Ann Coulter: America Shouldn’t Welcome Terrorists as Immigrants

Judge Jeanine Pirro is generally pretty sharp on her Fox News show, so it was disappointing to see her interrupt guest Ann Coulter recently as she was making an important point about the worsening snooper state. Coulter was connecting the dots between the need for more surveillance in America and the permissive immigration which has allowed our enemies to live among us. But Judge Jeanine wanted to talk about the little drone gizmo on her desk, so a vital topic was sidelined.

COULTER: The reason we need them [drones], is that the immigration service isn’t doing their job. When we talk about spying on American citizens, it’s always “American citizen Anwar al-Awlaki.” Yeah, okay, they are technically American citizens like these Chechnians were American citizens…

JUDGE JEANINE: Yeah but I’m worried about, I’m having a barbecue at my house, do I have to worry about a drone…

Borders exist to keep out enemies as well as define the national territory. But under the liberal multicultural philosophy, we’re all one diverse one-worlder family, and the concept of “enemy” is too old-fashioned for our modern 21st century. Unfortunately the jihadists have a different idea of a utopian future, where we infidels will be forced to surrender to the rule of Allah and submission to the Koran will be the principle of governance. Muslim immigration is turning Europe into Eurabia before our eyes. Why doesn’t America see what happens when historic enemies of liberty are admitted as immigrants by the millions?

Coulter stuck to her guns and got in another lick:

COULTER: I keep going back to the root cause of the problem, which is that we are inviting terrorists to come here and become American citizens … the INS shouldn’t be letting in potential terrorists.

Interestingly, Ann Coulter’s recent column focused on similar arguments:

Avoid the Need for Spying Using One Not-So-Weird Trick,, June 19, 2013

Well, of course the government is spying on Americans! Look at the havoc caused by American citizens engaging in terrorism.

There’s “American citizen” David Coleman Headley, who conspired with Pakistani military officers to commit the 2008 terrorist attacks in Mumbai, India, that left more than 160 people dead.

Headley’s ancestors served under Gen. George Washington — no, I’m sorry, Headley was born “Daood Sayed Gilani” in Washington, D.C., to a Pakistani father. Like your typical American boy, he enjoyed TV’s “Happy Days” and murdering innocent people in terrorist attacks.

There were the 20 “American” men from the Minneapolis area who joined a terrorist group in Somalia in 2008. I knew the Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party would cause trouble one of these days! Continue reading this article

Senator Sessions Lists Broken Promises of Amnesty Bill

Senator Jeff Sessions took the floor Thursday with a simple list of broken pledges from the Gang of Eight, showing the bad faith of the legislation which was negotiated in secret at the behest of business, ethnic and Democrat special interests.

Broken Promises of Senate bill:

● Border security first (not so, amnesty first)

● Toughest enforcement ever (weaker than 2007 bill; no complete entry-exit system)

● Pay back taxes (unenforceable, just a talking point)

● Learn English (taking a class is sufficient)

● No welfare benefits (but earned-income tax credits are included)

● End illegal immigration (CBO says only 25% reduction)

Why Doesn’t Washington Respect Legal Immigrants?

With all the media sob stories about the supposed travails of illegal aliens, it’s refreshing to see a tiny bit of attention focused on legal immigrants. Law-abiding entrants get little respect from Washington elites and campaign consultants, even after the people who came the right way have spent tens of thousands of dollars to pursue immigration.

For example, the formerly Canadian Sweazey family, pictured below, spent $45,000 to become Americans.

So much in the country now seems upside down — but nowhere more so than in the twisted world of immigration politics, where foreign lawbreakers are more privileged than citizens and legal immigrants.

Raw deal: Immigrants who paid a legal price say focus on illegals is ‘discouraging’, Washington Times, June 18, 2013

When Lucinda Sweazey’s family immigrated from Canada in 1999, it took seven years and an estimated $45,000 in legal, passport and visa fees for her parents and siblings to secure permanent resident status in the U.S.

“Our lawyer even mentioned to us when we were going through the process legally that it would have been easier if we came in illegally. We would have saved money, and there’s a good chance we would be citizens by now,” Ms. Sweazey said.

Now an undergraduate student at the King’s College in New York City, the British Columbia native said the massive immigration overhaul working its way through the Senate could make a “mockery of legal immigration.”

If lawmakers offer a shortcut to citizenship for millions of illegal immigrants, she said, “it becomes rather discouraging to someone who came legally.”

Ms. Sweazey and other legal immigrants are voicing concerns that providing amnesty for those who arrived illegally will only encourage more of the same.

“We should not reward people for breaking the rules while we maintain burdensome rules for immigration,” said Liye Zhang, a software engineer in Castro Valley, Calif., who emigrated from China when he was 10.

Mr. Zhang, a strong opponent of amnesty, noted that one of his co-workers plans to obtain a master’s degree in order to get into “a slightly shorter line” for a green card — a process that ultimately will cost more than $300,000 in tuition and loss of salary.

“Giving green cards to illegal immigrants while not giving them to these people seems very much stupid and foolish,” Mr. Zhang said.

Mr. Zhang’s father secured a job in the U.S. in 1999 as a software engineer and obtained visas for his immediate family. Although they pursued citizenship as soon as they could, it took Mr. Zhang seven years to become a citizen.

“The process was long and exhausting,” he said, recalling his visits to immigration offices in San Francisco, many of which required early morning travel and long hours in lines. “It cost a great deal of money even though I am unsure how much precisely it was.” Continue reading this article

MADD AWOL on DUI in Senate Amnesty Bill

How common and unpunished are drunk driving illegal aliens in America? One measure: the uncle of the President is one (pictured), and Omar Onyango is doing just fine, back at his liquor store job and in possession of his driver’s license, after a mere 45 days without it after a drunk-driving bust.

Today’s lawbreaking topic is the failure of Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) to criticize the Senate’s criminal-friendly amnesty bill, specifically on its drunk-driving permissiveness.

I investigated MADD for a 2008 article, Mothers Against Drunk Driving: Successful Reformers—Or Hypocrites from Hell?. After initial success in raising the issue and changing behavior, the organization began to see itself as more educator to wrongdoers than protector of innocents. The attitude has become, “Welcome new drunk drivers! Please sign up for our program.”

Hispanics’ cultural preference for drinking mass quantities of alcohol guarantees a long and profitable future for MADD. (Even NPR has noted, “Latinos are responsible for a disproportionate number of DWI arrests and alcohol-related car accidents.”) A fat pipeline of diverse clients from abroad is advantageous for MADD’s bottom line.

As a result of self-interest, MADD says, “No problema” to the multi-million amnesty.

MADD OK with Illegals with DUIs Staying on America’s Roads,, June 18, 2013

Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) is refusing to fight to prevent the Senate “Gang of Eight” from allowing illegal aliens convicted of drunk driving from being granted legalized status, or amnesty.

When Judicial Watch asked a MADD spokesperson if they would stand up against provisions in the bill that allow illegal aliens convicted of drunk driving to get amnesty, and therefore keep driving on America’s roads, that spokesperson simply responded that MADD “doesn’t get involved in immigration matters.”

Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton told Breitbart News that MADD’s refusal to fight against convicted drunk drivers here is ludicrous. “We know already that Obama is releasing criminal illegal aliens onto the streets,” Fitton said in an email. “This new amnesty will further harm the public safety. In many states, a misdemeanor results in a citizen losing the right to vote. Yet under this amnesty bill, a ‘misdemeanor’ won’t stop an illegal alien from getting legal status and citizenship.”

As Watchdogwire’s Marinka Peschmann detailed in an early June article, there are provisions in the Gang of Eight bill that allow drunk driver illegal aliens to get amnesty.

“On page 608 drunk drivers are welcome too if they have only been busted three times before the Gang of Eight’s bill is enacted,” Peschmann wrote, before citing the specific section of the bill text. Continue reading this article

Thousands of Syrians Will Be Resettled in American Communities

It isn’t enough for Obama and his amnesty cronies in the Gang of Eight to endanger public safety and flood the jobs market with millions of excess workers, the President has also decided to admit thousands of Syrian refugees, potentially putting national security at risk.

The decision is not a complete surprise. A big hint was dropped a week ago that thousands of Syrians would be permitted entrance.

U.S. considers taking in Syrian refugees, Los Angeles Times, June 9, 2013

WASHINGTON — Two years into a civil war that shows no signs of ending, the Obama administration is considering resettling refugees who have fled Syria, part of an international effort that could bring thousands of Syrians to American cities and towns. [. . .]

Homeland security officials require careful vetting of refugees, with multiple interviews and background checks before they are allowed to enter the country. Under normal circumstances, the screening process can take a year or longer. [. . .]

A few years ago, thousands of Iraqi refugees had been admitted on a do-gooder whim, with little investigation. After a couple were found to be jihadist enemies of America (later tried and imprisoned), the 58,000 Iraqi refugees residing in the United States had to be rescreened.

Now the government intends to make the same dangerous mistake again with more Muslims who have no reason to accept western values. Many of the Syrian insurgents are Al Qaeda affiliated. How does this policy not imperil the American people?

Obama allows more Syrian refugees to settle in US, The Hill, June 17, 2013

The Department of Homeland Security on Monday issued new regulations that will allow more Syrian refugees to temporarily settle in the United States.

The department estimates that about 9,000 people will be eligible to come to America under the 18-month extension to March 2015 of the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Syrians. Another 2,600 or so Syrians already here will be able to apply to renew their status. The Obama administration first gave TPS designation to Syrian citizens and residents last year, and the status was set to expire on Sept. 30.

“The extension of the current Syria TPS designation and re-designation is due to the continued disruption of living conditions in the country that are a result of the extraordinary and temporary conditions that led to the initial TPS designation of Syria in 2012,” the Homeland Security Department said. “The extension is based on ongoing armed conflict in that region and the continued deterioration of country conditions.” Continue reading this article

Senate Amnesty Bill Coddles Illegal Alien Criminals

We already know that the Gang of Eight amnesty bill contains a full trough of goodies for foreign job thieves. But evidence is accumulating that favoritism toward dangerous criminal aliens is also written into the legislation, which is not exactly a new trend (see Criminal Protection Is a Historic Element of Congressional Amnesties).

Did La Raza’s cartel division help write S.744? The notion that government’s top job is to protect public safety has been diminished greatly by the open-borders extremists.

Fortunately the criminal-friendly aspect of the bill is beginning to come to light. The legislation allows a great deal of discretion to the DHS Secretary about who may be deported. For example, if a drunk driver’s removal might cause inconvenience to his US-residing familia, he could be permitted to stay, despite the obvious danger to Americans.

The open-border gang has always been squishy on public safety and particularly so on drunk driving illegal aliens, probably because hispanics disproportionately drive drunk (at least according to NPR). It’s just easier for DHS boss Janet Napolitano cover up shocking cases like the Virginia nun Denise Mosier killed by previously arrested illegal Carlos Montano who had been released from jail.

The video above mentioned a couple of preventable deaths, one being that of Phoenix Police Officer Daryl Raetz (shown below with his wife and five-year-old daughter), killed by a hit-and-run driver, an illegal alien with priors.

But to the Gang of Eight and other friends of diverse crime, the preventable deaths of Americans killed by criminal aliens are unimportant, so the plan is to lessen the immigration enforcement that protects public safety.

Debate grows over deporting illegal immigrants with rap sheets after police officers killed, By William La Jeunesse, Fox News, June 17, 2013

As the House and Senate continue to debate overhauling America’s immigration system, new differences are emerging between the two chambers over how to handle criminal illegal immigrants.

The controversy is emerging after two police officers were killed, allegedly by illegal immigrant drunk drivers with prior DUI arrests.

“There are thousands of Americans killed intentionally and accidentally by illegal immigrants who have already been arrested and could have been deported from the U.S.,” said Kris Kobach, an attorney representing Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents who claim the Obama administration is preventing them from deporting law-breakers.

In Houston, police say 23-year-old Andres Munos was driving drunk on May 20 when he struck and killed 47-year-old Sgt. Dwayne Polk, a Harris County sheriff’s deputy. Munos, who is in this country illegally, was previously arrested in 2010 for drunk driving and unlawful carrying of a weapon.

In Phoenix, Jesus Cabrera-Molina admitted he was drunk and high on cocaine the night his SUV struck and killed Phoenix Police Officer Daryl Raetz — but he denies he was behind the wheel. Witnesses disagree, and Phoenix police have charged Molina with manslaughter.

Under a House bill now being debated, drivers like Munos and Molina would likely get deported immediately by ICE or local police, who would have the authority to enforce federal immigration statutes.

Under the Senate bill, however, illegal immigrants accused of non-violent crimes are entitled to a hearing and a taxpayer-funded lawyer. Those with three or fewer misdemeanors and some felonies would be allowed to remain if they had children or wives in the U.S. Continue reading this article

Mexico: Becoming More Middle Class and Pretending Otherwise

Word is getting around that Mexico is becoming more middle class (with 39 percent of Mexicans now so estimated), despite the grifter nation’s attempts to keep that information secret from the United States. Mexican elites would prefer that clueless Washington think of the crackhouse next door as poor relations, needing a continuing handout of free stuff and the nearly open border now being negotiated. The seven million illegal alien Mexicans residing here would benefit from the amnesty and those still in Mexico could look forward to the increased flow included in the “reform” scam.

One example of severe stupid: in 2011, the US gave wealthy Mexico $411 million in foreign aid. Meanwhile, Mexico currently ranks #14 for GDP among nations — it’s rich! Forbes’ March 2013 list of billionaires counted 11 from Mexico.

Even with economic improvements however, Mexican pols are addicted to the cushion of easy-money remittances from their expats ($24 billion in 2012).

I’ve been writing since 2003 that Mexico is a very wealthy country and didn’t need transnational welfare from Uncle Sucker. The country has had a big population living in poverty but also has the financial resources to improve the well being of its citizens by investing in education and infrastructure.

Schools are still sub-par, according to a McClatchy investigation from June 2012. The current report at least shows the movement is in the right direction, albeit slowly.

Of course, it’s tough sledding to improve civil society when a persistent war among drug cartels is shooting up the place. Law and order would be a big help. Business is booming in places like the Yucatan where cartels aren’t littering the resorts with messy beheadings.

One of the recent ruses of the open-borders gang is to demand America admit “narco refugees” of drug violence, when the claimers of victimhood could more easily relocate to somewhere peaceful in Mexico.

Anyway, Mexico seems to be progressing economically in spite of its monumental corruption and backwardness. Good for them!

Many Americans fervently hope for Mexico’s great success, particularly to the extent that they will self-deport, er return to their beloved homeland and remain there happily ever after.

Mexico’s Growing Middle Class is Good News for U.S., ABC News – Univision, June 14, 2013

A new study on Mexico helps to explain the recent fall in Mexican immigration to the U.S. It suggests that Mexico is slowly becoming a “middle class country.”

The study by Mexico’s National Statistics and Geography Institute [INEGI] says that 42 percent of Mexican homes qualify as “middle class” while 39 percent of the country’s overall population falls into this social category. It also points out that at the turn of the century the middle class was only somewhat smaller, as it made up 38 percent of Mexico’s homes and 35 percent of the country’s inhabitants.

So yes, the growth in the Mexican middle class is miniscule compared to what is going on in China, where the middle class grew sixfold over the past ten years. But growth in Mexico’s middle class is still large enough to discourage some illegal immigration to the United States, as a recent Washington Post article suggests. Continue reading this article

San Francisco: Naked Foreign Thug Assaults Several, Not Deported

In San Francisco, the famously kind-to-criminals sanctuary city has released a naked illegal alien who attacked several people in a BART station. Yeiner Perez (pictured), a citizen of Colombia, can be seen on a video knocking down a woman and assaulting others.

But according to sympathetic reporting from the notoriously pro-lawbreaker San Francisco Chronicle, the guy is a just a victim of mental health issues and needs treatment, not deportation.

Perez is apparently back performing acrobat tricks in public, perhaps even wearing pants.

In a country that cared about public safety, an insane violent illegal alien would be repatriated immediately. But if that dangerous alien behaves criminally in San Francisco, he gets free treatment, and the public’s need for reasonable security in a community space is discounted. Perez merely faces “possible” deportation.

The video below (with the naked bits pixed out) shows what a dangerous character was released.

BART’s naked acrobat facing possible deportation, SFGate blog, June 14, 2013

The acrobat and circus performer who accosted several BART passengers while naked at a San Francisco station last month is facing possible deportation, officials said.

Yeiner Perez, 24, was arrested May 10 at the 16th Street Mission station after a incident in which he did handstands, flips and the splits on station turnstiles. He also lunged at and grabbed several passengers, as shown in a video recorded by a station agent.

The San Francisco District Attorney’s office is still weighing whether to charge Perez, but his arrest alerted federal immigration authorities to his presence and set in motion deportation proceedings.

Perez is from Colombia, said Slim Chance, the leader of a Berkeley circus troupe that Perez used to perform with. Immigration officials said he is not a U.S. citizen and is in the country illegally on an expired visa.

After Perez was arrested, he stayed overnight at California Pacific Medical Center on an emergency psychiatric hold, then was passed into BART police custody. He was in jail for 48 hours but was released because BART investigators had not yet put together the paperwork needed for the district attorney to review the case for potential charges, said BART Deputy Police Chief Ben Fairow.

Perez was then taken into custody by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which scans local arrest records for suspected immigration violators. He was released that day with a GPS anklet and required to check in regularly by phone and in person while his deportation case proceeds. Continue reading this article

Senator Rubio's New Argument for Mass Amnesty!

Has anyone else noticed that when Marco Rubio does his amnesty spiel, he begins talking really fast? In a June 13 radio interview with Andrea Tantaros, he stated the legalization of the Senate bill is not amnesty, and he said it lickety split, so listeners couldn’t process the crazy content of what he said.

Tantaros’ fawning over Amnesty Man as the great Republican hope was hard to take, and I won’t be seeking out her radio show. Still, the broadcast got some attention for the Senator’s remarks on a newly discovered benefit of illegal aliens, that they would pay for border security.

Say, what?! Here’s a snip from Byron York’s report:

Rubio: We need to legalize immigrants so they can pay for border security, by Byron York, Washington Examiner, June 13, 2013

[. . .] Rubio’s first reason was that the U.S. has no other choice than to legalize the 11 million. Enhancing security first would take an estimated four years, and Rubio declared, “We cannot wait another four years with 11 million people living in this country illegally without knowing who they are or why they’re here.”

But there was another reason. “We need to register them as soon as possible, not just to keep the problem from getting worse, but we’re going to require them to pay a fine, and that’s the money that we are going to use to pay for the border security,” Rubio explained. “If we don’t get that fine money from the people that have violated our immigration laws, then the American taxpayer is going to have to pay for border security.”

Apparently the Florida Senator thinks some substantial cash will be collected with the “fine” that foreign lawbreakers are supposed to pay. Actually, the bill does not specify exactly what that penalty would be in dollar terms, but it does allow waivers by which the foreigners can avoid any fees. So it looks like the vaunted “fines” are just as imaginary as border security.

Another who noticed the curious claim was Rush Limbaugh, who is still suffering from PRSD (Post Rubio Stress Disorder). On Friday, he was moaning again about his disappointment:

It’s Painful… Rubio Says We Must Legalize Illegals So They Can Pay for Border Security

RUSH: Folks, I can’t tell you, I don’t even want to have to say this.  This is painful.  Did you hear what Senator Rubio said?  We need to bring the illegals here so that they will pay for the border security that we need.  I know.  I can’t tell you, this is painful for me. [. . .]

I’ll tell you why it pains me, why it is really, really painful, this stuff.  Because I really like Senator Rubio.  I remember Senator Rubio campaigning against Crist.  I know who Rubio is. I wish he would get out of this whole immigration fight and not tarnish himself because there is a lot of potential in Marco Rubio.  This immigration thing is gonna taint him.  I just hope it doesn’t.

Limbaugh knows who Rubio is?

The dark side of the force is strong with the young Rubio, who can create delusion in normally sensible conservative pundits. Limbaugh apparently remains a believer in Rubio, despite the evidence from the present and past history of blocking immigration enforcement. Limbaugh is still clinging to the fading hope that Rubio will snap out of an imagined beguilement from the clever tricksters in the Gang of Eight like Schumer and McCain. But it is Limbaugh who has been beguiled by Rubio’s powerful ability to deceive.

NYTimes Hypes Amnesty with Fabricated Sob Story Spin

The big Death-to-America amnesty bill is being debated in the Senate now and we know what that means — it’s Sob Story Season! Yes, it’s time to drag out the most sniffle-inducing yarns about foreigners who created unhappiness for themselves by breaking America’s immigration laws. But in elite newsrooms, the problem is Americans’ mean-spirited insistence on having borders and sovereignty. Let’s all feel bad about having laws!

Here’s Wednesday’s front page of the New York Times, where the main image shows “immigrant” tears trickling down a cruel iron border fence — oh, the horror!

But even the liberal news-hacks admit that the picture is a contrived photo-op (“highly personal political theater” in TimesSpeak) to turn teardrops into forgiveness for lawbreakers. The article’s end interestingly reveals that the Brazilian DREAMer Renata Teodoro is not grateful to American taxpayers for her free education, but is instead “really angry” that she doesn’t have the whole enchilada of a borderless, full-benefit America already. Such is the entitlement mentality peddled by liberals who are unclear on the cost for all the welfare goodies.

Immigrants Reach Beyond a Legal Barrier for a Reunion, New York Times, June 11, 2013

Three young immigrants had a jubilant and painful reunion here on Tuesday with parents who had been deported from the United States, sharing hugs through the steel bars of the border fence that separates this American town from its Mexican twin.

The young adults are part of the movement of immigrants who grew up in this country without legal status who call themselves Dreamers. Their parents traveled to the Mexican side of the fence from Brazil, Colombia and Guadalajara, Mexico, seeing their children in person for the first time in many years.

The meeting, under a searing borderlands sun, was a new piece of the highly personal political theater that young immigrants have used to dramatize their support for a bill in the Senate to overhaul the immigration system. Hours before the encounter here, President Obama spoke at the White House to urge Congress to move quickly to pass the bill. Suggesting the growing influence of the youth movement in the debate, the president framed his remarks — both literally and politically — with Dreamers. Continue reading this article

Ann Coulter: GOP Deserves Extinction if It Pulls the Trigger on America-Destroying Amnesty

Dumb-as-a-rock amnesty huckster Sean Hannity welcomed Ann Coulter on the occasion of her new, cleverly titled column, “If the GOP is this stupid, it deserves to die” (linked below). The stupidity to which she refers is the party suicide Republicans are contemplating by the passage into law of the Gang of Eight amnesty bill, which is a thousand pages of lies and treason against the American people.

Hannity remains a defender of amnesty-pusher Marco Rubio, accepting the Senator’s BS explanation that the “temporary legal status” won’t become citizenship until the little border detail is fixed. Of course, the so-called “temporary” legal status is locked in stone and IS the amnesty because legalization confers the all-important work permit immediately, a fact which Coulter tried in vain to explain to Hannity.

As the bumper sticker says, “You can’t fix stupid!”

If the GOP is this stupid, it deserves to die, By Ann Coulter, Daily Caller, June 12, 2013

Democrats terrify Hispanics into thinking they’ll be lynched if they vote for Republicans, and then turn around and taunt Republicans for not winning a majority of the Hispanic vote.

This line of attack has real resonance with our stupidest Republicans. (Proposed Republican primary targets: Sens. Kelly Ayotte, Jeff Flake, Lindsey Graham and Marco Rubio.) Which explains why Republicans are devoting all their energy to slightly increasing their share of the Hispanic vote while alienating everyone else in America.

It must be fun for liberals to manipulate Republicans into focusing on hopeless causes. Why don’t Democrats waste their time trying to win the votes of gun owners?

As journalist Steve Sailer recently pointed out, the Hispanic vote terrifying Republicans isn’t that big. It actually declined in 2012. The Census Bureau finally released the real voter turnout numbers from the last election, and the Hispanic vote came in at only 8.4 percent of the electorate — not the 10 percent claimed by the pro-amnesty crowd. Continue reading this article

Fine-Print Wizard Strip-Searches Senate Amnesty Bill

While listening to Laura Ingraham yesterday (my new favorite radio show, having shed Limbaugh due to his continuing brain-fogging Rubio infatuation), I heard Betsy McCaughey do some fine analysis of the purposely obfuscating Senate amnesty bill being forced upon us.

She is the former Lt. Governor of New York, who has gotten attention for her consumer-focused book Beating ObamaCare.

Betsy McCaughey has turned her fine analytical skills to the S.744, which is designed to be too complicated for normal citizens to read and understand. Confusion is a very useful tool of the powerful against citizens trying to keep an eye on their government.

I couldn’t find a recording online of Betsy McCaughey on the Ingraham show, but the June 9 video below has some of the same topics. Ginni Thomas at the has been doing some great interviews with interesting people.

McCaughey believes the worst thing about the bill is how it weakens America’s security at a time when we increasingly under attack by terrorists. The legislation actually relaxes the rules for asylum seekers after the deadly Boston Marathon bombing, which was committed by asylees.

GINNI THOMAS: Six big problems with the immigration bill from someone who has actually read it, Daily Caller, June 9, 2013

Former New York lieutenant governor Betsy McCaughey bets “you can’t find five members of Congress who have read” the Senate “Gang of Eight” immigration bill.

The former Democrat is experienced at reading large bills the Congress seems inclined to pass without reading, such as Obamacare. She tabs them, underlines them and tries to see the big picture of what will happen if the provisions of the bill are implemented.

In an interview with The Daily Caller’s Ginni Thomas, McCaughey brought her dog-eared immigration bill with her and pointed to it repeatedly.

“There are many interest groups involved in this bill,” she said.

“In fact, many, many, many — except one. I didn’t find anything for Joe Q. Citizen in this bill. I didn’t find anything for the average tax-paying citizen in this bill.”

“Somebody forgot to tell him about the meeting, so he or she is not represented in this bill,” she added.

McCaughey, author of “Beating Obamacare,” laid out six criticisms and unexamined problems of the bill beyond what she sees as the problematic pathway to citizenship and lax border security provisions of the bill.

According to McCaughey, the bill imperils national security by weakening rules for asylum seekers; outsources government jobs to community organizers, like happened in Obamacare; doubles the numbers of legal immigrants with green cards; contradicts Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio’s ads that promise new citizens will be self-supporting; costs too much; and impedes border agents from doing their basic enforcement job.

Page 104 of 227« First...102030...102103104105106...110120130...Last »