MS-13 Gang Is Reported on TV Doc

If a government wanted to create a fertile field where criminal gangs could flourish, then promoting massive legal and illegal immigration of diverse groups would be just the ticket. Young immigrants and the US-born children desire the sense of belonging and physical protection that gang membership provides in a strange land.

The Biography Channel recently showed a piece on Salvadoran MS-13 gangsters in the US. The episode (Gang World: MS-13) is posted on YouTube (below) but may not last long.

It describes the immigration beginning of MS-13 (aka Mara Salvatrucha): when Salvadorans started arriving in hispanic neighborhoods several decades ago, they weren’t welcomed but were seen as prey by established criminal gangs. So the Maras created their own band of criminal enforcers.

And the culture they want to protect includes a fondness for machetes, which they use for both chopping wood and slitting throats. Since there are so many flavors of gangs, the MS-13 gangsters seek to distinguish themselves by extreme violence.

Victims are not merely other gang members however. The San Francisco triple murder of the Bologna family was committed by a Mara shooter, as were the three black college students shot down in a Newark schoolyard.

Isn’t diversity nice? We are so enriched.

Germany: Nest of Hostile Muslims Is Noticed

Thilo Sarrazin stirred up a hornet’s nest in Germany when he warned of Muslim immigration in a book (Deutschland Shafft Sich Ab — Germany Does Away with Itself) that quickly became a huge national best-seller.

Oh no, said the diversity enthusiasts, the Muslims of Germany are only four million, just five percent of the population. And they enrich German society with their colorful Islamic customs.

Now a news report from the weekly Die Welt is calling attention to a growing radical Islamist group in the state of Hesse.

One of that bunch appears in the video below, hoping to incite terrorism in Germany. He apparently didn’t get the memo that Islam is a “Religion of Peace.”

This is the threat that Islamic immigration brings to the west.

The Gates Of Vienna blog posted a translation of Die Welt’s April 24 article:

Hesse turning into a center for radical Salafists

An ever increasing number of radical Islamists gather in Hesse. A prominent figure among them is Mohamed Mahmoud, who openly incites against Germany. It seems that the authorities have their hands tied. Florian Flade reports.

“Allah willing we will conquer Rome! And them St. Peter’s square will be the place where punishments in the name of Allah will be carried out,” The man with the military vest and the traditional Pashtun wool cap says.

“Explain to your children what jihad is! Tell them about Guantánamo, about Gaza, tell them that! So they will grow up with hatred towards the Kuffar (unbelievers)”, says the somewhat bull-like preacher with shoulder-length curly haired, thus sharpening his audience’s mood.

One might think that sermons such as these come from the mountains of Afghanistan. But the man who preaches them lives in the middle of Germany, specifically in the Hessian Odenwald. His name is Mohamed Mahmoud, but he calls himself “Abu Usama al-Gharib.” Security authorities see in the 26-year-old Austrian a spiritual arsonist, a pioneer of Islamic terror.

Mahmoud preaches a form of radical Islam which glorifies jihad against “infidels”, and openly calls Al Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden a hero.

Intelligence agencies and politicians are alarmed

Intelligence agencies and politicians are alarmed that radical Islamist preachers like Mahmoud have recently increased in numbers in Hesse. Groups and individuals from Islamic circles are establishing an increasingly wide net Between Kassel and Darmstadt. Continue reading this article

Buffalo: Somali Refugee Beats Stepson to Death

This crime is particularly disturbing since the 10-year-old victim had called the police on at least two occasions asking to be protected from his violent stepfather, Somali refugee Ali Mohamad Mohamud.

You have to wonder whether police were too politically correct to intervene in a Somali family matter. When diversity is in play, authorities are sometimes afraid to act properly because they might be accused of racism and insensitivity toward tribal behavior.

Somalis have stubbornly resisted assimilation more than most other immigrant groups. Furthermore, Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s books about growing up Somali made clear that violence in families was a social norm.

On April 17, the stepfather tied up 10-year-old Abdifatah Mohamud, stuffed a sock in his mouth and struck him 70 times with a rolling pin.

The dead boy was described by teachers as a bright kid and a star in the fifth grade. He was certainly smart enough to phone 911 twice to complain of abuse to police, but he got no help. Just hours before the beating death, a neighbor recalled the boy running down the street, trying to escape his stepfather.

Interestingly, the 40-year-old Somali refugee stepdad worked as a security guard for the Buffalo newspaper where he got mostly positive reviews from the astute reporters ( News employees try to reconcile friendly guard with suspected killer).

Boy, 10, Allegedly Beaten to Death by Stepfather Had Made 911 Calls for Help, ABC News, April 27, 2012

Police are investigating the death of a 10-year-old New York boy who had called 911 to report abuse several times over the past two years before his stepfather allegedly beat him to death last week.

On the night of April 17, Ali Mohamad Mohamud tied up his stepson Abdifatah Mohamud, stuffed a sock in his mouth, covered it with duct tape and then beat the boy to death, Buffalo, N.Y., police told ABC News affiliate WKBW.

An autopsy showed that the fifth grader died after being hit more than 70 times with a rolling pin.

Mohamud was arrested and is now facing second-degree murder charges, police told He is being held in jail while he waits for a grand jury date to be set.

Since then, it has been revealed that Ali had made at least two phone calls to 911 to report that his Somali stepfather was hurting him, according to WKBW. Continue reading this article

‪Rumors of War III: Target U.S.‬

A new documentary from GBTV warns of infiltration of the Muslim Brotherhood and Hezbollah into the United States.

Philadelphia: Burqa Bandit Remains at Large

In Philadelphia, burqa diversity is behind a crime wave including five bank robberies and one murder. The all-covering Muslim sack is a very effective criminal disguise because it covers everything, as shown by the surveillance snapshot below.

Unsurprisingly, NPR’s coverage focuses on the hurt feelings and inconvenience of Muslims. There is not a peep of detail about the man who was shot dead. But we hear about how the Allah worshippers are followed around in stores — oh, the cruelty! Public safety likewise is overlooked for NPR’s obsession with cultural sensitivity to diverse immigrants.

Also unmentioned is the simple solution to the growth of this mode of criminal disguise — prohibiting masks in public spaces, as is the law in some places. (See states’ codes here.) The appearance of masks in the public square is the result of ultra-diverse immigration which includes Muslims who don’t want to assimilate.

Americans don’t want unidentifiable persons wandering around the streets breaking whatever law they want. Civic openness is a basic principle of Western culture. Islam, not so much.

Scholar Daniel Pipes has helpfully collected many instances of the crime strategy: Niqabs and Burqas as Security Threats. So the Philadephia Burqa Bandit is not a rare aberration.

Thieves’ Cover-Ups Raise Concerns Among Muslims, National Public Radio, April 27, 2012

The surveillance tape shows what looks like a Muslim woman, her face and body hidden by her traditional clothing, robbing a Philadelphia bank. But the robber in the abaya and khimar is actually a man. He’s part of a recent crime spree involving perpetrators in Muslim garb.

The worst of the incidents happened in Upper Darby when, Police Superintendent Michael Chitwood says, someone who appeared to be a Muslim woman went into a barbershop.

“The holdup man who was … dressed in Muslim female garb, was covered from head to toe. The only thing that was showing was his eyes,” Chitwood says. “He shot and killed the barber in the shop.”

Chitwood says police believe it was a love triangle case — the defendant knew the victim, and an arrest was made. But he says without additional evidence, it would have been tough to identify the perpetrator.

“It just makes me sad that they would, you know, portray our religion in this manner,” local resident Kezia Ridgeway, a Muslim, says.

Ridgeway isn’t covered as much as some women — she usually just drapes a scarf around her hair, sometimes with a long dress, other times pants and a shirt. She and her husband have talked about how the crimes might make people more suspicious of Muslim women.

“You can’t see the face, so you don’t know who’s coming into your store,” Ridgeway says. “It’s really just going to make it hard for Muslim women whether you cover your face or … you cover your head, it’s just going to be something wherein people when they see someone who looks like me, or they see another Muslim woman, they’re going to think negative thoughts.” Continue reading this article

Congressman Ted Poe: Send Convicted Foreign Criminals Home

Some countries in the international community refuse to accept their citizens after they have committed crimes in the US and Washington tries to deport them. That list includes but isn’t limited to Cuba, China, India, Jamaica, Pakistan, Somalia, Iran, Trinidad and Tobago, and Bangladesh.

The brutal murder of five in San Francisco brought this subject up again. The accused killer, Binh Thai Luc (pictured below), had served a prison term for robbery but was not deported because Vietnam refused to take him back. See Accused San Francisco Mass Murderer Was Not Deported to Vietnam. So the crime was totally preventable, but Washington has been weak in dealing with irresponsible nations and thousands of dangerous criminals have been turned loose on American streets as a result.

Congressman Ted Poe (R-TX) has been a leader on the issue of persuading reprobate nations to take back their criminals, and he discussed his strategy recently on Fox News. His legislation is H.R. 3256: Deport Convicted Foreign Criminals Act.

Supremes Sound Friendly to Arizona's Immigration Enforcement Law

Even liberal news outlets observed that Wednesday’s oral arguments over parts of Arizona’s SB 1070 law did not favor the Obama position of attacking states’ immigration enforcement.

The Washington Post headline was Arizona immigration law: Supreme Court seems receptive to parts of crackdown. The New York Times‘ banner was Justices Seem Sympathetic to Central Part of Arizona Law. National Public Radio observed: Justices Signal Support For Arizona Immigration Law.

So the arguments must have gone well for the friends of American sovereignty and states’ rights.

UPDATE: Read the Supreme Court Transcript of the oral arguments.

Immigration enforcement law expert Kris Kobach made a few remarks outside the court to the crowd assembled.

Interestingly, Solicitor General Donald Verelli voiced concern over foreign relations if SB 1070 were to stand, but no similar regard was reported from him for the danger to public safety if alien criminals continue to pour in.

Supreme Court casts doubt on Obama’s immigration law claim, Washington Times, April 25, 2012

Supreme Court justices took a dim view of the Obama administration’s claim that it can stop Arizona from enforcing immigration laws, telling government lawyers during oral argument Wednesday that the state appears to want to push federal officials, not conflict with them.

The court was hearing arguments on Arizona’s immigration crackdown law, which requires police to check the immigration status of those they suspect are in the country illegally, and would also write new state penalties for illegal immigrants who try to apply for jobs.

The Obama administration has sued, arguing that those provisions conflict with the federal government’s role in setting immigration policy, but justices on both sides of the aisle struggled to understand that argument.

“It seems to me the federal government just doesn’t want to know who’s here illegally,” Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. said at one point. Continue reading this article

Accused Illegal Alien Killer of Jamiel Shaw Goes to Trial

After four years, the murder of high school student Jamiel Shaw (shown below) by an illegal alien gangster is finally coming to trial.

There is no better example of the government’s permissive treatment of illegal alien criminals than this crime. The accused killer, Pedro Espinoza, had been held in the LA jail on a gun charge and was a known gangster and illegal, yet was released to Los Angeles streets instead of being deported. Espinoza is charged with murdering Shaw on the day following his release. Had Espinoza been properly deported as the law requires, then he would not have been in this country to kill.

Jamiel Shaw murder case sees jury selection, KABC Los Angeles, April 24, 2012

LOS ANGELES (KABC) — Jury selection began on Tuesday morning in the trial of Pedro Espinoza, who is accused in the shooting death of Los Angeles High School football player Jamiel Shaw.

About 80 jurors are expected Tuesday and Wednesday, and 24 have already been excused. Once the trial begins, it is expected to last up to four weeks.

Shaw’s family was present in the court room, and they say they hope the case will reignite the immigration debate as it did when Shaw was first killed.

Shaw, 19, was shot once in the head while on the sidewalk outside his home four years ago. Espinoza, a known gang member and illegal immigrant, was also 19 when he allegedly gunned down Shaw.

The crime sparked outrage from the community. Shaw was a star running back at Los Angeles High School who had lead his team to a league title. He was also attracting scholarship attention from schools like Stanford and Rutgers at the time of his death.

Espinoza had just been released from the L.A. County Jail on a gun charge the day before Shaw was killed. Shaw’s family says if Espinoza had been deported because of his illegal status, Shaw would still be alive.

The family tried but failed to get a law passed that would allow police to arrest gang members if they are in the country illegally. However the LAPD has an established policy against stopping people based on their immigration status. But the family will attempt to put the measure back up for a vote.

“With Jamiel’s Law, it just specifies illegal alien gang members, they won’t even support that,” Jamiel Shaw Sr., the teen’s father. “The illegal immigration thing is so messed up now…There’s no reason not to go after gang members in the country [who are] illegally committing crime.”

Jamiel Shaw Sr. plans to take the stand in the trial if called upon. He was at his son’s side moments after he was shot. The teen’s mother has served in Iraq and is on her way home from Texas.

Espinoza could face the death penalty if he is convicted.

Arizona Immigration Enforcement Is Debated on C-SPAN

C-SPAN’s morning call-in program Washington Journal had Dan Stein (Federation for American Immigration Reform) and Ali Noorani (National Immigration Forum) to debate the merits of the Arizona immigration enforcement law Tuesday, since the Supreme Court is about to hear the case challenging the legislation’s constitutionality.

There were many well informed viewer calls.

Polls Show Continuing American Approval of Arizona's Immigration Enforcement Law, despite Media Campaign of Lies

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear arguments about the constitutionality of parts of Arizona’s SB1070.

Legality aside for the time being, one fascinating theme is how the legislation received two years of the most vicious attacks from the liberal media and other interested parties:

Eugene Robinson of the Washington Post wrote, “Arizona’s draconian new immigration law is an abomination — racist, arbitrary, oppressive, mean-spirited, unjust.”

The President said the legislation would “undermine basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans” as he hinted a mega-amnesty was his choice rather than law and borders.

MSNBC pundit Joe Scarborough compared the law to Nazi guards asking to see your papers.

Liberal cities like San Francisco and Los Angeles voted to boycott Arizona.

Even Communist Cuba got its licks in, calling the law “xenophobic”. . . a “brutal violation of human rights.”

The level of vitriol has been odd, considering that SB 1070 was carefully written to mirror federal statutes. Legal immigrants are required to carry their “papers” at all times.

Arizona was desperate because it needed help from Washington to get the border under control but the Obama administration was not forthcoming for fear of angering hispanics. Meanwhile Mexican cartels had taken over a large swath of southern Arizona and were busy turning the place into northern Mexico.

Yet even with the tsunami of ferocious denunciations, the American people have remained strong in their support for the law despite the accusations that they were evil racists for doing so.

Shortly after the signing of the bill into law in April 2010, 70 percent of Arizona voters approved of the measure. National surveys the following month were also supportive, like the CBS/New York Times poll in which 60 percent of respondents thought the law was about right or they would have preferred tougher.

Two intervening years have not dimmed Americans’ fondness for Arizona’s courage and self-determination:

59% Favor Automatic Immigration Checks During All Traffic Stops, Rasmussen Reports, April 23, 2012

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday on the controversial immigration law first passed in Arizona two years ago, and a majority of voters nationwide still agree with one of the law’s chief provisions.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 59% believe police should automatically check the immigration status of individuals they pull over for a traffic violation. One-in-three (32%) opposes such a rule.

And. . .

Fox News poll: Majority of voters favor Arizona immigration law, Fox News, April 20, 2012

By a more than two-to-one margin, American voters favor the 2010 Arizona immigration law.

A Fox News poll released Friday shows 65 percent of voters favor the controversial law, while 31 percent oppose it.

Eighty-four percent of Republicans favor Arizona’s law, while 46 percent of Democrats do. A 51-percent majority of Democrats opposes the law.

Click here for the full poll results.

Independents favor the law by a 40 percentage-point margin (67-27 percent). That’s good news for presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney, who has said he thinks Arizona’s law would be a good model for the rest of the country.

The Arizona law took effect in July 2010. It makes illegal immigration a state crime and allows local law enforcement to question the legal status of anyone stopped on suspicion of a crime and detain anyone who cannot prove his or her immigration status.

The Justice Department filed suit challenging it, and the U.S. Supreme Court hears arguments next Wednesday on whether many of the law’s key provisions are constitutional.

Voters who live in the West (72 percent) and the Midwest (69 percent) are more likely than those living in other regions (61 percent) to approve of the Arizona law.

The Fox News poll is based on landline and cellphone interviews with 910 randomly-chosen registered voters nationwide and is conducted under the joint direction of Anderson Robbins Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R) from April 9-11.  For the total sample, it has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points.

Muslim Gang Sentenced for Raping Children to Celebrate Eid

In a London courtroom, several Muslim men were assigned various prison terms of up to 11 years for kidnapping and raping two teenaged girls as a part of the males’ Eid festivities.

Muslim immigration practically guarantees diminished safety for women and girls. As feminist Hege Storhaug observed when asked about the effects of Muslim immigration:

“There is no doubt that the freedom, the level of freedom I had as a young woman, young women in Norway will not have, and don’t have actually today and they will not have it in the future, as far as I can see. So the freedom for women in Europe is going backwards.”

“Girls in school, they are mocked by Muslim boys and they dye their hair black, yes. Blondes are dying their hair black, that is correct. And some of them also move to other parts of Oslo to be let alone.”

Under Islam, women are treated lower than dirt generally, and western women and girls are seen as available for Islamic predation because Muslims think they are superior beings, despite all evidence to the contrary.

Muslim gang jailed for kidnapping and raping two girls as part of their Eid celebrations, Daily Mail, April 20, 2012

A group of Muslim men who abducted and raped two teenage girls as part of their Eid celebrations laughed in court yesterday as they were jailed for a total of 38 years.

The girls, aged 15 and 16, were lured miles from their home to a dingy hostel.

In a horrifying weekend-long ordeal, they were plied with alcohol and repeatedly raped by two men, Shamrez Rashid and Amar Hussain, before being offered to a number of others who also ‘used them for sex’.

The 16-year old was forced to have sex six times with four different men.
The younger victim was raped by one man and then sexually assaulted by another.

One defendant, Rashid, 20, was said to have claimed the girls had enjoyed the sex, which he said had taken place as they celebrated the Muslim festival of Eid.

‘It was Eid,’ he said. ‘We treated them as our guests. OK, so they gave us [sex] but we were buying them food and drink.

‘They could have anything they wanted. They enjoyed it.’

His accomplice Amar Hussain, 22, claimed the girls were ‘slags’.

But Judge Melbourne Inman QC said the girls had still been children at the time of the offences.

He said it was quite obvious they had been frightened of the men, but this had had ‘no effect at all’ on their attackers’ behaviour.

‘They were still children and still living with their families,’ Judge Inman said. ‘In a civilised society, such people should be helped. You all abused them.

‘They were extremely vulnerable and you took advantage of that.’

The five defendants laughed and smirked as the horrifying details of their offences were described in court yesterday.

Rashid – who had already been found guilty of two rapes, an attempted rape, child abduction and an attempted sexual assault – grinned, laughed and made gun gestures in the dock. Continue reading this article

Diversity against Women (Britain): 100,000 Girls Physically Mutilated by FGM

Opening the doors to hostile Muslim immigration has brought an array of crime, terror and cruelty to the UK. Brutality toward women and girls is an Islamic specialty, shown by the rape epidemic in Norway, forced marriage for children, a death sentence for learning to read and honor killing for normal expressions of individuality.

The following article characterizes female genital mutilation (FGM) as cultural rather than a religious practice accepted by Islam. But Robert Spencer points out that that Islam justifies FGM and it does so in writing.

100,000 British women mutilated, Daily Telegraph, April 22, 2012

As many as 100,000 women in Britain have undergone female genital mutilations with medics in the UK offering to carry out the illegal procedure on girls as young as 10, it has been reported.

Investigators from The Sunday Times said they secretly filmed a doctor, dentist and alternative medicine practitioner who were allegedly willing to perform circumcisions or arrange for the operation to be carried out. The doctor and dentist deny any wrongdoing.

The practice, which involves the surgical removal of external genitalia and in some cases the stitching of the vaginal opening, is illegal in Britain and carries up to a 14 year prison sentence.

It is also against the law to arrange FGM.

Known as “cutting”, the procedure is traditionally carried out for cultural reasons and is widespread across Africa.

It is thought to be needed as proof of a girl’s “purity” for when she marries, but victims are rarely given anaesthetic and frequently suffer long-term damage and pain. Continue reading this article