Sequester Savings: Jailbird Illegal Aliens Released into America

This just in, from the government that wants us to trust them to run a mega amnesty program for millions: an unspecified number of detained aliens have been freed rather than deported.

It’s an indication that the Obama administration intends to intensify the pain of the sequester rather than make prudent cuts that won’t cause trouble for Americans. After all, the point is to blame Republicans because they won’t go along with big tax increases. Obama clearly hopes his bash-Republicans strategy will win him the House in 2014, and he is willing to create sequester misery to get there.

Another example is DHS Secretary Napolitano’s warning on Monday that the sequester cuts to her agency will make America more vulnerable to a terrorist attack.

“I don’t think we can maintain the same level of security at all places around the country with sequester compared to without sequester,” she complained.

This tactic is an escalation of the so-called Washington Monument strategy, explained by Byron York in a Feb 21 column, Budget hawks question Pentagon’s doomsday scenarios:

There’s no doubt President Obama is using the so-called Washington Monument maneuver in the fight with Republicans over sequestration budget cuts. It’s a time-honored tactic of bureaucratic warfare: When faced with cuts, pick the best-known and most revered symbol of government and threaten to shut it down. Close the Washington Monument and say, “See? This is what happens when you cut the budget.” Meanwhile, all sorts of other eminently cuttable government expenditures go untouched.

Does the Obama gang hope that a jihadist attack might occur during the sequester time frame to allow even more extreme blaming of Republicans? Is the plan to reduce security to the point where hostiles could enter, or is treasonous jawboning as far as they will go? You have to wonder what the limit is on Obama’s second term arrogance.

Also keep in mind that all this noise and drama is over an amount that isn’t an actual budget cut, but a reduction in the rate of spending increases. It’s hard to imagine the howling that would ensue if the serious cutbacks necessary would ever be taken up.

In face of coming budget cuts, U.S. frees illegal immigrants from custody, Kansas City Star, February 25, 2013

WASHINGTON — The federal government released groups of illegal immigrants from custody across the country Monday at the same time the White House was making its case that impending budget cuts would harm efforts to protect the border and enforce federal immigration laws.

Advocates reported “waves” of illegal immigrants being released from at least three detention centers in Texas, Florida and Louisiana.

U.S. Immigration Customs and Enforcement confirmed the release of some illegal immigrants Monday night but would not say how many or from which detention centers.

“In order to make the best use of our limited detention resources in the current fiscal climate and to manage our detention population under current congressionally mandated levels, ICE has directed field offices to review the detained population to ensure it is in line with available funding,” said ICE spokeswoman Gillian Christensen. “As a result of this review, a number of detained aliens have been released around the country and placed on an appropriate, more cost-effective form of supervised release.” Continue reading this article

San Diego: Somali Immigrants Found Guilty of Terror Funding

In San Diego, some of the local Somalis were gathering up cash to send to jihadis back home — big mistake, since funding terrorism is illegal. The purpose was to finance the al Shabaab bunch, who are trying to institute a sharia government, featuring execution by stoning, death for watching soccer on TV or murder for made-up reasons, like the teen-aged girls shot for being spies or something.

Somali immigrants are apparently very loyal to their homeland, although the real headwaters for Shabaab support in the US has been more in Minnesota, where others have been convicted of illegal funding, plus the dozens who renounced the United States to join armed jihad in Somalia.

The only difference in this case is the locale of the immigrants. They must not have cared for the southern California lifestyle.

Why doe Washington continue to admit such a hostile tribe? Presumably there are many nice people who would like to immigrate to the US and are not interested in killing infidels. Maybe not all diversity is equal.

The latest bunch of convicts includes an imam, supposedly a spiritual leader of the Religion of Peace.

Four Somali immigrants convicted of supporting militants, Reuters, February 22, 2013

Four Somali immigrants, including a popular imam at a San Diego-area mosque, were convicted by a U.S. federal jury on Friday of conspiring to provide material support to an al Qaeda-linked Islamist militia in the Horn of Africa nation.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of California said that the men – the imam, two cab drivers and an employee at a money transmitting business – had conspired to raise and send money to Somali al Shabaab rebels.

Al Shabaab militants want to impose a strict version of Islamic law in war-ravaged Somalia, but have lost significant territory in the southern and central parts of the country in the face of an offensive by African Union troops.

According to the evidence presented at trial, the men conspired to transfer funds from San Diego to Somalia through the Shidaal Express, a now-defunct money transmitting business in San Diego. Continue reading this article

Media: Chinese Cyber Intrusions a Problem, but Red China’s Students Not So Much

The press has recently been full of articles about cyber attacks from Red China hacking into business and government networks to steal vital intellectual property and security secrets. Media outlets from NPR to Fox News have sounded the alarm about an escalated level of hacking intrusions.

Strangely, nobody seems concerned about the thousands of Chinese students who have been flooding our universities. In fact, they are the largest cohort of international students, with 127,628 Chinese attending US universities in the 2009-2010 school year.

The numbers of non-American students has increased generally because strapped colleges have become dependent on the full tuition paid by the foreigners.

In addition, political figures from across the spectrum think America should reward foreign students with an official welcome. For example, candidate Romney said he would “staple a green card to the diploma of someone who gets an advanced degree in America.”

How convenient for spies to be awarded entrance to our nation’s top technology companies! Cyber intrusion could be greatly enhanced by having actual humans physically present and able to pick up ideas before they reach the internet.

Seriously, the naiveté of many Americans about the national security threat of unfriendly immigrants is getting old.

Red China has been spying on the United States for years in various ways. During the trial of the accused spy Chi Mak, it was revealed that China has 3000 front companies in the United States to rip off secrets. China-born Mak himself was described by prosecutors as a “perfect sleeper agent”, who burrowed into the US defense establishment for decades as he rose to a position of high security clearance, ideal for stealing classified military information.

Here’s another pertinent example:

Spies from China, Russia and Iran infect American universities to steal government and corporate secrets, Daily Mail, April 9, 2012

[. . .] However, on the academic spying front, China seems to be the biggest player of them all.

China employs up to 3,000 shell companies that it uses to try to acquire us technology secrets, Bloomberg reports.

It also has an army of student spies. Some of them are merely students who are coerced into spying. Others are plants posing as students — trained foreign operatives with ulterior motives.

Professor Daniel J. Scheeres, who studies aerospace engineering, took on a student named Yu Xiaohong to study with him at the University of Michigan.

Scheeres, who studies the movement and control of spacecraft and objects in space, told Bloomberg Xiaohong listed a Chinese civilian university as her research background.

He never suspected she had ties to the Chinese military. However, on her American university documents, she listed her home as the Academy of Equipment Command & Technology — a college for young Chinese military officers and cadets.

She had also written a lengthy article on upgrading the accuracy of Chinese anti-satellite weapons.

As Yu pressured him to reveal secrets about his research, Scheeres soon realized that her interests who not merely of a civilian nature.

‘It was pretty clear to me that the stuff she was interested in probably had some military satellite-orbit applications,’ he told Bloomberg. Continue reading this article

Krauthammer Flogs Mass Amnesty Again

There’s something about the immigration issue that inspires all kinds of bad craziness. Perhaps it’s the false comparison of law enforcement vs. humanitarian concerns, as if a compassionate society could exist with a squishy legal system. Whatever the cause, even normally reasonable conservatives can go strangely nutty with odd fantasies, particularly the enduring delusion about Mexicans being conservatives at heart.

Charles Krauthammer is a clever fellow who went over to the dark side of anti-sovereignty anarchy after the re-election of Obama which frightened many establishment conservatives.

Krauthammer’s recent column is a curiosity. He still favors the mega amnesty, but without much enthusiasm. He at least mentions the ugly truth in paragraph #4, that the big enchilada of job permits plus no deportation occurs immediately:

They doth protest quite a lot. Especially because on the single most important issue — instant amnesty — there is no real difference between the proposals.

Rubio calls it “probationary legal status.” Obama uses the term “lawful prospective immigrant.” But both would instantly legalize the 11 million illegal immigrants living here today. The moment either bill is signed, the 11 million become eligible for legal residence, the right to work and relief from the prospect of deportation.

That’s right. Don’t be distracted by beltway propaganda:

The work permit IS the amnesty.

Illegals don’t care about a so-called “path to citizenship” — they come for the money, period. One indication of that fact is that only 36 percent of legal Mexicans eligible for US citizenship have become naturalized, about half the rate of all other groups combined. There’s no reason to think the millions of illegal Mexicans feel any different or will want to become Americans.

The rest of Krauthammer’s piece is capitulation. He understands that a disastrous repeat of 1986 is in the offing, but he can’t energize himself to a passionate defense of law and sovereignty. It’s only the country’s survival at stake, after all.

He seems to accept the idea that House Republicans must submit to amnesty or lose in 2014 from Obama ceaselessly beating them up. It’s more likely that a Republican surrender will cause traditional Americans to make other choices in the next election, either stay home or choose a Tea Party challenger in a primary.

Immigration — the lesser of two evils, Washington Post, By Charles Krauthammer, February 21, 2013

The president suggested he would hold off introducing his own immigration bill as long as bipartisan Senate negotiations were proceeding apace — until his own immigration bill mysteriously leaked precisely as bipartisan Senate negotiations were proceeding apace.

A naked political maneuver and a blunt warning to Republicans: Finish that immigration deal in Congress, or I’ll propose something I know you can’t accept — and flog the issue mercilessly next year to win back the House.

John McCain responded (correctly) that President Obama was creating a “cudgel” to gain “political advantage in the next election.” Marco Rubio, a chief architect of the Senate bill, called Obama’s alternative dead on arrival.

They doth protest quite a lot. Especially because on the single most important issue — instant amnesty — there is no real difference between the proposals.

Rubio calls it “probationary legal status.” Obama uses the term “lawful prospective immigrant.” But both would instantly legalize the 11 million illegal immigrants living here today. The moment either bill is signed, the 11 million become eligible for legal residence, the right to work and relief from the prospect of deportation.

Their life in the shadows is over, which is what matters to them above all. Call the status probationary or prospective but, in reality, it is permanent. There is no conceivable circumstance (short of criminality) under which the instant legalization would be revoked.

This is bad policy. It repeats the 1986 immigration reform that legalized (the then) 3 million while promising border enforcement — which was never carried out. Which opened the door to today’s 11 million. And to the next 11 million as soon as the ink is dry on this reform. Continue reading this article

SunTV’s JihadWatch This Week Observes Free Speech Protection in Dearborn and Relativism Elsewhere

It was interesting to hear Michael Coren’s recollections of his home town of Ilford near London and how it had changed from an immigrant town of Europeans to being the home of infamous Muslim pest Anjem Choudary. The latest news from the well known loudmouth was his urging to fellow unfriendly Muslims that they quit their jobs and go on welfare: make the sucker British taxpayer finance Islam’s ordinary treason.

Choudary also bragged on how the Muslim population was growing — due to disastrous immigration, of course.

Coren remarked that his late father would not recognize Ilford now. That’s true of many communities in Britain now.

When joined by Robert Spencer for the JihadWatch segment, they discussed the recent conviction of several Birmingham jihadists who were plotting to bomb and murder as many British people as possible, hoping to rival 9/11.

Their discussion of the week’s hostile Islam news also included some advances in free speech protection in Islamified Dearborn and the deteriorating situation of Egypt’s Coptic Christians.

Philadelphia Burqa Bandit Crime Toted Up

Daniel Pipes is a long-time scholar of Islam who has warned early and often about the intention of Muslims to institute world-wide sharia oppression on free peoples.

Interestingly, his home town of Philadelphia has had a major outbreak of crimes committed by burqa-wearing criminals. Burqas are a fine disguise for thievery, he notes, because it’s easier to ignore them than to confront the wearer.

Below, a security camera photo of a Philadelphia burqa bandit.

Pipes has compiled a blog post about burqa crime from 2006 to the present: Niqabs and Burqas as Security Threats, and it has gotten long over the years.

We have a better word in English for face covering: mask.

A mask connotes bad intent, secretiveness and crime. Showing our faces is part of the social contract of openness about who we are. A free society cannot allow unidentified persons because the masked individual has an advantage over the rest of us because he knows who we are but the reverse is not true.

There’s no reason to allow masks in public, even to celebrate diversity; they should be made illegal, as some states already have.

Furthermore, our culture teaches us to pay close attention to facial expressions — it’s how we judge honesty and emotions.

The purpose of the identical burqa is to erase the personal individuality of women, plus the message that women’s speech is worthless.

Here are the observations of Daniel Pipes, a concerned resident of Philadelphia:

PIPES: When burqas become accessories to crime, Washington Times, February 21, 2013

When it comes to using female Islamic garb as an accessory to crime, Philadelphia, the city where I live, has quietly, unassumedly, become the capital of the Western world.

First, a tutorial on Islamic coverings, all of which tend to be called veils in English, but which fall into three main categories. Some (the abaya, hijab, chador, jilbab or khimar) cover parts of the body, especially the hair, but reveal the face and identity of the woman; some cover the face (the yashmak) but show the body shape; and some hide everything, including the identity and gender of the wearer. The latter — our topic here — is best described as a full-body cover: it in turn has two types, those that cover the person entirely (the chadari or burqa) or those with a slit for the eyes (the haik or niqab).

By my count, the Philadelphia region has had 15 robberies (or attempted robberies) of financial institutions in the past six years in which the thieves relied on an Islamic full-body cover. These took place in January 2007, June 2007, May 2008 (two), October 2009 (two), November 2009, February 2011, June 2011, December 2011, January 2012, March 2012 (two) and April 2012 (two). The most violent one took place on May 3, 2008, when Police Sgt. Stephen Liczbinski was killed in a shootout following a robbery by perpetrators wearing burqas. One of the criminals also died in the exchange.

As David J. Rusin points out in his detailed survey of these crimes, Muslim garb holds two great advantages over other forms of disguise. First, plenty of covered women walk the streets of Philadelphia without criminal intent, thereby providing cover for thieves; the more head coverings around, the more likely it is that head coverings will facilitate criminal activity. Second, the very strangeness and aloofness of these garments affords their wearers an extraordinary degree of protection. As in other cases (notably a farcical purchase of alcohol in Toronto liquor stores by a 14-year-old boy in a burqa), clerks so fear being accused of racism or “Islamophobia” that they skip established methods, such as asking a niqabi to establish her (or his) identity. Continue reading this article

Muslims Threaten Free Speech from Paris to Perth

Free speech is increasingly under attack in the West, due to Muslim immigration, but there has been little media attention given to alarms like the attempted assassination of Danish journalist Lars Hedegaard (pictured) in Copenhagen earlier this month.

A Muslim came to his front door pretending to deliver a package, but instead drew a gun and fired at Hedegaard for his outspoken views in warning against hostile Islam. In January, he began publishing Dispatch International to report the unpleasant news about Muslims in Europe which made him a bigger target for jihadists.

One might think the press would be concerned about censorship, but in general it has been paralyzed in fear, for safety concerns and dread of racism accusations, even though Islam is clearly not a race. During the Danish cartoon controversy of 2006, only a couple American publications actually printed the drawings of Mohammed.

Regarding the Hedegaard assassination attempt, only Canada’s SunTV has paid attention on this side of the Atlantic. You don’t see this sort of coverage on Fox News.

Hedegaard was lucky to escape with his life. But the assault shows what critics of Islam now face. The violence was not an anomaly: artist Kurt Westergaard was also attacked in his home by an axe-wielding Somali for upsetting sensitive Muslims. Lars Vilks has received numerous death threats for his drawings showing Mohammed as a dog.

In Paris, the humor magazine Charlie Hebdo was firebombed in 2011 for a slightly rude issue about Mohammed, yet the publication continues to produce edgy material, notably a cartoon biography of Islam’s prophet.

Here in the United States, cartoonist Mollie Norris of the Seattle Weekly was forced to go into hiding after suggesting the Everybody Draw Mohammed Day in support of free speech.

Another Cassandra is Dutch politician Geert Wilders, who is currently doing a speaking tour through Australia. The speech scheduled for Perth was canceled because the venue pulled out at the last minute: such is the effectiveness of intimidation and threats of violence.

Below is an Aussie press interview in which Wilders expressed his objections to Islam despite rather belligerent questioning. He warned Australians to learn from Europe’s mistake of allowing Muslim immigration.

One bit of good news: Wilders’ speech in Melbourne went ahead on February 19, despite scuffles outside from unfriendlies. Read the text here.

Senator McCain Visits His Constituents, Who Are not Pleased with Amnesty Plans

The Congress is taking another vacation, aka week-long recess, in this case for Presidents’ Day, and some legislators are holding town halls to listen to the concerns of the voters. Senator John McCain held one such in Sun Lakes, Arizona, near Phoenix.

Interestingly, his late pal and amnesty brother Sen. Ted Kennedy was mentioned — he’s gone, but his damage to the nation is not forgotten!

Many of the attendees were not happy with McCain’s amnesty plans.

According to the local reporter, it was a “75-minute town hall dominated by hostile questions about immigration reform.”

The Senator doesn’t like having his ideas questioned by mere citizens, and snarling ensued. He recited the common litany of chores the illegals do, as if having a class of low-paid (but high welfare using) labor was advantageous to Americans, or we owe them or something: “They mow our lawns, they care for our babies, they clean, they wash up…”

McCain fields fiery immigration questions at town hall, CNN, February 19, 2013

Sen. John McCain opened his town hall meeting in Sun Lakes, Arizona, on Tuesday with an invitation to answer “any comments, questions, or insults that you may have.”

He may have gotten what he wished for.

The Arizona Republican fielded spirited questioning from some people in the border state apparently frustrated with slow progress on the illegal immigration issue. Several rose at his forum in support of stringent deportation programs, which McCain does not favor.

“This is an overwhelming experience,” he said to one agitated questioner, telling him to sit down. “You’ve had enough time, sir. You’ve had enough time.”

The senator also spoke on the progress of the bipartisan “Gang of Eight” in the Senate, of which he is a member. They have been working to craft an immigration bill suitable to members of both parties.

Initially, McCain said, “I cannot tell you that I’m sure that we will reach a conclusion,” but later added, “We believe that there is a good, strong possibility that we come up with a plan and a proposal that most Americans would support.” Continue reading this article

Britain: Muslims Exhorted to Mooch Government Benefits for Jihad

Vladimir Lenin famously remarked, “The Capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them.” Britain has gone a step beyond, namely providing generous welfare for self-proclaimed enemies of the nation who have sworn to destroy the traditional society and institute brutal sharia law. Muslim immigration has allowed this travesty to proceed.

News reports have been burbling up for years about moocher Muslims living in luxury, including extra bennies for polygamous wives of Muslims and a raft of welfare goodies for notorious jihad preacher Abu Qatada. The government is too terrified by political correctness to fix it.

(At least we don’t do such stupid things in America. Oh wait, the government is no longer checking prospective immigrants about whether they are likely to become a public charge, aka go on the dole.)

The latest insult is public jihadist Anjem Choudary being filmed saying Muslims should mooch as much as they can from the infidels in order to pursue Islam. He used to occasion to again state the Muslim intention to conquer the West and institute brutal sharia law everywhere. Choudary himself receives £25,000 a year in benefits from the unwilling British taxpayers.

Muslim preacher urges followers to claim ‘Jihad Seeker’s Allowance’, Daily Telegraph, February 17, 2013

A Muslim preacher is secretly filmed urging followers to take benefits from the state to fund a holy war.

Anjem Choudary was secretly filmed mocking non-Muslims for working in 9-5 jobs their whole lives, and told followers that some revered Islamic figures had only ever worked one or two days a year.

“The rest of the year they were busy with jihad [holy war] and things like that,” he said. “People will say, ‘Ah, but you are not working’.

“But the normal situation is for you to take money from the kuffar [non-believers].

“So we take Jihad Seeker’s Allowance. You need to get support.”

He went on to tell a 30-strong crowd: “We are going to take England — the Muslims are coming.”

Ridiculing the daily lives of UK workers, Choudary said: “You find people are busy working the whole of their life. They wake up at 7 o’clock. They go to work at 9 o’clock.

“They work for eight, nine hours a day. They come home at 7 o’clock, watch EastEnders, sleep, and they do that for 40 years of their life. That is called slavery.”

Choudary, a father-of-four, claims more than £25,000 a year in benefits, £8,000 more than the take-home pay of some soldiers fighting the Taliban in Afghanistan, according to the Sun, which covertly filmed the preacher at three meetings. Continue reading this article

Singaporeans Rally against Increased Immigration

Raza types typically auto-shriek accusations of racism against anyone who advocates American borders and immigration law enforcement. However, dislike of the importation of foreigners is, if not universal, then very common, as shown by the graph. It was a part of the 2007 Pew report titled “World Publics Welcome Global Trade — but Not Immigration”. A 2011 investigation from the Ipsos pollsters shows similar attitudes.

Everybody likes their own tribe the best. It’s human nature, from Sacramento to Singapore.

Singaporeans protest plans to increase immigration, CNN, February 16, 2013

Singaporeans don’t normally gather in public protest. Decades of single party rule and an iron hand when it comes to dissent has shaped a somewhat meek public. But a proposal by the government to allow more immigrants to come to Singapore in the next few decades to make up for a population shortfall has emboldened citizens to go public.

On Saturday, several thousand Singaporeans gathered in a small downtown park near an area known as “Speaker’s Corner” to vent their anger. Organizers estimated the crowd to between 3,000 and 4,000 and said it was the largest gathering since post-independence Singapore in 1965. Singapore police told CNN they don’t give crowd estimates.

At the heart of the issue is a so-called “White Paper on Population” recently issued by the government that proposes allowing the population to rise from 5.3 million to as high as 6.9 million by 2030 in order to keep the economy growing and to keep it a magnet country for business.

The government also says foreigners are needed to take care of the country’s own rapidly aging population.

Protesters on Saturday insisted they didn’t fear foreigners but worry about the loss of Singaporean jobs to foreigners, depressed wages and overcrowding that has taxed Singapore’s infrastructure, including housing and transportation. Protesters also say the government’s plans will make them a minority in their own country.

“Imagine a place where you can be a stranger in your own home,” a protester said.

Like many developed nations, not enough people are having babies. For more than three decades, the country’s fertility rate has been below replacement level, meaning Singaporeans aren’t having enough babies to replace themselves. This has had a huge impact on a tiny country striving to be a booming economy.

The government has relied on foreigners to fill executive ranks, as well as to perform low-wage jobs from construction to cleaning. While the country is one of the world’s wealthiest, it also has an enormous income disparity between rich and poor. Protesters say Singaporeans would have more babies if they were more confident of their economic prospects, and that the government should rely less on cheaper foreign labor and improve the wages of Singaporeans.

Senators Sessions and Vitter Warn against Repeating 1986 Amnesty

There was no statute of limitations in the promises made in the 1986 Reagan Amnesty, so we citizens are still owed the promises made 27 years ago, namely border and workplace security.

Even so, the open-borders diversity-first faction that rules Washington has rolled out a carbon copy of the 1986 law, and expect foolish Republicans to fall into line. Sadly, many have.

But not Senator Jeff Sessions, who was a whistle-blower against earlier amnesties and is a leader for sovereignty now.

On February 15, Senators Sessions and David Vitter cautioned against a repeat of the 1986 amnesty. In no other legislation has the gap between promises and execution been more vast, the two agreed.

Rasmussen Poll: Nearly Half Think Too Fast Growth Is Worse Than Too Slow

Among elites in Washington, population growth of any kind, even of stubbornly retro third-worlders, is preferable to a sustainable society. The reason is simple: expanding population causes GNP to rise, which looks good, even as per capita income of the citizens decreases. The idea of the country being full never occurs.

Yet even without a strong environmentalist voice reminding people of the limits of the planet to replenish natural resources, nearly half of poll respondents said too rapid population growth is worse than too slow. (Environmentalists are uncomfortable with population topics generally, and even more so when excessive immigration is connected with environmental harm.)

On U.S. Population Growth, 47% Think Too Fast Is Worse Than Too Slow Rasmussen Reports, February 15, 2013

While demographers ponder the impact of the nation’s declining birth rate, Americans worry more about a population that grows too fast rather than one that grows too slow. Only 25% of American Adults believe a population that is growing too slowly is a bigger problem for the United States than one that is growing too fast. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that nearly twice as many (47%) disagree and think a population that is growing too fast is a bigger problem for the country. Twenty-eight percent (28%) are undecided.

Here in California, fingers are crossed that the seasonal rains will start up again to replenish the snowpack and reservoirs. After a gangbusters fall season of rainfall, the faucet turned off in January. It doesn’t help that the state’s population has skyrocketed in recent decades, caused mostly by immigrants and their offspring. Water restrictions now come more frequently, as authorities try to temper the demand part of the equation, since little can be done about supply.

There are many reasons to object to excessive population growth, like not having enough jobs for the current residents. Since much of the growth is propelled by immigration, legal and illegal, citizens are rightly concerned about the cultural change in their communities and that the engine of assimilation is overwhelmed. Plus, while business loves the increased economic activity connected with millions more shoppers, the taxpayers must pay the billions of dollars in cost for new infrastructure and social services.

Page 106 of 217« First...102030...104105106107108...120130140...Last »