Following a promise from the Presidente to make deportation more “humane”, the administration has decreed that “petty” criminals can benefit from Obama’s executive amnesty.
Who hasn’t seen this coming? More “humanitarian” deportations weren’t going to include better sandwiches for Pancho during his trip home: obviously enforcement standards had to fall lower.
But it’s worse than that: there are no standards. “Petty” crime has no definition at all, so it’s whatever some bureaucrat wants it to be. Is theft no big deal? What about carjacking? Is drunk driving a petty crime?
Is not every immigration bill worse than the last when the Democrats are major authors (and many Repubs are just as bad)? The problem is the Raza open-borders extremists are pulling the legislative strings and they do not act in good faith.
Are you an illegal immigrant whose waiver to stay in the country was denied because of your criminal past? Well, you’re in luck, because the Obama Administration may let you stay in the country anyway.
In a guidance distributed to congressional offices and obtained by The Daily Caller, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services announced that it is reopening cases in which applications for provisional unlawful presence waivers were denied to criminals.
According to the notice, USCIS had determined that applicants should not be denied an I-601A waiver due to a past criminal offense so long as it “falls under the petty offense or youthful offender exceptions or is not considered a crime involving moral turpitude.”Last week, USCIS began reopening waiver applications denied due ‘solely’ to a prior criminal offense before January 24, 2014, “in order to determine whether there is reason to believe the prior criminal offense might render the applicant inadmissible.”
The notice does not specify what types of crimes constitute a “petty offense,” and defines neither “youthful offender” nor “a crime involving moral turpitude.” Neither DHS nor USCIS responded to TheDC’s requests for comment. Continue reading this article
It’s spring in the northern hemisphere, so in many backward areas, young men are gathering en masse to head for first-world nations that offer generous welfare programs and jobs for the unskilled.
In passive Europe, a Camp of the Saints scenario is shaping up as the culturally weak societies there have been convinced by socialists that Europe is guilty of success and must therefore accept millions of the world’s unhappy poor as social justice payback.
A week ago, around 500 Africans breached the Melilla entrance to Spain (located on the coast of Morocco), a record number thus far. They were from Mali and Senegal, both of which are around 90 percent Muslim. Interestingly, the El Pais report following has an amazing rough video of hundreds of Africans running toward the border, beyond my embedding expertise unfortunately. Because of the oddball outposts of Europe on the African continent (i.e. Melilla and Ceuta), invasive young men can jog to the first world rather than hazard a leaky boat.
Around 500 sub-Saharan immigrants succeeded in jumping the border fence separating the Spanish exclave of Melilla from Moroccan territory early Tuesday morning.
The massive run on the fence took place around 8am near Nano river, several sources confirmed. This is the largest jump to date.
A high-ranking official at the Spanish Interior Ministry called the event “very worrisome” and said it underscored “the severe migratory pressure on both autonomous cities,” a reference to Ceuta and Melilla, Spain’s two exclaves in North Africa.
The undocumented migrants, who say they come from Mali and Senegal, immediately headed for the local temporary immigrant holding center (CETI) amid jubilant cries of “Bosa, bosa,” which witnesses said means “victory.” [. . .]
As a result of weakened resolve of Europeans plus the upheavals in the Middle East, the influx of demanding foreigners to the continent has reached a record level. What a surprise.
Nearly half a million people sought asylum in Europe last year, the most in two decades, with the largest number coming from Syrians fleeing civil war, the European Union said on Monday.
In total, 434,160 people sought refuge in the EU’s 28 member states in 2013, according to Eurostat, the EU statistics office. That was an increase of nearly 30 percent from the 335,000 requests in 2012.
The European Union rejected 65 percent of the requests and granted refugee status to 15 percent of the asylum seekers. The remaining 20 percent got at least temporary permission to stay in Europe. Rejected applicants had a right to appeal.
Some 50,000 applicants from Syria accounted for the largest number, nearly 12 percent of the total. More than 140,000 people have been killed in the three-year-old conflict, which has grown increasingly sectarian as regional powers back either President Bashar al-Assad, a member of the Shi’ite offshoot Alawite sect, or the mostly Sunni rebels. Continue reading this article
The more diverse the refugees, the more help they require from well paid refugee settlement experts. If newbies could just move in and get going, then there would be no need for a taxpayer-funded Refugee Industrial Complex to instruct primitive tribal people how to use electric lights, stoves and a host of other gizmos common to normal modern life. (See an earlier attempt in quickie cultural integration: “Cliff Notes Assimilation for Somalis.”)
The situation described here focuses on Nepalis in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, population 153,888 as of 2010 census. The city has unfortunately been designated as a dump zone by the government, with 51 languages spoken in city schools.
These days, the refugee/asylum conduit is just another way to funnel big-government immigrants into the US.
Today’s sermon in do-goodery is instruction in the operation of a normal first-world apartment. The article notes in a later paragraph that faucets and stoves have been broken by refugees who don’t know how to use them. Your tax dollars at work, presumably, since the churches involved get paid for their services, apparently Lutherans in this case.
SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (AP) — The problems refugees face after relocating in Sioux Falls are relatively mundane compared to what they faced at home.
But an unfamiliarity with household appliances and cleaners, for example, is a real hurdle. A new housing orientation program by one of the city’s largest property management companies is explaining these everyday necessities.
More refugees are coming to Sioux Falls every year, and with them come different cultures.
“We’ve got to embrace it,” said Tannen Loge, vice president of property management for Lloyd Cos., which has more than 3,000 apartments in Sioux Falls. “It’s very important that we provide housing for individuals that feels like their home.”
The company launched an educational program this year that teaches all about how to live in an apartment. The program springboards from a similar class the city’s Multi-Cultural Center put together about a year and a half ago.
Dhan Gagamer was one of about 20 participants in the first program in January, held in an empty unit of an apartment complex, where 80 percent of residents are immigrants. Gagamer lives with her husband and their two young daughters at that complex on the city’s east side. They left Nepal in 2010 and settled in Sioux Falls with help from Lutheran Social Services.
In Nepal, the family lived in a house. Unlike Gagamer’s childhood home in a Bhutanese village, it had electric lights, but the family cooked over a fire. They didn’t recognize the electric stove they encountered in Sioux Falls.
Christy Nicolaisen, executive director of the Multi-Cultural Center, said a good chunk of time in January was spent explaining the electric stove. Three African refugees attended the first class, and none of them had used an electric stove or a dishwasher in their three to five years in the United States.
“Some things will sink in immediately. Some things are so new and different,” Nicolaisen said. “Our ultimate goal is that they’re happy in the places they live in.”
The class also covered food storage, which type of soap to use in the dishwasher and which cleaning chemicals they shouldn’t mix. They also covered the importance of not letting their children play in the parking lots or pull fire alarms.
A week ago, I reported on the Speaker of the House inviting the pope to speak before Congress, something that has never happened before and would be quite a blow to the separation of church and state. Pope Francis has not yet accepted as of this writing, but it’s hard to imagine he wouldn’t, given the opportunity to spread the Vatican message. Still, there’s no date mentioned, so it’s all rather vague. Maybe Boehner just wanted to see some nice news about himself in the press.
Right on cue, some anchor aliens and supporters announced a junket to the Vatican to plead their case: “Don’t let meanie Americans deport my dad!”
Wait, aren’t they supposed to be suffering in the shadows? How do they afford a trip to Europe? Picking strawberries must be better paying than we are led to think. Maybe some amnesty billionaire is picking up the tab. Or La Raza.
ANAHEIM – The way 10-year-old Jersey Vargas sees it, the pope is the closest person to God.
“I believe he can make a wish for us,” said the petite fourth-grader, the daughter of undocumented immigrants who will be traveling to Rome on Friday to personally deliver a message to Pope Francis from her and other children whose parents face deportation. [. . .]
More than a dozen activists and at least two children whose parents live in the United States without legal documentation will travel to the Vatican to deliver more than 1,000 letters from children whose families live in fear of deportation. They will ask the pope for his blessings “so we can continue with this epic battle,” said Juan José Gutierrez, coordinator of The Full Rights for Immigrants Coalition. And they will also ask the pope to bring up the issue with Obama when the two meet the next day, Gutierrez said.
“It’s very nice for President Barack Obama to tell us quite often that he supports immigration reform. But we believe we’ve gotten to the point where we need more than moral support,” said Gutierrez, whose group is also working to get a private audience with the pope. [. . .]
As it happens, the well traveled President Obama has a pope meeting scheduled during his European visit next week. Naturally, they are expected to chat about making life easier for illegal alien job thieves, because nobody important cares about the 20 million jobless Americans.
As the top Vaticrat, the pope would like to promote a more Catholic America, and importing low-information newbies from Latin America must seem like a winning strategy. Years of pedophile priest scandals have diminished church attendance among the disgusted faithful in this country. One in ten Americans is an ex-Catholic, and one-third of Americans raised Catholic no longer identify as such. Obviously replacements of any legality look desirable to Vatican elites concerned primarily with maintaining the institution.
Meetings between popes and presidents have often been seen as photo opportunities, but people who have advised President Obama on faith issues say his get-together next week with Pope Francis will involve other high-level officials and likely concrete talks about how to boost the Israeli-Palestinian peace process and ease extreme poverty.
It’s possible, the advisers say, that the U.S. embargo on Cuba and the condition of immigrants in the United States could also arise in the conversation between Obama and the church’s first Latin American pope.
The White House announced in January that Obama would meet Francis during a European trip. Both the President and Michelle Obama will be there, as well as National Security Advisor Susan Rice and possibly Secretary of State John F. Kerry.
While there’s a clear appeal to being seen with the planet’s most popular pastor, experts say the trip isn’t without risks for the president. Francis is likely to raise concerns about war and poverty, areas where the Argentine Jesuit appears to favor more left-leaning solutions than does the current administration. Continue reading this article
I heard a radio version of this story on Friday. The idea is to take a bunch of Mexican immigrants and teach them computer coding to liberate them from the tomato fields and get swell jobs in tech. They are getting a bachelor’s degree in computer science in three years, even though many start not knowing calculus and some require remedial English. What could possibly go wrong?
None of the hispanics in this project seem interested in programming computers to do neat things; they just want the money.
Check out the Mexican mom in the video who thinks she can get a job at Google. “Being Latina, a woman and bilingual, I have the opportunity to help them, be able to create programs and solve problems for that culture,” she chatters in Spanish. She can barely speak English, and her school-age child doesn’t do much better. Is this embarrassing example the best KQED can present for its diversity fairy tale?
Another point of interest: Hartnell College (a two-year community college), which is handling the coding project, was put on probation for accreditation issues in 2013 by the Western Association of Schools and Colleges for the second time in six years. How does it offer a four-year degree in three years, even in partnership with a California State University?
And anyway, why the rushed approach to education? It would make sense for students who start out needing remedial work to take more time rather than less. Do the Mexicans not have the patience to complete a normal four-year college education? The liberal brains behind this scheme may think a hurried schedule of courses will prevent dropouts — good luck with that.
The whole thing seems like a scam. There will be no follow-up coverage in three years showing successfully employed graduates because there won’t be any. Either the students will drop out when the course work gets harder or they will graduate with inadequate skills to survive the IT marketplace.
Rogelio Mendoza mows the front lawn outside his family’s modest home in Salinas. It’s a warm weekday evening, and his wife, Norma, is cooking dinner for their three boys.
“Carne, beans and some posole … that’s what’s we’re having today,” says Norma as she serves her oldest son, Alonso, who just came home from a long day of classes at Hartnell Community College in Salinas.
The-21-year-old is the first in the family to attend college.
Alonso says some days he feels like “his head is going to explode” with so much new information. But he admits that schoolwork is much better than farmwork.
“Having your back hurt, and your arms hurt … you can’t compare that kind of tired to having your mind stress over homework,” Alonso says.
The Mendoza family is a farmworker family.
Alonso’s father, Rogelio, has been planting and harvesting in the fields for more than 30 years. Alonso joins his dad during the summers spending long hours picking lettuce and strawberries.
“You get home … and you don’t even want to talk to nobody,” Alonso recalls. “I would fall asleep on the floor … then wake up and it’s already time to go back to work.”
Experiencing that kind of manual labor motivated Alonso to graduate from high school.
He says teenagers who drop out of school tend to work in three places: the mall, a fast-food restaurant or the fields.
“(Young people) don’t see themselves doing something big in life,” he says. “They get paid $10 an hour and they settle for that.”
But Alonso refuses to settle.
About a year ago, he was registering for his classes at Hartnell College when he learned about the Computer Science and Information Technology-In-3 Program, an accelerated degree program specifically for students of farmworker families.
In partnership with California State University, Monterey Bay, Hartnell is promising a bachelor’s degree in computer science in just three years. Continue reading this article
Look out, Dearbornistan and other US victims of Muslim immigration. France’s Islo-violence may well be a preview of coming attractions. America should pay attention and learn from Europe’s misery, but elites would rather cling to their liberal notion that any diversity is strength, even the murderous, misogynous type.
The latest outbreak occurred in Yvelines, a suburb of Paris. Some Muslim boys felt miffed after interacting with local gendarmes, and a riot broke out. So sensitive, these aspiring headchoppers!
Gates of Vienna blog helpfully provided a transcript:
02:22 And after Forbach last week it’s the police of (?) in the Yvelines
02:26 who were the target of the city’s delinquents. The scenario is sadly banal
02:30 Sunday afternoon, having picked up an individual on the wanted list
02:34 a police patrol had tried to arrest him
02:38 This attempt immediately attracted a mob of about 60 people
02:42 who violently attacked the police. Teargas
02:46 used by the police did not stop the aggressors who then attacked an
02:50 employment agency, breaking its windows and setting fire to it.
02:55 They also targetted the police station
02:59 one car completely destroyed by the flames
03:03 their anger apparently increased by the fact that during the clashes the police
03:07 had targetted young Muslims coming out of the mosque.
03:11 While calm had been restored towards 1 am, 15 riot police cars
03:15 were still stationed around “Employ & Enterprise” while Riot- and Mobile Police
03:19 guarded public buildings and intersections.
03:23 The message addressed to the authorities is clear:
03:27 ”The city is ours, we do as we please, and if you don’t agree we burn it”.
Another day, another enunciation from the White House that illegal aliens will be shielded from deportation unless they are axe murderers. It’s getting hard to keep up with the list.
The latest is a twofer — Obamacare is touted among the diverse and the aliens get to feel more comfy in sovereignty-free America. The President appeared on a Univision sports program (because he has nothing more pressing to do) and assured families including unlawful foreigners that nobody would be deported as a result.
Wait, don’t illegals know deportations are way down under Obama? Spanish radio is probably squawking the usual lies about loving daddies being yanked away from adorable doe-eyed kiddies by jack-booted federal agents.
President Obama on Tuesday sought to assure legal immigrants that they can sign up for ObamaCare without worrying that “the immigration people” will come for family members who are in the country illegally.
In an interview with Univision Deportes, a Spanish-language sports radio show, Obama said immigration officials won’t have access to the personal information that consumers provide when signing up for healthcare on the new exchanges.
“Well, the main thing for people to know is that any information you get, you know, asked with respect to buying insurance, does not have anything to do with … the rules governing immigration,” Obama said. “And you know, you can qualify if you’re a legal resident, if you are … legally present in the United States.
“You know, if you have a family where some people are citizens or legally here, and others are not documented, the immigration people will never get that information.”
Adolf Falcon, the senior vice president of the National Alliance for Hispanic Health, told The Hill that Hispanic families are wary of Obama’s assurances because of his record on deportations. Continue reading this article
Here’s a fascinating video from the informative IslamVersusEurope blog showing concerned Germans rejecting the government’s sudden announcement that a number of asylum seekers would be jammed into their apartment building. The video includes a tour showing small rooms filled with beds like a barracks, with 12 refugees using one bathroom. The guide announces, “This year we have to accept 200 more refugees in the Upper Bavaria region.” Such cramped quarters could easily lead to angry young men, since refugees are often more demanding than grateful.
The German residents have many concerns, such as how the newbies can take part in shared responsibilities when they don’t speak the language. In a gathering with residents, a government bureaucrat (mayor?) opens by stating, “I welcome you to our information meeting about asylum seekers in need and the right to a place.”
What about the citizens’ rights?
The meeting ended in anger, as a young German man stepped onto the stage to confront the bureaucrat that residents were not consulted at all. A middle-aged man was concerned about the safety of women and girls, “and my wife completely alone.”
The video news report does not specify the origin of the asylum seekers. Are they from Africa? Syria? They must be an undesirable diversity for reporters to keep their identity secret.
No Pope has ever spoken to the Congress before, but the Speaker thinks that it’s fine to offer him a uniquely high honor (and violate the separation of church and state) even though the nation is still majority Protestant (52 percent, more than double the number of Catholics).
Seriously, who thinks any official from the Catholic church can claim moral authority?
The new Pope has been on the job for a year and has gotten praise for his kindness and rejection of the church’s lavish riches. Many in the press loved his first foreign trip, a visit to Lampedusa the southerly island outpost of Italy, where he welcomed Africans fleeing their homelands in search of a European lifestyle.
Allowing the Pope to address Congress is another instance of history being disregarded, specifically the fact that many of America’s early settlers came to escape the tyranny of the Vatican. One example is the Protestant Salzburgers who came to Georgia after thousands were expelled from the homes in Germany by the Catholic archbishop. In addition, the better known Puritans came to escape the Church of England, which they thought retained too many elements of Catholicism.
WASHINGTON — House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, extended a formal and open invitation Thursday to Pope Francis to address a joint meeting of Congress.
If the pontiff accepts, it would be unprecedented. No pope or religious leader that serves as a head of state has ever addressed Congress, according to the U.S. House Historian’s office.
“His address as a visiting head of state before a joint meeting of the House and Senate would honor our nation in keeping with the best traditions of our democratic institutions,” Boehner said in a statement. ” It would also offer an excellent opportunity for the American people as well as the nations of the world to hear his message in full.”
Boehner, who is Catholic, said Pope Francis has inspired millions of Americans with his “pastoral manner and servant leadership” to reflect on matters of human dignity, freedom and social justice.
“These principles are among the fundamentals of the American idea,” Boehner said, “and though our nation sometimes fails to live up to these principles, at our best, we give them new life as we seek the common good.” Continue reading this article
House Judiciary Chairman Robert W. Goodlatte, R-Va., is scheduled to hold a high-dollar fundraiser in Silicon Valley next week — but frustrated tech donors are already grumbling about the event, disappointed by the lack of progress from House Republicans on one of their top policy priorities: immigration legislation.
According to an invitation obtained by CQ Roll Call, the Goodlatte fundraiser is organized by TechNet, which bills itself as the “preeminent bipartisan political network of CEOs and Seniors Executives that promotes the growth of technology-led innovation.” Suggested contribution levels for Wednesday’s round table and reception with the powerful chairman range between $10,000 and $40,000 for the Goodlatte Victory Committee.
Not every big-time tech donor, however, is ready to cut a check, because Goodlatte’s Judiciary Committee has jurisdiction over immigration legislation.
“In this case, because there’s been mixed messages from the Republicans, before I write my check, I wanted some assurances that Bob Goodlatte would be prepared to discuss immigration reform and what the timetable is for immigration reform, because we’re coming down the wire here with the [midterm] elections [approaching] and we need accountability,” said Ron Conway, a top angel investor and venture capitalist, adding that he had contacted TechNet via email with his concerns.
As CQ Roll Call reported last week, Republicans are risking political retribution from their most prominent donors if they do not pursue immigration legislation — and soon.
According to Political MoneyLine, Conway and his wife have already donated more than $140,000 this cycle to Republican and Democratic candidates. That’s enough to earn them a spot just within the top 100 individual contributors, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
“I’m waiting to hear back from TechNet, that they can assure us that Bob Goodlatte can give us a tangible schedule … then it’s worth it for us to cut the big checks,” Conway said. “Bob Goodlatte is a huge gatekeeper in this regard, and we need his help.” Continue reading this article
The press is full of stories about open-borders pests demanding more “humane deportations” (code for saying they want NO repatriations). The President appears amenable to going further. He used the occasion of an early St Patrick’s Day event to remark, “There’s no reason why we can’t do for this generation of immigrants what was done for a previous generation, to give them that chance.”
Of course, Irish immigrants (most of them at least historically) have come to America lawfully, but the President acts like illegal aliens’ lawbreaking entrance is the same as how many citizens’ ancestors came to this country.
Such an attitude of lawlessness at the top of our government presents a danger to all Americans from terrorists and criminals. Of course rewarding lawbreaking foreigners with work permits and protecting them from deportation is an insult to all legal immigrants who have spent thousands of dollars and dealt with lawyers to do it the right way.
WASHINGTON—U.S. Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), a senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, issued the following statement today after the President requested a review of the Administration’s immigration enforcement policies for the purpose of further relaxing enforcement standards:
“It is astonishing that the President would order an ‘enforcement review’ not for the purposes of repairing enforcement but weakening it further. According to ICE’s own published statistics, the vast majority of those removed from the country have been convicted of a crime or involved with a serious crime. Illegal immigrants in the U.S. who don’t meet the Administration’s ‘priorities’—even if they come into contact with immigration enforcement—are widely exempt from federal immigration law. And approximately two-thirds of removals last year were in fact not deportations at all but were instead of apprehensions of those interdicted crossing the border. This lawlessness is a large factor in the decline of wages for Americans, immigrant and native-born, alike. President Obama should demonstrate more concern for struggling American workers of all backgrounds. Indeed, in addition to decimating current immigration law, he is pushing to double the number of foreign guest workers who companies bring in to take jobs.
This latest action further demonstrates that the Administration cannot be trusted to enforce any immigration plan from Congress. Congressional Democrats, who have helped empower this state of illegality, must be held to account for their actions.” Continue reading this article
[. . .] MR. GATES: Well, technology in general will make capital more attractive than labor over time. Software substitution, you know, whether it’s for drivers or waiters or nurses or even, you know, whatever it is you do – (laughter).
MR. BROOKS: We wonder that too sometimes. (Laughter.)
MR. GATES: It’s progressing. And that’s going to force us to rethink how these tax structures work in order to maximize employment, you know, given that, you know, capitalism in general, over time, will create more inequality and technology, over time, will reduce demand for jobs particularly at the lower end of the skill set.
And so, you know, we have to adjust, and these things are coming fast. Twenty years from now, labor demand for lots of skill sets will be substantially lower, and I don’t think people have that in their mental model.
MR. BROOKS: So aligning the incentives in our economy to move away from taxing labor, moving to something like a progressive consumption tax is just a smart thing to do to stimulate – to have an economy that’s better aligned?
MR. GATES: Well, I think economists would have said that a progressive consumption tax is a better construct, you know, at any point in history. What I’m saying is that it’s even more important as we go forward because it – the distortion – I want to distort in the favor of labor. And so not only will we not tax labor, things like the earned income tax credit, you know, when people say we should raise the minimum wage, I think, boy, you know, I know some economists disagree. But I think, boy, I worry about what that does to job creation.
The interviewer at AEI was too polite to note that a few year back, billionaire Gates was appearing before Congress pleading that the government admit a monster stream of (cheap) foreign workers.
Below, billionaire Bill Gates visits India, the home of many of Microsoft employees.
WASHINGTON–For the second year in a row, Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates ventured to Capitol Hill and urged Congress to let more foreign-born engineers work in the United States and to direct larger numbers of tax dollars to research and education.
Just as he did around the same time last year before a U.S. Senate committee, Gates on Wednesday contended America’s competitiveness in the global economy is “at risk.” He said Congress, the administration, and the next president must commit to overhauling immigration policy and encouraging both public and private research investment.
“It makes no sense to educate people in our universities, often subsidized by U.S. taxpayers, and then insist they return home,” he told the House of Representatives Science and Technology Committee during a two-hour hearing. [. . .]
Fair Use: This site contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues related to culture and mass immigration. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, see: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000107----000-.html. In order to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.