguided government and university officials, the media, as well as civic and religious leaders failed to acknowledge, intervene, or report clear indications of Islamist radicalization in the community.
It would be great if concerned patriots around the nation could use this film as a model of how to investigate hostile Islam in their own communities. The video is also a reminder that Muslim immigration is a bad idea and should be ended.
So I was somewhat surprised to read his sensible opinion piece on the advisability of using the Secure Communities program, filled with convincing facts. He favors identifying the thousands of bad guys who swim in the sea of ethnic groups and deporting them in order to protect citizens — imagine that.
Below, some foreign gangsters identify themselves with explanatory tattoos, helpful to police. There are more than 250 active gangs in Los Angeles.
Consider the following case: In January, a local police agency arrested a man for driving with a suspended license. A subsequent fingerprint screening revealed that he was also a convicted felon illegally in the United States from Mexico. His record included three prior drug trafficking convictions and six deportations in 11 years.
Or consider this one: Recently, a 32-year-old man was booked into the Los Angeles County Jail on DUI charges. His fingerprints revealed not only that he was in the United States illegally but that he had previously been deported after his conviction for killing a child in 1997.
Both men were identified through the Secure Communities program. Under the program, local law enforcement agencies send the fingerprints of those they arrest to the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, where they are cross-checked against Department of Justice records to identify criminal aliens. The program enables law enforcement agencies to identify criminals who are here illegally and allows the federal government to target those who have committed serious crimes for deportation so they no longer pose a threat to our communities.
In Los Angeles County, the Sheriff’s Department also participates with ICE in a program known as 287g. Since 2006, that program has identified more than 20,000 criminal illegal immigrants here.
In both programs, it is not the Sheriff’s Department that instigates deportation proceedings: That is the role of the federal government. We provide information; ICE decides whether to act on it.
Both programs have drawn fire recently from groups concerned that they infringe on civil rights and that people arrested but not ultimately charged could end up being deported. The groups have expressed concern that the programs might lead to racial profiling or intimidate law-abiding residents who would be reluctant to cooperate with law enforcement to solve crimes. In San Francisco, the sheriff has vowed to release low-level offenders back into the community at the end of their terms, even if ICE has placed a hold on them.
These concerns are misplaced, and they put communities at risk. The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, working in conjunction with the Board of Supervisors, implemented the 287g program years ago, and we were also early adopters of Secure Communities; we have not had significant problems.
We did have a serious problem, however, before implementing the programs. We had a growing number of criminal illegal immigrants who were taken into custody and eventually had to be released back onto our streets.
Many other local police agencies have seen the same kind of success we have with the program. About 1,200 state and local law enforcement jurisdictions in 42 states are now participating in the Secure Communities program. Because of this, more than 72,445 aliens convicted of crimes have been identified and deported. That number includes 26,473 criminals convicted of aggravated felonies such as murder, rape, kidnapping or the sexual abuse of children. From October 2008 to October 2010, Secure Communities helped ICE increase by 71% the number of convicted criminals deported.
Arresting officials are not deputized to enforce immigration laws. They are simply doing what they have always done. The only difference is that under Secure Communities, the fingerprints they take during the booking process are run through FBI and Department of Homeland Security databases.
Across the United States, sheriffs and police chiefs have voiced their support for this program. As law enforcers, it is our job to use all available resources to protect citizens and uphold the rule of law. Like members of Congress and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, I see the removal of criminal illegal immigrants as a top priority in securing both the nation and our communities.
Lee Baca has been sheriff of Los Angeles County since 1998.
The Lone Star state suffers from too much illegal alien crime. Authorities say the number of crimes committed by illegal aliens is rising. In addition, the problem of unlawful entry is multiplied by having the longest border — 1,254 miles.
Because this is a local story, there are some interesting facts specific to Texas, such as the crossing of 1600 illegal alien Indians last year. Who knew?
(In a recent hearing, Texas Department of Public Safety director Steve McCraw said there have been 22 murders, 24 assaults, 15 shootings and five kidnappings in Texas linked to Mexican cartels since 2010.)
AUSTIN, Texas — As Washington refuses to agree on a federal immigration policy, violent illegal immigrants from around the world are committing crimes in Texas. They are putting a strain on both the criminal justice system and the state budget.
“It is the result of poor policies allowing violent illegal immigrants to come into this country,” said Williamson County Prosecutor John Bradley.
Over the past year, Bradley has prosecuted two murders in Cedar Park involving illegal Hondurans. In one case, a man raped and murdered a nine-year-old girl. The second killed his wife.
“We caught these two individuals and punished them,” Bradley said. “But that should never happen again.”
But it is happening. In some cases, Bradley has seen the same offenders returning to Texas to re-offend.
Unlike legal citizens who offend, lawmakers and others believe that crimes committed by illegal immigrants may be more preventable through tougher policies at the border.
The topic recently came to light during Governor Perry’s re-election campaign. In a television ad the wife of a Houston policeman killed by an illegal immigrant implied that her husband’s murder could have been prevented, had Perry’s opponent been tougher on criminal immigrants.
Some lawmakers say the problem would not be so bad if ICE had more staffing. ICE is the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency of the federal government.
U.S. Representative Michael McCaul believes the size of ICE should be doubled.
Last year, more than 1,600 illegal immigrants from India crossed into Texas and overwhelmed the courts and jails in the Rio Grande Valley. Waves of immigrants have also come from Brazil and China.
Rep. McCaul is concerned that ICE can no longer deport all offenders.
“And they will tell me that we don’t have the resources to deport everyone in this country who is here illegally,” McCaul said. “Being in a border state, it is starting, I think, to pose a greater risk to our security.”
Then, there is question of cost and what taxpayers must spend.
According to ICE, nearly 10,000 inmates in Texas prisons have a detainer, which means their legal status is in question. They account for nearly 15 percent of the total prison population, and each cost about $18,000 a year to feed, house, care for, and even educate. Continue reading this article
Norwegian MP Christian Tybring-Gjedde is shown in the following video making a strong statement in defense of Western values of “science, secularity, democracy, equal worth, equality, pluralism and freedom.” He doesn’t mention Islam or Muslims, but he makes it clear that “non-western immigrants” are the problem with the new diversity.
KitmanTV helpfully included the transcript/translation:
THIS week President Obama toured the Southwest, in part to promote what he claims are federal advances in border security. But he has said little about the lawsuits by his administration and the American Civil Liberties Union against Arizona’s immigration law, passed just over a year ago but still unenforced, thanks to a federal injunction.
The law requires law enforcement to check the immigration status of anyone arrested for a crime if there is reasonable suspicion that the person is in this country illegally; it also allows them to cite illegal immigrants for failing to carry documents required under federal law, whether they’ve committed a crime or not.
As the fight over the law, Senate Bill 1070, carries on — Gov. Jan Brewer has petitioned the Supreme Court to hear the case — violent crime rooted in unchecked illegal immigration continues to spread here in southern Arizona. It makes me wonder if the lawyers, judges and politicians involved grasp what it is like to be a law enforcement officer on the Mexican border.
As sheriff of Cochise County I am responsible, along with my 86 deputies, for patrolling 83.5 miles of that border, as well as the 6,200 square miles of my county to the north of it — an area more than four times the size of Long Island. Continue reading this article
President Obama on Tuesday encouraged Congress to move forward on immigration reform, saying his administration has “strengthened border security beyond what many believed was possible.” But most voters don’t share the president’s view.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 30% of Likely U.S. Voters think the U.S. border with Mexico is even somewhat secure, while 64% disagree and say it is not secure. These results include only three percent (3%) who say the U.S.-Mexico border is Very Secure and 29% who believe it’s Not At All Secure. (To see survey question wording, click here.)
Fifty-one percent (51%) of Democrats say the border is secure. Eighty-six percent (86%) of Republicans and 65% of voters not affiliated with either of the major parties disagree.
Even voters in the president’s own party are evenly divided when asked if the border is now secure enough to allow the immigration debate to focus on the illegal immigrants already in the country. Sixty-five percent (65%) of Republicans and the plurality (48%) of unaffiliated voters say the border is not yet that secure.
Fifty-three percent (53%) of voters say the U.S. military should be used along the border with Mexico to prevent illegal immigration. That’s down 14 points from 67% last May. Twenty-nine percent (29%) now oppose the use of the military, while 18% are undecided.
Seventy-eight percent (78%) of voters say they have followed news reports about the issue of illegal immigration at least somewhat closely, with 41% who have followed Very Closely.
Most Political Class voters believes the border with Mexico is secure, while 76% of those in the Mainstream disagree.
ATLANTA (AP) — Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal, calling it “a rather historic moment,” on Friday signed a bill that cracks down on illegal immigration in the state by increasing some enforcement powers and requiring many employers to check the immigration status of new hires.
“While I believe immigration is an issue that can ideally be identified and addressed — and should be addressed— at the federal level, this legislation I believe is a responsible step forward in the absence of federal action,” Deal told reporters who crowded elbow-to-elbow into his office for the signing.
The new law — the subject of heated debate in the Legislature — shares some similarities to a controversial law enacted last year in Arizona and another enacted this year in Utah. Part or all of those two laws have been blocked by federal judges, and opponents have said they’ll sue to try to block Georgia’s law.
It authorizes law enforcement officers to check the immigration status of certain suspects and to detain them if they are in the country illegally. It penalizes people who knowingly transport or harbor illegal immigrants and makes it a felony to present false documents or information when applying for a job.
A group of about 20 protesters, their arms linked to form a human chain, stood outside the governor’s office after the signing chanting “Shame on you” and “We won’t leave” before moving outside to join another several dozen on the sidewalk outside the Capitol for an impromptu rally. They are planning a town hall meeting Friday evening and are also pulling together plans for a summer of action, including a work stoppage on July 1, the day most parts of the law are set to take effect, and a march in Atlanta the following day.
“HB 87 was signed today, but our work continues,” Lisa Adler of Amnesty International told the crowd gathered outside the Capitol.
A requirement for private employers to use a federal database called E-Verify to check the immigration status of new hires is set to be phased in, with all employers with more than 10 employees required to comply by July 2013. Continue reading this article
That hopey-changey thing offered by candidate Obama has not worked out so well in actual practice for black Americans. The President feels sure of their loyalty to him no matter what, so he confidently continues to work for a mass amnesty of illegal aliens which would enormously increase an already flooded pool of legal workers.
When the economy was booming and business said it needed more foreign worker bees, Congress complied with additional visas of various categories. But now, with over 20 million Americans underemployed or out of work entirely, there is no parallel response in Washington. In fact, the President’s amnesty scheme would worsen the pain of unemployed citizens by increasing the number of workers competing for each available job.
Amnesty boosters live in a different universe where actual facts do not matter and political tom-foolery is spun up out of fables like America’s need for workers in some dim future. Mainstream economic prognosticators say some of the long-term unemployed may never work again. Even so, amnesty cheerleaders think America should stock up on millions of spare immigrants just in case.
America doesn’t need millions more excess workers, either from legal immigration or a massive amnesty for foreign lawbreakers.
If the election of America’s first African-American president was expected to give blacks an economic boost, it hasn’t emerged yet. Indeed, the percentage of African-American men with a job has dropped to its lowest level since records began in 1972, according to the government’s monthly jobs report released last week.
Even as the economy added a better-than-expected 244,000 jobs, the percentage of black males over 20 who are currently employed dropped slightly to 56.9, the Labor Department’s April report shows. For whites, the equivalent figure is 68.1 percent.
Before this recession, the percentage of black adult men with a job had never dropped below 60 percent, according to Labor Department statistics.
And among blacks, it’s not just men who are suffering. Just 51.5 percent of African-Americans across the board–compared to 59.5 percent of whites–have a job, the numbers show. That’s the lowest level for blacks since 1984. (That group includes 16- to 19-year-olds, who are employed at a far lower rate than their elders.)
These employment rates are calculated differently from the top-line unemployment rate, which includes only those actively looking for work, and inched back up last month to 9 percent.
Heather Boushey, an economist with the liberal Center for American Progress, told The Lookout it’s not just African-Americans who have been hit particularly hard. It’s also other traditionally struggling groups, such as ex-offenders and those without a college degree.
“Anyone who would be last on an employer’s list to get a job is really in bad shape” in the current downturn, Boushey said.
And employers’ hiring practices may be making the problem worse. As we’ve reported, online job listings telling the unemployed not to apply have proliferated in recent years. The federal government is currently probing whether such listings illegally discriminate against African Americans, who are disproportionately likely to be among the jobless.
Nonetheless, much of the media has focused on the travails of educated white men–still a comparatively flourishing group–during the downturn.
Fair Use: This site contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues related to culture and mass immigration. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, see: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000107----000-.html. In order to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.