Fifty-eight Percent Favor Waterboarding of Plane Terrorist To Get Information [12/31/09]
A Rasmussen Poll shows that a majority of Americans believe we are at war and terrorists shouldn't get lawyered up or be given all the rights of citizens. Instead, the bad guys should be induced to reveal relevant information -- using more intense means than gentle persuasion if necessary.
Fifty-eight percent (58%) of U.S. voters say waterboarding and other aggressive interrogation techniques should be used to gain information from the terrorist who attempted to bomb an airliner on Christmas Day.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 30% oppose the use of such techniques, and another 12% are not sure.
Men and younger voters are more strongly supportive of the aggressive interrogation techniques than women and those who are older. Republicans and voters not affiliated with either major party favor their use more than Democrats.
Seventy-one percent (71%) of all voters think the attempt by the Nigerian Muslim to blow up the airliner as it landed in Detroit should be investigated by military authorities as a terrorist act. Only 22% say it should be handled by civilian authorities as a criminal act, as is currently the case.
Polling shows Americans becoming more at odds with the President's "subtler course" to national security.
Support for closing the Guantanamo facility has been dropping since the president announced it just after taking office, and most voters are now opposed. In August, 75% were at least somewhat concerned that dangerous terrorists would be set free if the Guantanamo prison camp is closed and some prisoners are transferred to other countries.
Fifty-one percent (51%) of voters oppose the Obama administrationÕs decision to try the confessed chief planner of the 9/11 attacks and other suspected terrorists in a civilian court in New York City rather than before a military tribunal at Guantanamo. Twenty-nine percent (29%) think the civilian trials are a good idea.
Most voters also said the massacre at Fort Hood, Texas by a Muslim Army officer should be investigated by military authorities as a terrorist act rather than by civilian authorities as a criminal act.
Sixty-three percent (63%) say political correctness prevented the military from responding to warning signs from Major Nidal Malik Hasan that could have prevented the Fort Hood shootings from taking place.
When it comes to protecting the country and its people, citizens want a robust approach and strong leadership. Obama's touchy-feeling strategy has been a complete disaster and is read as weakness by our enemies.
In July 1979, just months after she became Britain's first female Prime Minister, Thatcher responded angrily when Foreign Secretary Lord Carrington suggested that Britain accept 10,000 Vietnamese boat people over two years.
An angry Thatcher said there were already too many Asians arriving and that 'with some exceptions, there had been no humanitarian case for accepting 1.5 million from South Asia and elsewhere. It was essential to draw a line somewhere.'
The secret minutes of the meeting added: 'She thought it wrong immigrants should be given council housing whereas white citizens were not.'
Told that many people were writing to urge ministers to accept more refugees, Thatcher responded tetchily: 'All those who wrote letters should be invited to accept one into their homes.'
Why would it be "tetchy" of PM Thatcher to suggest that do-gooders who want more refugees take some responsibility for their care?
On the eve of the 2010 Census, as the Census Bureau prepares to conduct an actual count of the nationÕs population, the bureau projects that on Jan. 1, 2010 Ñ three months out from Census Day Ñ the total U.S. population will be 308,400,408. This would represent an increase of 2,606,181, or 0.9 percent, from New YearÕs Day 2009.
In January 2010, one birth is expected to occur every eight seconds in the United States and one death every 12 seconds.
Meanwhile, net international migration is expected to add one person every 37 seconds to the U.S. population in January 2010, resulting in an increase in the total U.S. population of one person every 14 seconds.
At a growth rate of .9 per year, the doubling time of the US population is around 78 years, so if that rate of growth continues, in the year 2088 America's population will be 616 million.
White House prepares for immigration overhaul battle
[12/30/09]
Obie has been breaking campaign promises right and left, so his pledge to amnesty tens of millions of foreign lawbreakers may fall by the wayside along with increased transparency and a crackdown on earmarks. However, I wouldn't count on it because the President's dedication to the far left runs deep.
In a recent conference call with proponents, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina, political director Patrick Gaspard and others delivered the message that the White House was committed to seeing a substantial immigration bill pass and wanted to make sure allies were prepared for the fight.
In addition to the citizenship provision, the emerging plan will emphasize efforts to secure U.S. borders against those trying to cross illegally. But that two-track approach was rejected repeatedly in the past by Republicans and other critics who insist that a border crackdown must demonstrate its effectiveness before any action on citizenship is considered.
Whatever proposal Obama puts forward will probably meet equally determined opposition. Another complication is the calendar: Midterm elections are in November, and polls show that the public is more worried about joblessness and the fragile economy than anything else.
Plane Attack Spooks Public Confidence in War on Terror
[12/30/09]
The American people are losing faith in the kumbaya President's leadership and determination to keep the country safe. Bowing and scraping to dictators doesn't work, nor does naive "outreach" to murderous Muslims.
Every day brings worse news about system failure (e.g. U.S. Knew of Airline Terror Plot Before Christmas), so survey figures are apt to get worse, from the President's viewpoint.
From the Rasmussen pollsters...
Belief that the bad guys are winning the War on Terror is now at its highest level in over two years, and nearly half of U.S. voters say America is not safer than it was before 9/11.
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 30% of voters think the terrorists are winning the War on Terror. That's the first time the number holding that pessimistic view has reached 30% since October 2007.
Just 18% believed the terrorists were winning the week President Obama took office in January. At that time, 55% said America and its allies were on top. Now, just 36% say the United States and its allies are winning the War on Terror. Only once since July 2007 have voters had less confidence.
Just 27% now say that the United States is safer today than it was before the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. However, 47% say it is not, That latter figure marks a nine-point jump from earlier in the month and is the highest negative finding on the question since Rasmussen Reports began surveying on it in 2002. We have been tracking the question monthly since November 2006 and also measured it regularly in 2004 and 2005. Before that, it was asked on an occasional basis.
A handful of assaults in Kennedy Park promptedÊpolice to reevaluate their relationship with members of the inner city community.
Somali teenagers were identified as the attackers taking advantage of crimes of opportunity against people who were walking alone or were intoxicated, according to police.
Police and members of the Somali community say those attackers represent a very small group within the whole.Ê
Officers in the schools work to identify gang development early on and members of the Somali Bantu Youth Association of Maine spend time teaching young immigrants about non-violence.
Maybe the officers explained to the Somali gangster "community" that brutal assaults perpetrated on citizens can lead to hard time in state prison rather than the diversity fairy tale being spun here. (Note how every sentence in the excerpt above either blames the victims or diminishes the violent nature of the crimes.)
The Trouser Bomber Effect: Watching Government Cure Incompetence with Idiocy
[12/29/09]
Why is no one in the media raking Hilary Clinton over the coals for her State Department's abysmal performance in the underpants bomber case? Forget the noise about TSA and the current wailing about airport security; the guy never should have gotten out of the US embassy with a visa after the father's warning that sonny had gone jihad.
It is really simple, the American Embassy in Lagos, Nigeria screwed up bigtime. Even a minor consular officer like a grade 6 Foreign Service Officer can understand that, even if no one in the press or the Obama Administration seems to. Unfortunately it appears no minor consular officer ever got their hands on this in Lagos. This screw up was handled by the big guys at the Embassy.
Once a credible person of the stature of Abdulmutullab's father, multimillionaire Umaru Mutullab, one of the most important figures in banking in all of Africa, contacted the Embassy and said he feared his son had been "radicalized," the Embassy should have immediately reviewed the young man's American multiple entry visa granted to him by the American Embassy in London in 2008 and placed a hold on it pending a hearing. But that's not what happened. According to the Department of State, Umaru had a face to face meeting at the request of high officials in Nigerian Security with top American embassy officials on November 19th. And the records at State show what did happen.
The Department of State did a cursory derogatory information sweep on Abdulmutullab on November 20th and found nothing. Then on November 23rd The Department of State referred the matter to the Department of Justice which concluded with his being added to the TIDE database. There is no evidence that any attempt was made to contact British authorities where the young man had lived in a 4 million pound flat while on a student visa to the UK. His American visa had been issued in London. If they had, they might have learned the British had already pulled Abdulmutullab's visa last May.
Apparently no one ever considered the easiest, simplest step to review the multiple entry visa and associated travel records to see if something had changed that might lend credence to the father's concern.
The visa is not an automatic right for a foreign citizen. An American entry visa is a privilege granted under certain circumstances. Requiring a hearing to consider the new information doesn't require making a final judgment. Maybe this charge was just an outgrowth of some family feud. It simply ensures that new information is analyzed before access is continued. If rumors of Abdulmutullab's trips to Yemen and other terrorist hot spots are true, the evidence for them might have surfaced during the visa review.
QUESTION: You know, Ian, there are so many different questions about these Ð this attempted bombing thing, but I think there's one big one that stands out, which is after everything Ð you know, he goes to the Embassy, tells all this stuff about his son, he's put on the watch list. Why wasn't his visa pulled? What is the explanation?
MR. KELLY: Okay. Well, first of all, let's Ð let me just say at the top that this has become an interagency effort, this whole effort of trying to protect our borders and keep our citizens safe. The State Department role in this Ð of course, the most prominent part of it is the visa issuance part of it. And this individual came in to the U.S. Embassy in London Ð I mean, he was studying in London Ð and applied for a visa and was issued a visa that was good for two years. It was a standard multiple-entry tourist visa.
Update: See also Col. Peters 12/29 op-ed on the same subject, Lying to ourselves.
We proclaim that the terrorists "don't represent Islam." OK, whom do they represent? The Franciscans? We don't get to decide what's Islam and what isn't. Muslims do. And far too many of them approve of violent jihad.
It gets worse. Instead of focusing on the religious zeal and inspiration of our enemies and how such motivations change the game, our "terrorism experts" agonize over whether such beasts as Abdulmutallab or Maj. Hasan, the Fort Hood assassin for Allah, are really members of al Qaeda or not.
U.S. Failed to Catch Suspect's Active Visa
[12/28/09]
Rather than torturing airline passengers still more with additional searches and demeaning inconveniences, national security should begin much further upstream. In particular, the State Department should be held much more accountable for distributing visas to dangerous people.
And more common sense (dismissed as "profiling" in our politically correct time) would be in order, namely extra scrutiny paid to young Muslim men.
CBS News has learned the State Department system designed to keep track of active U.S. visas twice failed to reveal Nigerian terror suspect Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab had been issued an active visa allowing him multiple entries into the United States.
According to a law enforcement source, the first failure came on Nov. 19, 2009, the very same day Abdulmutallab father's, Dr. Umaru Mutallab, a prominent banking official in Nigeria, expressed deep concern to officials at the U.S. Embassy in Abjua, Nigeria, that his 23-year-old son had fallen under the influence of "religious extremists" in Yemen.
The second failure to flag an active visa belonging to Abdulmuttalab occurred the very next day in Washington, after Mutallab's concerns were forwarded to officials there. It was only after the Christmas Day terror attack in Detroit that U.S. officials learned that Abdulmuttalab had been issued a visa by the U.S. Embassy in London valid from June 16, 2008, through June 12, 2010.
Domestic Terror Incidents Hit a Peak in 2009
[12/28/09]
The last few days of December are traditionally filled with year-end top ten lists of important stories or best new books, etc. One important tally is the the number of attempted terror attacks in year #1 in the reign of Obama.
Weren't his efforts in reaching out to Muslims (e.g. his widely celebrated Cairo speech) supposed to quell the 1400-year war of Islam against the West? How about the physical bowing to the Saudi king? That gesture was supposed to demonstrate that America was no longer an oppressor to the Third Worldd, but was another indicator of weakness to the big turban guys.
The liberal theory that friendly persuasion can dissuade violent jihadists from the killer path hasn't worked out very well as recent events indicate.
You may not have noticed because most of the plots were foiled, but 2009 saw an unprecedented surge in terror "events" on U.S. soil. When analysts tally these events, they refer to anything from a disrupted plot to U.S. citizens traveling abroad to seek terror training or a lone gunman running amok in the U.S. And by the calculations of Rand Corporation expert Brian Jenkins, more terrorist threats were uncovered in the U.S. during 2009 than in any year since 2001.
"There appears to be an increase in [terrorist] activity in the U.S.," warns Jenkins, who calculates that there have been 32 terror-related "events" on these shores since 9/11, and that 12 of those occurred in 2009.
In fact, the election of Obama may well have encouraged jihadists who believe that an Islam-friendly president occupies the White House.
First case of highly drug-resistant TB found in US
[12/27/09]
Public health is one of the many areas of modern life threatened because of permissive immigration policies. There have been warnings of extremely drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR TB) appearing in places like Russia, so it was only a matter of time until the disease reached America courtesy of our foreign visitors. Patient #1 of the new plague is a young Peruvian who came to "learn English" (although no college is mentioned).
It started with a cough, an autumn hack that refused to go away.
Then came the fevers. They bathed and chilled the skinny frame of Oswaldo Juarez, a 19-year-old Peruvian visiting to study English. His lungs clattered, his chest tightened and he ached with every gasp. During a wheezing fit at 4 a.m., Juarez felt a warm knot rise from his throat. He ran to the bathroom sink and spewed a mouthful of blood.
I'm dying, he told himself, "because when you cough blood, it's something really bad."
It was really bad, and not just for him.
Doctors say Juarez's incessant hack was a sign of what they have both dreaded and expected for years Ñ this country's first case of a contagious, aggressive, especially drug-resistant form of tuberculosis. The Associated Press learned of his case, which until now has not been made public, as part of a six-month look at the soaring global challenge of drug resistance.
Juarez's strain - so-called extremely drug-resistant (XXDR) TB - has never before been seen in the U.S., according to Dr. David Ashkin, one of the nation's leading experts on tuberculosis. XXDR tuberculosis is so rare that only a handful of other people in the world are thought to have had it.
"He is really the future," Ashkin said. "This is the new class that people are not really talking too much about. These are the ones we really fear because I'm not sure how we treat them."
This article is slim on details about Oswaldo (like whether he is just a common day laborer) and is strangely chipper in tone considering the topic, but it does have more background information than your average newspaper item. It even contains a mention of the taxpayer cost caused by the immigrant in question -- a rarity.
His treatment cost Florida taxpayers an estimated $500,000, a price tag medical director Ashkin says seems like an astronomical amount to spend on someone who's not an American citizen. But he questions how the world can afford not to treat Juarez and others sick with similar lethal strains.
If we're in the mood for spending piles of other people's money, why not invest more in border and workplace enforcement? Fewer Oswaldos would be a fine strategy for 21st century public health.
AP source: US knew of terror suspect
[12/26/09]
More than eight years after the 9/11 terror attacks, law enforcement against Islamic terrorism still has some large holes, for example allowing known jihadists access to American airplanes.
An official briefed on the attack on a Detroit airliner said Saturday the U.S. has known for at least two years that the suspect in the attack could have terrorist ties.
The official told The Associated Press that the suspect, Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab, has been on a list that includes people with known or suspected contact or ties to a terrorist or terrorist organization. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the investigation is ongoing.
The Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment list is maintained by the U.S. National Counterterrorism Center. It includes about 550,000 names.
People on that list are not necessarily on the no-fly list. Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., said Mutallab was not on the no-fly list.
King, the ranking Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee, said no federal air marshals were on the flights from Nigeria to Amsterdam and from Amsterdam to Detroit. Mutallab did not go through full-body image screening at either airport, the congressman said.
The first line of defense, unfortunately, is the US State Department official in Nigeria who handed a travel visa to a man known to have terrorist affiliations. And there are thousands more in State who don't want to insult anyone in the countries where they are stationed.
The father of the al Qaeda terrorist behind FridayÕs attempted explosion aboard a Northwest flight bound for Detroit reported his sonÕs fanatical religious views to the U.S. Embassy six months ago, according to a Nigerian news outlet.
The young man, Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab, is the son of Alhaji Umaru Mutallab, a former Nigerian minister and bank chairman. He became wary of his sonÕs religious beliefs and reported his activities to the U.S. Embassy as well as Nigerian security services half a year ago, according to the Nigerian newspaper This Day.
You just can't make up how brazen this crowd is. One week ago, President Obama quietly signed an executive order that makes an international police force immune from the restraints of American law.
Interpol is the shorthand for the International Criminal Police Organization. It was established in 1923 and operates in about 188 countries. ByÊexecutive order 12425, issued in 1983, President Reagan recognized Interpol as an international organization and gave it some of the privileges and immunities customarily extended to foreign diplomats. Interpol, however, is also an active law-enforcement agency, so critical privileges and immunities (set forth in Section 2(c) of the International Organizations Immunities Act) were withheld. Specifically, Interpol's property and assets remained subject to search and seizure, and its archived records remained subject to public scrutiny under provisions like the Freedom of Information Act. Being constrained by the Fourth Amendment, FOIA, and other limitations of the Constitution and federal law that protect the liberty and privacy of Americans is what prevents law-enforcement and its controlling government authority from becoming tyrannical.
On Wednesday, however, for no apparent reason, President Obama issued an executive order removing the Reagan limitations.ÊThat is, Interpol's property and assets are no longer subject to search and confiscation, and its archives are now considered inviolable. This international police forceÊ(whose U.S. headquarters is in the Justice Department in Washington)Êwill be unrestrained by the U.S. Constitution and American law while it operates in the United States and affects both Americans and American interests outside the United States.
Interpol works closely with international tribunals (such as the International Criminal Court Ñ which the United States has refused to join because of its sovereignty surrendering provisions, though top Obama officials want us in it). It also works closely with foreign courts and law-enforcement authorities (such as those in Europe that are investigating former Bush administration officials for purported war crimes Ñ i.e., for actions taken in America's defense).
Why would we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies? Why is it suddenly necessary to have, within the Justice Department, a repository for stashing government files which, therefore, will be beyond the ability of Congress, American law-enforcement, the media, and the American people to scrutinize?
Barack Obama's quest for historic health-care legislation has turned into a parody of leadership. We usually associate presidential leadership with the pursuit of goals that, though initially unpopular, serve America's long-term interests. Obama has reversed this. He's championing increasingly unpopular legislation that threatens the country's long-term interests. "This isn't about me," he likes to say, "I have great health insurance." But of course, it is about him: about the legacy he covets as the president who achieved "universal" health insurance. He'll be disappointed. [...]
The remaining uninsured may also exceed estimates. Under the Senate bill, they would total 24 million in 2019, reckons Richard Foster, chief actuary of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. But a wild card is immigration. From 1999 to 2008, about 60 percent of the increase in the uninsured occurred among Hispanics. That was related to immigrants and their children (many American-born). Most illegal immigrants aren't covered by Obama's proposal. If we don't curb immigration of the poor and unskilled -- people who can't afford insurance -- Obama's program will be less effective and more expensive than estimated. Hardly anyone mentions immigrants' impact, because it seems insensitive.
A man identified as an illegal immigrant was sentenced Monday to seven years in prison for leaving the scene of a fatal accident in Tulsa.
Roberto Salvador Alvelais-Torres, 28, pleaded guilty to five counts linked to a hit-and-run crash that claimed the life of bicyclist Beverly Duffield, 74, of Tulsa.
In accordance with a plea deal, Tulsa County District Judge Tom Gillert sentenced Alvelais-Torres to a seven-year prison term for leaving the scene, a felony.Ê
Alvelais-Torres received a concurrent one-year jail term Ñ which doesn't add to his time in custody Ñ for negligent homicide, a misdemeanor.
City of Tulsa records show 28-year-old Roberto Alvelais-Torres has been arrested at least twice before this week's arrest. [...]
Municipal court records show in 2003, Tulsa Police arrested Torres for DUI/Alcohol, Hit & Run, Transporting Beer and No Driver's License. [...]
However, that wasn't Torres' last run in with Tulsa Police. Records show three years later officers arrested him again on that 2003Êwarrant. Records show The City of Tulsa Court found him guilty and no jail time but Torres paid a $745 fine.
What does it take to get a tough sentence in this country against an illegal alien? Or are long prison terms reserved for citizens only?
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 80% of voters think relations between white Americans and black Americans are better today than they were in the 1960s. Just 11% say that isnÕt so.
Sixty-two percent (62%) also feel that relations between black and white Americans are getting better. Twenty percent (20%) say that relationship is getting worse, and 11% see it as about the same as it always has been.
However, just 40% of voters nationwide say relations between white Americans and Hispanics are getting better. Nearly as many (34%) say they are getting worse. Fifteen percent (15%) see no change. [...]
Voters are even more pessimistic about the relationship between African-Americans and Hispanics.
Eighteen percent (18%) say it's getting better, but twice as many (36%) say relations between the two are getting worse. Twenty percent (20%) say neither is the case, while another 26% are not sure.
Hispanics, particularly Mexicans remain snarly over requirements that their tribe follow American law.
A sore point for many Hispanics is the national debate over illegal immigration. By a 70% to 22% margin, voters say that gaining control of the borders is more important than legalizing the status of undocumented workers already in the country.
What is often lost in the debate over immigration reform, however, is that once the borders are controlled, most Americans favor a welcoming immigration policy provided it is done within the law. By a 55% to 27% margin, Americans favor a policy goal that would welcome everyone except criminals, national security threats and welfare dependants.
It should be noted that the link Ramussen provides in the paragraph above is from 2006, and the current worsened economy has reduced voter generosity to lawbreakers.
Hundreds of British schoolgirls are facing the terrifying prospect of female genital mutilation (FGM) over the Christmas holidays as experts warn the practice continues to flourish across the country. Parents typically take their daughters back to their country of origin for FGM during school holidays, but The Independent on Sunday has been told that "cutters" are being flown to the UK to carry out the mutilation at "parties" involving up to 20 girls to save money.
The police face growing criticism for failing to prosecute a single person for carrying out FGM in 25 years; new legislation from 2003 which prohibits taking a girl overseas for FGM has also failed to secure a conviction.
Experts say the lack of convictions, combined with the Government's failure to invest enough money in education and prevention strategies, mean the practice continues to thrive. Knowledge of the health risks and of the legislation remains patchy among practising communities, while beliefs about the supposed benefits for girls remain firm, according to research by the Foundation for Women's Health, Research and Development (Forward). [...]
The Somali model Waris Dirie was mutilated at the age of five. She set up the Waris Dirie Foundation in 2002 to help eradicate FGM. She said: "I am worried about the situation in Europe and the US, as FGM seems to be on the rise in these places. In the 21st century, a crime this cruel should not be accepted in a society as developed as England. No one can undo the trauma that is caused by this horrible crime; it stays in your head for ever. So what we should focus on is that there won't be another victim."
A Muslim chef who lost a claim of religious discrimination against Scotland Yard after complaining he was forced to cook sausages and bacon faces a legal bill of more than £75,000.
Hasanali Khoja accused the Metropolitan Police of failing to consider his Islamic beliefs when he was asked to handle pork products as a catering manager at a police station. Ê
The £23,000-a-year chef claimed suggestions by his bosses that he should wear gloves and use tongs left him 'stressed and humiliated'. Muslims are banned from eating pork under Islamic law.
But Mr Khoja, 62, lost his claim in May after a police employee told an employment tribunal how she saw Mr Khoja eat bacon rolls and sausages.
The Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA) has now won a ruling ordering Mr Khoja to pay its costs, which total at least £76,200. In its costs claim, the Met said Mr Khoja 'knew that he had asked for a bacon roll two or three times for personal consumption before bringing his claim and throughout the conduct of his claim'.
In fact, lying is part of Islamic culture. Not only do many Muslim immigrants hail from totalitarian countries (like Saudi Arabia) where occasional dissimulation is a wise strategy, Islam itself declares that lying to infidels is cool in the service of Allah (known as taqiyya). How easy for that attitude to slide over into the area of personal gain.
This case is yet another example that Muslim cultures are incompatible with our values, and Islamic immigration is therefore a big mistake. The Judeo-Christian scriptures condemn lying rather strongly.
Plus, we have plenty of homegrown thieves and liars (on display daily in Washington), and don't need to import additional lying weasels from abroad.
Two men have pleaded guilty to trying to steal 600 pounds of wildflower seed pods in southern Utah's Zion National Park in hopes of a payday on the commercial market.
Cresencio Martinez-Guzman, 44, and Cresencio Lucena-Alvarez, 23, pleaded guilty to felony theft of government property and were sentenced to probation Dec. 7. They also admitted being in the U.S. illegally and agreed not to fight deportation.
The pair had apparently spent weeks in a remote portion of the park pinching Palmer's penstemon, a tall-growing native plant whose seeds are often used by government agencies for reseeding projects, according to court records.
They were arrested in September after Zion park rangers spotted them with several large bags of seed pods inside the park's western boundary. The commercial value of the pair's cache was about $25,000, according to court documents. [...]
Palmer's penstemon, a short-lived native that produces showy pink flowers, is popular with government agencies because it grows fast, provides good ground-cover, slows erosion and does well in arid conditions.
Tulay Goren murder: 'honour' crimes doubling every year, figures show
[12/19/09] Diversity is getting worse for young Muslim women in Britain, as Islamic daddies apparently feel they can get away with more sharia-type behavior such as killing independent daughters (e.g. Tulay Goren, pictured). Or perhaps the authorities are waking up to what was there all along, but was hidden by media and elite praise for the wonderful new diversity enriching the country.
The number of murders, rapes and assaults on people who dare to break strict religious or cultural rules is doubling every year, police figures show, with up to two violent "honour crimes" being committed every day.
But charities which help victims of honour crimes say the true extent of the problem is far worse than the statistics show, as every year hundreds of victims - normally women - are too frightened to report attacks or to give evidence in court.
The escalating problem was highlighted yesterday as an Old Bailey jury convicted Mehmet Goren, 49, of the cold-blooded and premeditated murder of his 15-year-old daughter Tulay after she fell in love with someone from the "wrong" branch of Islam.
Miss Goren disappeared 10 years ago after telling a friend she might be pregnant but justice caught up with her father after his wife "courageously" testified against him and lifted what was described as the "cloak of secrecy" which surrounds honour crimes.
A prosecutor said the case was a "wake-up call" to the authorities over the extent of the problem in this country, which campaigners say is growing because of the rise of religious fundamentalism.
Actually, it's Muslim immigration that's growing, not so much "fundamentalism" (all of Islam, if you read the Koran). There are now 2.4 million Muslims residing in Britain, which they say is "nice" to them, though "cringing" and "submissive" would be better descriptions.
California's population growth slowed over the past year as tens of thousands of residents moved away - many of them heading to other Western states, according to the state Department of Finance.
The Golden State's population grew by 353,000 to 38.4 million from July 2008 to July 2009. The only years with lower growth rates since 1900 were 1994-96, according to a report released by the department Thursday.
More people left the state for other parts of the country than moved here, a difference of about 142,000 people. While that number is outweighed by people moving from other countries to California, it continues a trend of migration to other states that began in 2005.
Since that year, more than half a million more people have left California than have moved to the state. They mainly have moved to neighboring Western states, said Mary Heim, chief of the demographic research unit at the Department of Finance. In past years, more of those people moved to Nevada, but last year saw an increase in people moving to Oregon and Washington, she said. Texas also attracts a large number of Californians.
Hans Johnson, a demographer at the Public Policy Institute of California, said he is not surprised by the data.
"Most people who move to or from California do so for economic reasons, specifically jobs. Our unemployment rate is significantly higher than the rest of the country and when that happens, California tends to send more migrants to other states than we receive," Johnson said.
California's birthrate and immigration from outside the United States, both legal and illegal, kept the state's growth rate positive at 0.92 percent.
In other words, the foreigners keep coming. Plus many of those births are to foreign-born women (46 percent in 2006).
Below, diverse multilingual phones at the unemployment office in Glendale CA.
A sharply decreased level of foreign immigration, both legal and illegal, was apparently the major reason for the dropoff in population growth. The department says net migration - those moving into the state minus those that moved out - was just 37,000. It estimates that 179,000 foreign immigrants came to California during the year while 142,000 residents left for elsewhere. But the state's production of babies, its primary source of growth, remained high at 547,000, offset by 231,000 deaths.
Overall growth since the 2000 census is 4.6 million, the department says, and now stands at 38.5 million. The new estimates continue, however, a dispute between the state and the U.S. Census Bureau, which believes there are a million fewer Californians, primarily because the feds calculate that there's been far more outward migration than the state counts. The 2010 census apparently will resolve the issue, which affects the state's subventions from the federal government and how many congressional seats it will have.
Rare gender identity defect hits Gaza families
[12/18/09]
It's well known in the civilized, science-literate world that cousin marriage is a bad thing, leading to crippling birth defects, lowered IQ and early death, among other things. However, in many Muslim societies, consanguinity is considered highly desirable because of the advantage of keeping property within the family. In Saudi Arabia, it's estimated that 60 percent marry first or second cousins, despite its negative effects on health and intelligence.
Of course immigrants bring cousin marriage diversity when they come; e.g. while British Pakistanis are responsible for 3% of all births, they account for one in three British children born with genetic illnesses.
The practice was recently noted in Gaza, where the high incidence of consanguinity has led to many cases of a birth defect, male pseudohermaphrodism.
Nadir Mohammed Saleh and Ahmed Fayiz Abed Rabo are cousins and next-door neighbors. With their gelled hair, buttoned-down shirts and jeans, they look much like any other 16-year-old Palestinian boy. But looks, Ahmed says, can be deceiving.
"Only my appearance, my haircut and clothing, makes me look like a boy," Ahmed says, gesturing with his hands across his face. "Inside, I am like a female. I am a girl."
Until last summer, both Nadir and Ahmed were -- for all intents and purposes -- girls. They wore female headscarves, attended girls' school and even answered to the female first names Navin and Ola.
Both Nadir and Ahmed were born with a rare birth defect called male pseudohermaphrodism.
Deficiency of the hormone 17-B-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (17-B-HSD) during pregnancy left their male reproductive organs deformed and buried deep within their abdomens.
At birth, doctors identified Nadir and Ahmed as girls, because they appeared to have female genitalia. [...]
Dr. Jehad Abudaia, a Canadian-Palestinian pediatrician and urologist practicing in Gaza, says he has diagnosed nearly 80 cases like Nadir's and Ahmed's in the last seven years.
"It is astonishing that we have [so] many cases with this defect, which is very rare all over the world," Abudaia says. He attributes the high frequency of this birth defect to "consanguinity," or in-breeding.
"If you want to go to the root of the problem, this problem runs in families in the genes." Abudaia says. "They want to get married to cousins... they don't go to another family. This is a problem."
Study: European Muslims Feel Shut Out
[12/17/09] Time magazine has cranked out some pro-Islam propaganda, by way of George Soros. According to a "study" from Soros' Open Society, Muslims are misunderstood little lambs who only want to be part of the European community. (If so, they have a funny way of showing it.)
The recent Swiss referendum vote to ban the building of minarets seemed to confirm a trend: Europeans are becoming increasingly strident in their attempts to "protect" their culture against Islam. However, a newly published report by the Open Society Institute (OSI), a think tank set up by billionaire financier and philanthropist George Soros, details the complex relationship between Muslims and non-Muslim Europeans and reveals that the suspicion is mutual. Muslims believe they are being shut out of European society.
About 20 million Muslims live in the European Union, mostly in capital cities and large industrial towns; they already make up 25% of the population in Marseilles, France, and Rotterdam in the Netherlands; 20% in Malm, Sweden; 15% in Brussels and Birmingham, England; and 10% in London, Paris and Copenhagen. The report, published on Dec. 15, surveyed Muslims in 11 cities across the E.U. and found that 55% of respondents believed religious discrimination had risen in the past five years. And while many Muslims are a long-standing and integral part of the fabric of their cities, the report says they are still almost three times more likely to be unemployed than non-Muslims. But far from seeking out Islamic ghettos, many Muslim families appear desperately keen to integrate. "A lot of Muslims Ñ especially parents Ñ were sad they could not live in mixed neighborhoods, where they could experience diversity," says Tufyal Choudhury, lead author of the report.
Muslim immigrants are pining to "experience diversity" -- how charming! (But such feelings exist only in the Soros imaginary universe.)
The findings echo earlier research revealing hostility toward Muslims and other minority groups. The Fundamental Rights Agency report, released on Dec. 9, surveyed more than 23,000 individuals from ethnic minority and immigrant groups about their experiences of discrimination, racist crime and policing in the E.U. Minorities commonly face discrimination while looking for a job, shopping or visiting the doctor, according to the report, which labeled as "shocking" the racist, anti-immigrant and Islamophobic experiences of minorities as they go about their daily lives. A 2004 study by Sorbonne sociologist Jean-Franois Amadieu found that a standard rsum with a Muslim name was five times less likely to elicit an interview than the same rsum with a non-Muslim name.
In fact, a 2006 poll found a different result on the subject of accepting the society in which they have settled: Poll reveals 40pc of Muslims want sharia law in UK. A Pew poll from that year showed still more negativity: Poll shows Muslims in Britain are the most anti-western in Europe.
Time's coverage of this issue is an attempt to normalize a hostile population that has come to conquer, not assimilate. Muslims residing in Europe have NEVER stood up against terrorism. They only complain when their immediate comfort is threatened.
The photo below is from the Time article, where one sign translates to "We are Muslims, not Hitler."
Which is funny, given the following:
Jury finds Haq guilty in Jewish Federation Center
[12/17/09] It's good news indeed whenever a jury rejects the usual insanity defense in a jihadist murder case. This one required a second trial after the first one failed to reach a verdict.
The original crime was the terrorist 2006 attack on the Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle in which one woman was killed (Pam Waechter, pictured) and five others were shot. After shooter Naveed Haq forced his way into the office, he stated, "I'm a Muslim American; I'm angry at Israel," and then started firing.
Jewish Federation shooter Naveed Haq was found guilty of aggravated murder Tuesday, with jurors unanimously rejecting claims of insanity raised by the defense.
Haq, 34, had been charged with aggravated first-degree murder in the July 28, 2006, shooting that left one woman dead and another five seriously injured. The jury convicted him on all eight counts, including five counts of attempted murder.
Echoing King County Prosecutor Dan Satterberg's description of the attack as "our state's worst hate crime," shooting survivor Carol Goldman said the verdict was an indictment of Haq's views and actions.
A change in prosecution strategy may have made the difference in getting a conviction, as hinted in a Nov 5 news article, 'You should be proud,' Haq told mother after shootings. This information about Haq's jihadist motivation was not presented to the jury in the first trial.
In the days after he killed one woman and wounded five others at the Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle, Naveed Haq telephoned his mother from jail and proclaimed, "You should be proud of me. I'm a martyr now. I'm going to go to heaven," according to a recording played Wednesday during his trial. [...]
"I'm proud of what I did," Haq said to his sobbing mother in one call placed from the King County Jail to his parent's home in the Tri-Cities. "I'm a soldier. I'm a soldier of Islam."
Group's Census promo called 'blasphemous'
[12/16/09] While some Hispanics support a boycott of the upcoming Census count, others want every illegal adult, teen and anchor baby toted up for the future billions of dollars in social services those numbers will attract from the spendo-goverrnment.
As it happens, Mexicans in particular are fixated in December on the image of Mary and Joseph searching unsuccessfully for a place to spend the night. They think that they, as illegal aliens, are similar to the holy family, believing that the inconvenience of full-up hotels is somehow like the semi-unwelcome they receive in America. It's another Mexican delusion, because Mary and Joseph were where they were supposed to be, unlike millions of Mexes.
Anyway, the image of the holy family has been further turned into another propaganda ploy because of an odd twist of illegal Mexican culture.
A push to spread the gospel about the 2010 Census this Christmas is stoking controversy with a campaign that links the government count to events surrounding the birth of Jesus.
The National Association of Latino Elected Officials is leading the distribution to churches and clergy of thousands of posters that depict the arrival of Joseph and a pregnant Mary in Bethlehem more than 2,000 years ago. As chronicled in the Gospel of Luke, Joseph returned to be counted in a Roman census, but he and Mary found no room at an inn, and Jesus was born in a manger.
"This is how Jesus was born," the poster states. "Joseph and Mary participated in the Census."
Most of the posters are in Spanish and target Latino evangelicals, says Jose Cruz, senior director of civic engagement at the Latino association, which launched its Ya Es Hora (It's Time) campaign in 2006 to promote voter registration among Latinos.
It is promoting the Census, used to help allocate $400 billion a year in federal dollars, redraw state and local political districts and determine the number of seats each state gets in Congress.
Interestingly, at least one Hispanic thinks the campaign is off the reservation.
The Rev. Miguel Rivera, chairman of the National Coalition of Latino Clergy and Christian Leaders, says invoking the name of Jesus to promote the 2010 Census is "blasphemous" and "violates the concept of separation of church and state." Using the name of Jesus for "a political and secular intention, it is definitely an assault against our Christian faith," Rivera says.
Despite the objections of one clergyman, it appears the campaign will go forward since money still comes first for immigrants, aliens and their supportive infrastructure.
I put the question to a Democratic strategist who asked to remain anonymous. Yes, Democrats certainly understand that voters don't like the current bills, he told me, and they are fully aware they will probably pay a price next year. But they have found a way to view going ahead anyway as the logical thing to do, at least in their eyes.
You have to look at the issue from three different Democratic perspectives: the House of Representatives, the White House and the Senate.
"In the House, the view of [California Rep. Henry] Waxman and [House Speaker Nancy] Pelosi is that we've waited two generations to get health care passed, and the 20 or 40 members of Congress who are going to lose their seats as a result are transitional players at best," he said. "This is something the party has wanted since Franklin Roosevelt." In this view, losses are just the price of doing something great and historic. (The strategist also noted that it's easy for Waxman and Pelosi to say that, since they come from safely liberal districts.)
"At the White House, the picture is slightly different," he continued. "Their view is, 'We're all in on this, totally committed, and we don't have to run for re-election next year. There will never be a better time to do it than now.'"
Now transpose this mindset to illegal immigration. Democrat generals are already willing to kill off dozens of soldiers to win the battle of healthcare. Many moderates are dead Democrats walking. Speaker Pelosi and others may strategize that an unpopular amnesty would nevertheless assure a permanent Democrat majority in the future, and would be worth the cost in lost seats. Therefore, now is the time to ram through the far-left immigration agenda, before the voters can strike back next November.
In for a dime, in for a dollar, as they say.
Many bright people think that the Dems' amnesty legislation (submitted this week by amnesty cheerleader Rep. Luis Gutierrez) is going nowhere fast. Mark Krikorian calls it Dead on Arrival. Joe Guzzardi says Reid, Amnesty, Won't Make It. Rick Oltman thinks that business elites prefer the current messy system: Comprehensive (Unofficial) Amnesty.
This kind of thinking is reasonable and appropriate for normal times, but now is not normal. Representative government is under assault today as never before. The Democrat majority and President show no interest in what the people want -- in issues of healthcare, national security, immigration and crazed spending. It's frightening to behold. My fear is that Dems will forge ahead with policies that are suicidal in the short run, but pay off for them over the longer term.
The big hope has to be that Pelosi's "transitional players" aren't willing to be road kill for healthcare or amnesty.
The sexual harassment of women in the streets, schools and work places of the Arab world is driving them to cover up and confine themselves to their homes, said activists at the first-ever regional conference addressing the once taboo topic.
Activists from 17 countries across the region met in Cairo for a two-day conference ending Monday and concluded that harassment was unchecked across the region because laws don't punish it, women don't report it and the authorities ignore it.
The harassment, including groping and verbal abuse, is a daily experience women in the region face and makes them wary of going into public spaces, whether it's the streets or jobs, the participants said. It happens regardless of what women are wearing.
With more and more women in schools, the workplace and politics, roles have changed but often traditional attitudes have not. Experts said in some places, like Egypt, harassment appears sometimes to be out of vengeance, from men blaming women for denied work opportunities. [...]
As many as 90 percent of Yemeni women say they have been harassed, while in Egypt, out of a sample of 1,000, 83 percent reported being verbally or physically abused.
A study in Lebanon reported that more than 30 percent of women said they had been harassed there.
"We are facing a phenomena that is limiting women's right to move ... and is threatening women's participation in all walks of life," said Nehad Abul Komsan, an Egyptian activist who organized the event with funding from the U.N. and the Swedish development agency.
Harassment has long been a problem in Mideast nations. But it was little discussed until three years ago, when blogs gave posted amateur videos showing a crowd of men assaulting women in downtown Cairo during a major Muslim holiday in one of the most shocking harassment incidents in the region.
Egyptians are horrified by the news that women have been assaulted by hordes of young men in the centre of the capital, Cairo.
An Immigration Time-Out
[12/15/09] John Derbyshire has an interesting mathematical twist on the immigration issue, where he critiques a math book for its sudden deviation away from logic and into corucopian fantasies. On the basis of this and other examples, he laments that "big national policies are... deeply irrational."
[Steven] Landsburg summons up our memories of Goofus and Gallant, protagonists of the moral-education comic strip in the Highlights for Children magazine:
Goofus erects a border fence. Gallant says, "Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me." . . . Goofus, being a jerk, would consign millions of unskilled Mexicans to lives of desperate poverty because Ñ well, because he doesn't think they count for very much.
Now, we have it on the authority of the Pew Research Center pollsters that one Mexican in three would move to the U.S.A., given the opportunity. That would be 37 million, to add to the 12 million Mexican-born residents we already have. Perhaps Goofus thinks that 49 million immigrants from one country would be too much of an imposition on American citizens, and a demographic catastrophe for the sending nation. Why is that jerkish?
And why this favoritism towards Mexicans? They do not live Òlives of desperate poverty.Ó The CIA World Factbook shows a 2008 per capita GDP of $14,300, ranking Mexico as the 79th richest of the 229 jurisdictions listed Ñ richer than Romania, Turkey, and Brazil. To put it another way, there are 140 places in the world poorer than Mexico. Why isnÕt it Gallant whoÕs being a jerk, favoring these comparatively prosperous Mexicans over the much poorer people of Albania ($6,000), Kyrgyzstan ($2,200), Nepal ($1,100), and Zimbabwe ($200)? Why is that not jerkish? [...]
What is on display here in both cases is that in the U.S.A., among a sizable segment of the cognitive elites, immigration is the focus of a hysterical cult. The contemplation of this topic causes literate, well-educated people to take temporary leave of their senses. It also excites them to a moralizing frenzy, in which those who disagree are seen as irredeemably wicked, in the grip of dark forces, gloating in cruelty, all pity choked with custom of fell deeds Ñ or at the very least, as jerks.
Plus, I'm convinced that many well heeled members of the "hysterical cult" benefit directly from permissive immigration by having cheap illegal alien household help.
Immigration bill backers try again despite jobless rate
[12/15/09]
During the Great Depression, America was not infested with foreigners who work daily to undermine this country's sovereignty and culture of laws. But today, La Raza and similar ilk have virtually unlimited funds to pursue their leftist agenda of multiculturalism and no borders.
Democrats on Tuesday begin their new push for an immigration bill, hamstrung by the image of legalizing millions of illegal immigrant workers at a time when the unemployment rate stands at 10 percent -- more than twice what it was the last time Congress tried to act.
"It certainly will confuse the debate a lot more, but at the end of the day what we have to understand is fixing this system will be good for American workers," said Eliseo Medina, executive vice president of the Service Employees International Union, which is one of the major advocates for legalizing illegal immigrant workers.
Rep. Luis V. Gutierrez, the Illinois Democrat who has taken over leadership on the issue after the death of Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat, plans to introduce an immigration legalization bill Tuesday, and backers are planning a strategy to avoid repeats of the failed attempts of 2006 and 2007.
In a letter to members of Congress last week seeking support for the bill, Mr. Gutierrez and Rep. Nydia M. Velazquez, New York Democrat and chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, said their legislation will end the off-the-books economy of illegal immigrant workers and protect American workers by raising labor standards.
"In these difficult economic times, we must ensure that everyone contributes toward the recovery and prosperity of our nation," they wrote. "To this end, it is imperative that all individuals and employers pay their fair share in taxes."
A draft overview of the bill, circulated with the letter, ends some enforcement tools such as the 287(g) local police cooperation program, calls for an electronic verification system to replace the voluntary E-verify program, argues that there's no need for more U.S. Border Patrol agents or fencing, and establishes a long-term path to citizenship for illegal immigrants.
That path would require illegal immigrants to pay a $500 fine, pass a background check and learn English and civics to gain legal status. After six years, they could apply for legal permanent residence, or a green card, which is the interim step to citizenship. There is no "touchback" provision requiring them to return to their home countries at some point in the process. [...]
"With 15 million Americans out of work, it's hard to believe that anyone would give amnesty to 12 million illegal immigrants," said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee. "Even the open-borders crowd agrees that illegal immigrants take jobs from American workers, particularly poor and disadvantaged citizens and legal immigrants. This is exactly why we need to oppose amnesty."
More than half of the nationÕs unemployed workers have borrowed money from friends or relatives since losing their jobs. An equal number have cut back on doctor visits or medical treatments because they are out of work.
Almost half have suffered from depression or anxiety. About 4 in 10 parents have noticed behavioral changes in their children that they attribute to their difficulties in finding work.
Joblessness has wreaked financial and emotional havoc on the lives of many of those out of work, according to a New York Times/CBS News poll of unemployed adults, causing major life changes, mental health issues and trouble maintaining even basic necessities.
This misery could be cut substantially if Washington required universal E-verify for every working person, but that won't happen with the D-gang in charge, and few Republicans are proviiding leadership against the open-borders Marxicans.
La Posada at border fence
[12/15/09]
The Mexican pre-Christmas celebration of Las Posadas has often been hijacked in this country for anti-border propaganda. Raza types in southern California have gathered for years at the annual walk-and-whine procession to the border to equate illegal aliens with Joseph and Mary (an inaccurate comparison, when examined).
IMPERIAL BEACH - Faith groups from the United States and Mexico gathered yesterday afternoon at Border Field State Park in what was both a religious celebration and a political statement.
The 16th annual La Posada Sin Fronteras was a re-enactment of the biblical story of Mary and Joseph, who were forced to seek shelter after the birth of Christ and were eventually welcomed into a stranger's home. Participants from both countries compared the biblical tale to the struggle migrants face trying to enter the United States.
One of the messages of the story, the idea of welcoming strangers -- and immigrants -- is under attack in our times, making the binational celebration even more significant, organizers said. Today, families on both sides of the border are separated by immigration policy and can no longer meet, even at the border fence, organizers said.
Illegal alien supporters like to quote the Bible verse that says to "welcome the stranger" but the Good Book may have had a temporary visit in mind, not a permanent invasion of millions.
There's a better verse from scripture...
"Amen, amen I say to you: He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up another way, the same is a thief and a robber." (John 10:1)
L.A. Latinos celebrate a patron saint and a culture
[12/14/09]
The Catholic church has long encouraged Mexican immigrants and illegal aliens to keep their home culture rather than assimilate to American society. Even though the church is given tax-exempt status (which requires it keep its nose out of politics), it works purposefully to undermine the sovereignty of this country.
Sadly, many of the Protestant churches are mindless anti-borders flunkies also, but since most Hispanics are Catholic, that church in particular sees open borders and increased Hispanic pew-fillers positively. The cassock brigades are the big dogs in the pack here, both as activists and beneficiaries.
The story of the Virgin of Guadalupe is something of a foundation myth to Mexicans, so the festival celebration is a big deal.
The Dec. 12 feast day holds special significance for Catholics of Mexican heritage.
Catholic tradition teaches that a peasant, Juan Diego, was walking over a hill called Tepeyac, a site linked to an ancient fertility goddess, when a brown-skinned woman appeared. She spoke in Nahuatl, language of the Aztecs, and asked that a church be built on the hill, which is near Mexico City.
For the faithful, the image of the Virgin of Guadalupe is more than symbol, Estrada said. "It's real," he said. "It is like a person that gives you strength and courage."
Furthermore, the church's efforts are not just cultural but political. Our Lady Queen of Angels Church uses the occasion to promote its anti-American, pro-amnesty agenda.
The church has also been known for political activism. A sign outside the complex reads Madre sin fronteras -- mother without borders -- an allusion to immigration policy in the U.S.
The church uses each year's feast day theme to convey a message, its priests said.
This year, they chose "Do not be afraid, I am with you." They wanted to use the message to persuade illegal Latino immigrants to participate in the 2010 Census, Estrada said. "It's important that everyone is counted," the pastor said.
Estrada pointed to the plight of the poor and the undocumented in Los Angeles as reasons the story of the Virgin still resonates.
"These are the Juan Diegos," Estrada said. "These are the poor and the people she really speaks to.
"Here in this church, it's not purely religious. We don't just say Mass and give confessions. We help organize people to treat themselves with dignity and express their culture."
This church's mission sounds suspiciously like Alinsky-style community organizing with a big dollop of Mexican self-esteem on top. It certainly has little resemblance to spreading the gospel.
Dancers mark the Virgin's feast day at Our Lady Queen of Angels Church. "We celebrate as if it were in Mexico," said Father Paschal Amagba, an associate pastor of the church. "When the people come here, they feel at home."
Pictured: Islamic militants stone man to death for adultery in Somalia as villagers are forced to watch
[12/14/09]
Tiger Woods should avoid the Mogadishu Open when he returns to golf from his time-out to repair his marriage (or so he says), since adultury is taken seriously in Somalia by Allah's gangsters.
Seriously, the photos below show the gruesome reality of Islamic sharia law, which Muslim immigrants wish to install throughout the West, including our country.
This barbaric scene belongs in the Dark Ages, but pictures emerged today of a group of Islamic militants who forced villagers to watch as they stoned a man to death for adultery.
Mohamed Abukar Ibrahim, a 48-year-old, was buried in a hole up to his chest and pelted with rocks until he died.
The group responsible, Hizbul Islam, also shot dead a man they claimed was a murderer. [...]
But when some Hizbul Islam fighters wanted to delay the executions, a bloody gun battle broke out between the two factions, shocked residents said.Ê
'Three Hizbul Islam fighters died and five others were injured after they fought each other," Halima Osman, an Afgoye shopkeeper, told Reuters in Mogadishu by telephone.
'Some wanted to delay the execution while the others insisted. They exchanged fire. The group that was against the execution was overpowered and chased away,' she said.
Isn't that nice... several Muslim fellows were killed by their pals for being insufficiently blood thirsty.
Al Shabaab, and to a lesser extent Hizbul Islam, are fighting the government to impose their harsh interpretation of Islamic Sharia law across the drought-ravaged country.
'Al Shabaab clerics have banned movies, dancing at weddings and playing or watching soccer in the areas under their control, as well as carrying out executions and amputations.
Below, the offending adulterer is semi-buried in preparation for his execution as villagers look on in the background.
The stoning proceeds, with apparent enthusiasm on the part of the stoners, until the man dies. The face has been pixilated in the interest of taste.
Bear in mind that Somalis are welcomed to America like few other groups. The State Department has admitted over 80,000 Somalis as refugees in the last 25 years (as calculated by Refugee Resettlement Watch). Somalis are also included in the Diversity Visa lottery; 229 slots in 2010, although in 2002, Washington offered a generous 1,328 visas in that category. (In 2007, a GAO report found that the program had admitted nearly 10,000 from terrorist states.) The 2000 Census counted 35,760 Somali-born persons; however, a CBS news report from this year (FBI Watching Somali Muslims In Minneapolis) put the number in Minnapolis alone at 70,000.
Furthermore, Somalis residing in this country have traveled back to their home country to pursue jihad to kill infidels and purify Islam. Perhaps some are included among the masked stoners.
Is this the kind of diversity America wants?
Switzerland's recent vote to ban the construction of new minarets has shocked and angered Muslims around the world. But the controversial move also reflects a growing sense of unease among other Europeans who have trouble coming to terms with Islam's increased visibility. [...]
The Swiss decision has shocked Europe and the world because its ramifications go far beyond the building of minarets -- they also concern the identity of an entire continent. This was a referendum on Western society's perception of Islam as a threat. The issue is generating intense debate: Just how much of Islam is predominantly Christian Europe prepared to accept? The decision by the otherwise so tolerant Alpine country reveals the deep-seated fear of an Islam that is becoming increasingly visible.
Are Muslim immigrants threatening European values? This is a concern shared by many Europeans across the continent. Surveys last week revealed that 44 percent of Germans oppose the construction of minarets, followed by 41 percent of the French. Fifty-five percent of all Europeans see Islam as an intolerant religion. [...]
American author and journalist Christopher Caldwell recently published his latest tome, "Reflections on the Revolution in Europe: Immigration, Islam and the West," a widely-read and skeptical book on Europe and its Muslim immigrants. What fascinates him about the result of the Swiss vote is the gap between the rejection of the ban in surveys and the considerable support that it received during the referendum. "It means there is an official discussion of Islam and that there is a subterranean discussion of it," he says. "That should worry Europeans."
Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Green argued that Mamie Manneh was not entitled to leniency because she has 11 prior arrests - including one for running over her husband's suspected mistress with an SUV - and cooked up a bogus defense that she had a constitutional right to eat bushmeat.
"Your daughter calls you 'supermom,' so the picture is not so clear," said Brooklyn Federal Judge Raymond Dearie.
Mamie Manneh, 41, was busted in 2006 when Kennedy Airport agents found hacked-up animal heads and haunches stashed in a shipment of smoked fish.
Brooklyn federal Judge Raymond Dearie cut Manneh a break, he said, because she suffers from mental illness and has 11 children at home.
But he also gave her a stern warning not to violate her probationary terms. Her long rap sheet includes charges of selling stolen clothing and running down her husband's girlfriend with an SUV.
Renowned primatologist Jane Goodall urged the judge who will sentence a Staten Island woman who imported illegal monkey meat from Africa to consider the "gravity" of the crime.
Goodall's letter to Federal Judge Raymond Dearie was released on the eve of Mamie Manneh's sentencing Friday.
"As a leader in the global community, the U.S. has a responsibility to uphold and strongly enforce" laws to curb the "devastating impact unregulated consumption of wildlife is having on species populations in Africa," Goodall, 75, wrote.
She also stressed that bringing illegal wildlife into the U.S. could have "grave consequences on public health."
A prosecution expert said monkey meat could cause outbreaks of Ebola, measles, tuberculosis and retroviruses similar to HIV.
Epidemiologists have shown that ebola can be contracted by butchering chimpanzees, and the first human case of H.I.V. probably originated through similar exposure, said Nathan Wolfe, a professor of epidemiology at the University of California in Los Angeles. The growth in global demand for wild game, he said, increases the potential for spreading agents "that could represent serious threats to humanity," he said.
So the consumption of monkey meat is not a harmless custom of diverse immigrants, but a danger to public health.
Mary and Joseph, as Illegal Immigrants
[12/11/09]
In the sanctuary city of San Francisco, illegal aliens feel especially free to compare their lawbreaking behavior to that of the holy family, which if not blasphemous is certainly arrogant. Specifically, Mexicans use their traditional posadas procession, which re-enacts Joseph and Mary unsuccessfully searching for an inn, as a way to whine childishly about law and borders. (See Mexicans' Merry Posadas! for more about hijacking a religious custom for a political agenda.)
La Posarela, a bilingual musical play, re-enacts the biblical journey of a young couple who traveled from Nazareth to Bethlehem in search of a place to sleep with their first-born child Jesus.
But as told in the 45-minute play, free at 7 p.m. on Dec. 11 and Dec. 12 at the Community Music Center, the themes of homelessness, undocumented immigration and health care come to the fore.
"Ay, Jose. Maybe, after all, this city willÊcontinue to be a sanctuary city forÊillegal pilgrims like us," Ana Ortiz, who plays Mary, tellsÊJoseph.
Rooted in the Mexican tradition of the bible narrative, La Posarela tells the story of Mary and Joseph going from inn to inn looking for shelter. Each time, they are turned away.
Note: Joseph and Mary were turned away because the lodging establishments were already full, because they were crowded with many people also traveling to be counted in the census. To that extent, the analogy holds up. As the late photographer Ansel Adams remarked, "When the theater's full, they don't sell lap-space."
Another interesting point of logical dislocation is how some of today's illegals propose to boycott the census, unlike Joseph and Mary who scrupulously followed the law.
The search symbolizes today's social perils -- in the Mission District and across the country -- of trying to find shelter and undocumented immigrants trying to belong, said Chus Alonso, the play's music director.ÊIt can also symbolize a person's search for the truth, he added. [...]
Luis De la Vega, who plays Joseph, said he enjoys sharing his heritage with others.
"When I was asked by my teacher if I wanted to participate, I said yes, this is a great way to showcase our Latino culture."
Yes, Luis, tell everyone about your Hispanic pride in the disdain for law.
"Arriba, Mary, we have an anchor baby!" exclaimed Mexican Joseph.
Survey says 25% of young Hispanics identify themselves as American first
[12/11/09]
Say, wasn't America the country that was the gold standard for assimilation of immigrants? Not so much any more.
Anti-assimilation is taught in the nation's schools by the glorification of multiculturalism, which promotes separatism. Plus, there are the influences of Spanish media and racist interest groups like La Raza, plus the ease of communication with the home country.
What makes an American?
The question is asked in a new study by the Pew Hispanic Center that looks at a population group of 7.7 million making a historical mark Ð Hispanics between the ages of 16 to 25.
"Never before in the nation's history has a minority group made up so much of our young population," said Paul Taylor, director of the Washington-based Pew Hispanic Center and the executive vice president of the Pew Research Center.
Yet when these young people were asked for a term to first describe themselves, only a quarter chose "American," according to a national survey of 2,012 people. If they were the U.S.-born children of immigrants, the American description rose to one-third. If they were the grandchildren of immigrants or even more removed from migration, half were likely to identify themselves as American.
For an explanation of how our schools once taught American values, see Victor Davis Hanson's remembrance of his early education in a California farm town, The Civic Education America Needs.
THE HAGUE, 09/12/09 - The Haagsche Hogeschool college will not put up a Christmas tree this year because it does not want to cause provocation to immigrant students. The tree is too closely linked with Christianity, according to the school management.
Traditionally, a meters-high tree always stood in the school's atrium. Now there are only some streamers and fairy lights hanging there. Management wants to "stress the international character and the diversity within the school" by this move. The school is opting for "light and heat," which can be enjoyed by everyone in his or her own manner, according to the management.
The college has 20,000 students. Thirty percent are of immigrant origin, as are 12 percent of the teachers. Many pupils expressed fury on the Internet about the decision not to put up a tree this year. "Because a handful of religious good-for-nothings take offence about a tree with some lights and coloured balls, the rest of the school community has to suffer," complained one pupil.
Muslim men who force their wives to wear a burkha are not welcome in France, the country's justice minister has said.
Michelle Alliot-Marie said husbands making their wives wear a full body coverings did not 'share the nation's values'.
They would have their citizenship requests rejected, she said.
French President Nicolas Sarkozy said Switzerland's vote to ban new minarets showed why it was vital for France to hold an extended debate on national identity despite criticism that it has only fuelled racist views.
In a column in the daily Le Monde on Tuesday, Mr. Sarkozy defended the Swiss referendum against widespread criticism in France, saying it had laid bare fears of a loss of identity that should not be ignored.
"Instead of condemning the Swiss out of hand, we should try to understand what they meant to express and what so many people in Europe feel, including people in France," he wrote. [...]
Mr. Sarkozy said he would fight any form of discrimination against Muslims in France, but added that they had to adapt themselves to the values of France's secular Republic and its strict neutrality in religious matters.
Considering that the refugee influx causes increases in all legal and illegal immigration as family and social networks are established in the U.S., the U.N. is effectively dictating much of U.S. immigration policy.
A nonprofit nation of hundreds of taxpayer-funded organizations has grown up around refugee resettlement in the U.S. A government-funded study finds "U.S. resettlement communities are awash with ECBOs that exist in name only but provide little meaningful assistance." ECBO stands for Ethnic Community Based Organization, a government-defined category of grant recipients.
The expansion of the fraud-prone refugee program and the transformation of refugee resettlement into a federal contracting business have given birth to a global refugee industry well-adapted to the federal grant and contract environment.
Catholic Charities with its parent the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB ) is the largest refugee agency both nationally and in Nashville. It is neither a charity nor Catholic, but more an extension of a state welfare agency.
Sixty-five percent of Catholic Charities USA's $3.6 billion annual budget comes from government sources. Refugee resettlement, a relatively small portion of its services, is covered by the government at closer to 100 percent. For nonprofits, it is profitable to be in refugee resettlement, and the executive directors of some of the 10 major resettlement agencies make almost as much as the president of the United States.
Nashville Catholic Charities devotes about 26 percent of its budget to "immigrants and refugees," an amazingly high percentage considering most of that aid is going to recent refugee arrivals Ñ a fraction of 1 percent of Nashville's population. Interestingly, Tennessee recently put Nashville Catholic Charities in charge of distributing and monitoring federal "refugee" grant money to other NGOs in the state.
George Jonas: What jihadists hate most
[12/09/09]
This article reflects on the video below, which deserves wide distribution because of the psychological issues it includes. The "former terrorist" interviewed was Dr. Tawfik Hamid of Cairo, who joined a terror group at the university where he studied medicine. But when his Islamist pals wanted him to bury a policeman alive, he decided a life dedicated to terror was not for him.
Later in the interview, in answer to the question of who is the "enemy" -- is it the West, any non-Muslim, the Jews -- Dr. Tawfik is unequivocal:
"The West, but in particular, women's rights. Women's rights was the first enemy for us." He adds that it's strange feminism should have been the biggest gripe of jihadists, but it was. He is emphatic that this is why, wherever a "radical [Islamist] group" acquires power, the first thing it does is suppress women.
"First thing, before anything else, they tell women not to go out, to wear the hijab ..."
According to Islam, tyranny begins at home. Enslaving the women of the family serves to indoctrinate young males into the oppression inherent in the ideology.
The basic approach to the outer world -- submit to Islam or die -- depends on thug aptitude, not persuasion. Islam was famously spread by the sword, and even today brute strength and ruthlessness are valued. And a boy who can kill his sister for violating the family's "honor" makes a perfect assassin.
It's not altogether surprising that feminism looms larger among the grievances of Islamist militancy than the historic loss of the Caliphate, the Ottoman Empire, or even the "catastrophe" of a Jewish state in the Middle East. Cultures, like people, often have a greater tolerance for injury than for insult. When the West added the perceived "insult" of women's rights in the second half of the 20th century to the injury of outpacing, outperforming and outflanking the House of Islam in the first half, feminism emerged as the straw that broke the camel's back.
Muslim supremacists might have coped with modernity relegating their culture to second place behind the runaway success of Western civilization, but couldn't tolerate a challenge to their status as patriarchs in their homes. Their chauvinistic strings, wound tight by the territorial, technological, military, geographic and economic reduction of Islam over the last 400 years, snapped when plucked under their own roofs by their own wives and daughters.
There's a lot good in the analysis directly above, although I have some quibbles. The extreme sexual repression enforced upon Muslim males has to be understood as central in creating an irrational fury against women, particularly since the genders are very segregated and premarital sex is strictly forbidden in the Islamic world. The poor economies in many countries provide few job opportunities, which prevents many from marrying until later. The situation creates enormous social pathology which is cruel beyond what most westerners can imagine.
The anger erupts in expressions of violent harassment against women. For example, nearly two-thirds of Egyptian men admit sexually harassing women. Even Islamically dressed women in Saudi Arabia are often bothered unmercifully when they try to get a little exercise by walking. In 2006, bloggers reported hundreds of marauding males attacked women in downtown Cairo during celebrations of the end of Ramadan. When Muslim men immigrate to the West, gang rape of infidel women becomes a problem.
So Muslim males tend to become miffed when they see western women acting as free individuals rather than Allah's doormats, as the doctor observed.
The number of immigrants living in Britain has almost doubled in less than three decades, official figures show.
More than 10 per cent of the population - 6.7million - were born abroad, the Office for National Statistics has found.
The analysis shows that the count of those born abroad - now agreed to be the best figure for measuring the rate of immigration - is two million higher than it was just eight years ago.Ê
One in five Britons, twice the European average, thought immigration was the most important issue facing the country. Only the Italians came close to sharing that view. While scepticism towards the benefits of immigration grew in all European countries, two out of three Britons, more than in all the other countries surveyed, thought immigration was more of a problem than an opportunity.
It's not a bad time to review the findings of a 2007 Pew Research Center study, World Publics Welcome Global Trade -- But Not Immigration. The point is that people don't want their home society swamped with strangers from a foreign culture. It's human nature to prefer one's own tribe.
Given the worsened worldwide economy, it's likely the pro-restriction numbers would be higher today.
A Wyoming man had a blood-alcohol level of 0.179 -- more than twice the legal limit -- when he drove across the centerline and killed an 80-year-old man, court records show.
The victim, Leonard Dykstra, a grandfather of five, died Friday night on the road just three minutes from his home.
Efrain Garcia-Miron, 32, was arraigned Monday in 59th District Court on a charge of operating while impaired causing death. If convicted, he could face up to 15 years in prison.
Dykstra, a retired U.S. Postal worker, had spent Friday evening doing what he loved most, said his son, Brian Dykstra.
He joined his family at Russ's Restaurant in Holland, where his granddaughter works. He made sure she waited on the family, he said.
Then, it was onto his son's home in Hudsonville for more family time.
"He wouldn't miss that," said his cousin, Marilyn Dykstra.
Just before 10 p.m., he was headed home on a road he had taken often -- Wilson Avenue SW, near Johnson Park in Walker.
"He was just minding his own business," said his cousin, John Dykstra, who also lives next door to the victim. "He's just driving home and here comes a guy over the hill."
Records show a motorist watched as Garcia-Miron swerved "continuously" on southbound Wilson Avenue SW, just before crossing into Dykstra's northbound lane.
When police arrived, Garcia-Miron smelled strongly of alcohol and appeared off-balance, police wrote in an affidavit.
His driving record lists five moving violations since 2004, including speeding and running a stop sign, according to the Secretary of State.
Why wasn't the obviously dangerous foreigner checked for his immigration status and deported? Sadly, this tragic death of a beloved grandfather could have been prevented by proper functioning of law enforcement.
Almost one in six people in the U.S. workforce in 2007 was foreign-born, the highest portion in at least 80 years, an analysis from the Census Bureau showed.
Immigration policies had cut the size of the foreign-born labor force from about 19 percent of workers in 1920 to 5.2 percent in 1970, the agency said in the report yesterday. Policy changes starting in the 1960s have led to a "new wave of immigration," pushing the current level to about 16 percent, according to the report.
Economic opportunity is a primary attraction for many immigrants to the U.S., and there are a greater number of foreign-born workers in the country than ever, the agency said in the report. Every industry group in the economy employs such workers, the agency said.
The foreign-born participated in the labor force at a higher rate than the native-born, the analysis showed.
Foreign-born workers were more likely to be male than native-born workers, more often less educated, and included higher proportions of workers in their late twenties and early thirties, the report said.
The chart below is from the Census paper. See the original for footnotes.
Struggles of the second generation
[12/08/09]
The Washington Post had a rather serious article about the demographic changes facing the country. It features a former gangster, son of illegals, who dropped out of high school and is trying to make something of his life. His prospects don't look promising -- like millions of others on a one-way trip to the permanent hispanic underclass.
There are statistics included to make sense of the dire demography.
Largely because of the growth of this second generation, Latino immigrants and their U.S.-born children and grandchildren will represent almost a third of the nation's working-age adults by mid-century, according to projections from U.S. Census Bureau data by Jeffrey S. Passel, a demographer with the nonpartisan Pew Hispanic Center in Washington.
Not since the last great wave of immigration to the United States around 1900 has the country's economic future been so closely entwined with the generational progress of an immigrant group. And so far, on nearly every measure, the news is troubling.
Second-generation Latinos have the highest high school dropout rate -- one in seven -- of any U.S.-born racial or ethnic group and the highest teen pregnancy rate. These Latinos also receive far fewer college degrees and make significantly less money than non-Hispanic whites and other second-generation immigrants. Their struggles have fueled an outcry for stricter immigration laws, with advocates saying that the rapid increase in Latino immigrants and their children has strained the United States' resources and social fabric.
"The last 30 years of immigration have made our country more unequal, poorer than we would have been otherwise, more fractious and less cohesive," said Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies in Washington, which favors tighter restrictions on immigration.
The graphs are sobering, particularly this one that shows the cultural divide between hispanic underachievers and other immigrants (like Asians, who arrive and attend the same schools but are successful):
Binghamton Student Says He Warned Officials
[12/07/09]
A 46-year-old Saudi graduate student, Abdulsalam Al-Zahrani, stabbed a retired professor to death on Friday, and there are many questions to be answered. One is whether university officials ignored warning signs about violence because of political correctness (as apparently happened in the Virginia Tech massacre of dozens, where the killer was cut endless slack even after arson and stalking young women).
VESTAL, N.Y. - In this small upstate college town, there were many who tried to comprehend how a popular 77-year-old professor who championed antiwar philosophies would have come to such a violent end: stabbed to death in his office on Friday, by, the police said, a graduate student whom he knew.
Then there were those who said they had noticed signs of erratic behavior by the suspect, a graduate student at Binghamton University, who, they said, was becoming increasingly fearful - so much so that his roommate said he had warned university officials of his concerns.
The suspect, Abdulsalam S. al-Zahrani, 46, remained held without bail on Sunday, charged with second-degree murder in the death of the professor, Richard T. Antoun.
The two knew each other through Binghamton's graduate program, where the professor served on the dissertation committee for Mr. Zahrani, who is from Saudi Arabia.
On Sunday, Mr. Zahrani's roommates - who had lived with him for about three weeks in a three-bedroom apartment in downtown Binghamton - recounted how the suspect, who spoke of financial problems, often mentioned death and said he was being persecuted because he was Muslim.
"I said he was acting oddly, like a terrorist," said one of the roommates, Souleymane Sakho, a graduate student from Senegal. "When I informed them, it was for them to understand that the guy was violent or he may be violent."
Also, you have to wonder whether the killer was one of George Bush's 20,000 Saudi students (I can't find a date for Zahrani's enrollment.) At the time, I warned that Bush's ill considered poicy would endanger Americans for a silly idea, that exposing Saudis to American culture would make them less hostile. BS.
Remember that many of the 9/11 hijackers had plenty of exposure to the West, e.g. leader Mohamed Atta, who had studied architecture at a German university, and Ziad Jarrah, who attended a Catholic school in Lebanon. The power of the dark side is strong.
U.S. sees homegrown Muslim extremism as rising threat
[12/07/09] For years, the pro-immigration cheerleaders insisted that America did immigrant assimilation better than Europe, so there was no reason to fear Muslim immigrants turning into bombers. However, recent events have made that fable difficult to maintain, e.g. the Fort Hood Islam-inspired mass murder, the dozens of Somali residents returning home to wage jihad, and the arrests of Qaeda-connected terrorists (e.g. Najibullah Zazi).
There has definitely been an uptick in the last year; do bad guys see the weak, Islam-friendly President as a sign to go ahead?
Europe had been the front line, the target of successive attacks and major plots, while the U.S. remained relatively calm. But the number, variety and scale of recent U.S. cases suggest 2009 has been the most dangerous year domestically since 2001, anti-terrorism experts said:
There were major arrests of Americans accused of plotting with Al Qaeda and its allies, including an Afghan American charged in a New York bomb plot described as the most serious threat in this country since the Sept. 11 attacks.
Authorities tracked other extremism suspects joining foreign networks, including Somali Americans going to the battlegrounds of their ancestral homeland and an Albanian American from Brooklyn who was arrested in Kosovo.
The FBI rounded up homegrown terrorism suspects in Dallas, Detroit and Raleigh, N.C., saying that it had broken up plots targeting a synagogue, government buildings and military facilities.
Last week, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano issued her strongest public comments yet on the homegrown threat.
"We've seen an increased number of arrests here in the U.S. of individuals suspected of plotting terrorist attacks, or supporting terror groups abroad such as Al Qaeda," Napolitano said in a speech in New York. "Home-based terrorism is here. And, like violent extremism abroad, it will be part of the threat picture that we must now confront."
Other quotes are surprisingly truthful as well:
"You are seeing the full spectrum of the threats you face in terrorism," former Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said.
"Radicalization is clearly happening in the U.S.," said Mitchell Silber, director of analysis for the Intelligence Division of the New York Police Department. "In years past, you couldn't say that about the U.S. You could say it about Europe." [...]
"People focused on the idea that we're different, we're better at integrating Muslims than Europe is," said Zeyno Baran, a scholar at the Hudson Institute, a think tank in Washington. "But there's radicalization -- especially among converts [and] newcomers, such as the Somali case shows. I think young U.S. Muslims today are as prone to radicalization as Muslims in Europe." [...]
"You can be middle-class and have bright prospects but become a jihadist," [scholar Farhad Khosrokhavar] said. "We have to broaden the analysis. This idea of American exceptionalism, the comparison with Europe, should not blind us to the fact that we are going toward a broader participation in jihad."
However, the sensible idea of ending Muslim immigration does not appear.
A bull-killing ritual can go ahead on Saturday after a court ruled against an animal rights group which tried to have the practice banned in South Africa.
The bull is killed during the Ukushwama ritual, an annual thanksgiving event in Kwa-Zulu Natal, in which youngsters kill the animal using their hands.
Animal Rights Africa took the Zulu king and the government to court over the manner in which the bull is killed. [...]
ARA claimed that the killing took some 40 minutes and involved dozens of men trampling on the beast as they tried to break its neck.
The organisation described the killing as "cruel and protracted".
"Animal sacrifice is a vital part of life for many South Africans"
This was the week in which FIFA chief Sepp Blatter laughed at poor old Ireland, Avram Grant was likened to Yoda, Manchester City were rebranded as Manchester United, Arsene Wenger spat the dummy and South Africa proposed to slaughter a cow at every World Cup venue.
How welcoming of the South Africans to share local customs with visitors. After all, soccer is arguably the most diverse sport -- it is played around the world with great passion, as shown by a recent ruckus in France: Angry Algerians Rumble in Marseille over Cairo Soccer Loss.
Mixteco-speaking immigrants struggle to make a life near Othello
[12/06/09]
This article from Washington state may reveal more than the reporter intended about the cultural chasm between some "immigrants" and our own society. Also, they come to America for the money only.
How diverse are Mixtecs? Many don't speak Spanish which indicates they were not assimilated to the majority culture of their home country. This group is another addition to the permanent immigrant underclass of Mexicans, whose rejection of education assimilation (even several generations along) assures their lack of success.
Oh, and there's no mention in the article of the Mixtecs' immigration status. Are we supposed to assume lawfulness? It would make no sense given the history of this tribe and Mexicans generally.
OTHELLO, Wash. -- In a bleak housing project west of this small rural town, the Mexican farm workers living here murmur to each other in a dialect many of them don't want their children to learn.
It's called Mixteco, one of the dozens of dialects spoken by Latin America's indigenous people.
For these immigrants, Spanish is a second language. Many don't speak it.
"I want my children to learn Spanish," said Isabel Reyes, a 31-year-old who speaks to them in broken Spanish. "And English. I want them to go to school and get good jobs so they don't have to work in the fields like we do."
Nice priorities -- Spanish, then English. For the money, not to join the American community.
Indigenous people like her are the Native Americans of Mexico and Central America.
They have been coming to the United States for as long as Mexicans have been immigrating here -- although in dramatically higher numbers over the past three decades.
Nationwide, the federal government estimates that 17 percent of farm workers are indigenous.
They first arrived in California -- at least 500,000 indigenous Mexicans still live there -- and slowly migrated north into Oregon and Washington, following other Mexican immigrants to jobs in agriculture and restaurants.
Now, their migration has brought them over the Cascades and into Eastern Washington, mostly to Othello, Quincy and Mattawa.
Only a few dozen Mixteco-speaking immigrants live in the Yakima Valley.
Ê
Othello, with a population of about 5,800, is home to the state's highest concentration of Mixtecos.
As many as 800 people from the highlands of southern Mexico live here -- often in cold, cramped duplexes and mobile homes outside of the city's quiet downtown.
Some of these Mexican tribal people are quite diveerse, as I learned when researching the case of the illegal alien father residing in central California who sold his 14-year-old daughter for a stash of beer and other beverages. He is a member of the Triqui tribe, which has other colorful marriage practices, including kidnapping and polygamy ("Grapes of Wrath' south of the border)...
Indians have brought with them a number of traditions that grated against life outside Oaxaca. One of them was courting. Indian courting can look a lot like kidnapping and statutory rape. Men take wives, literally. Sometimes they run off with them. Sometimes the wives are well under 18. Arranged marriages are common. Triquis are known to practice polygamy and sometimes to sell wives.
Now how is it we are supposed to benefit from this diversity???
9/11 families rally against NYC terror trials
[12/05/09]
A spirited demonstration was held Saturday in New York City to protest the Attorney General's decision to hold a civil trial there rather than go with the military tribunals that Congress created for that purpose.
Several hundred people rallied in the rain near Manhattan's federal courthouse complex today to protest the plan to put major terrorism suspects on trial in New York City.
Demonstrators at the Saturday event included the actor Brian Dennehy and a number of people who lost friends and relatives in the 9/11 attacks.
Anger at the Obama administration ran hot in the crowd. One person held up a sign calling Attorney General Eric Holder "disgraceful and despicable." Another sign said "Obama/Holder ... Jihad from within."
Opponents of the plan say that a New York trial could again make the city a terrorism target, and that the five suspects should instead face a military tribunal.
To see a great bunch of photos of the event, check out Urban Infidel. Below is a short video from the same source.
Prison for driver who killed girl
[12/05/09]
The illegal alien whose reckless driving caused the death of four-year-old Josie Bluhm (pictured) was sentenced on Friday. The good news is that Eleazar Rangel-Ochoa got the maximum prison term; the bad news is that it's only six years.
He crashed into the Bluhm vehicle after he ran a red light driving with no license on the way to the job he held unlawfully. He had been arrested three times for drunk driving but was not deported.
A solemn Douglas County District Judge J Russell Derr sentenced Rangel-Ochoa to 32 months to six years years in prison Ð the maximum sentence for misdemeanor motor-vehicle homicide and for felony driving while he was suspended.
Rangel-Ochoa, 27, ran a red light about 7:30 a.m. May 12 Ð crashing a truck into a van driven by Jayme Bluhm and carrying the Bluhms' three children.
Josie's father, Kyle, and mother, Jayme, tearfully talked about their bubbly daughter. With her blonde-hair and a button nose, their middle child had an infectious personality.
Jayme Bluhm had been headed to day care to drop off her children, then ages 5, 4 and 1. The collision ejected Josie, 4, and caused her death.
Josie's then-5-year-old brother and best friend, Cayden, suffered six broken bones in the crash.
Rangel-Ochoa, an illegal immigrant, had lost his license for 15 years after his third drunken-driving conviction in 2003.
He wasn't drunk on May 12 Ð hence the misdemeanor motor-vehicle homicide charge.
The case sparked concern about why Rangel-Ochoa hadn't been deported after his 2003 conviction. His previous attorney has said that immigration officials now are more stringent and that Rangel-Ochoa wouldn't be treated with such leniency today. He likely will face deportation after he serves his sentence.
Josie's parents, Kyle and Jayme Bluhm (above), spoke about the heartache of losing their beloved little girl, like setting the table for four instead of five. Josie had thought she wanted to be a teacher like her dad, but all those plans for the future are gone now.
President Barack Obama is not facing more threats to his life or security than the previous two presidents, according to the Secret Service.
At a hearing Thursday, Secret Service Director Mark Sullivan said "the threats right now in the inappropriate interest that we are seeing is the same level as it has been for the previous two presidents at this point."
Helping Mexico Help Itself
[12/04/09]
This largely good article is a reminder that otherwise intelligent people can recognize the symptoms of a problem, but still don't understand how the size and stubborn intractability of culture means that easy solutions are not possible.
Mexico's problems have not changed much in 500 years. The country has never managed to organize itself into a liberal democracy founded on the habit of inquiry, an engaged citizenry, and the rule of law. Its people endured centuries of domination as a colony of Spain, decades of war and tyranny after independence, and a decade-long revolution, begun in 1910, that killed 2 million people and replaced one autocracy with another. For the rest of the century, power was concentrated in an immense political corporationÑthe Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI)Ñand in a succession of presidents who ruled like kings. Even the PRI's defeat in 2000 by Vicente Fox and the conservative National Action Party (PAN) has not brought much democracy: its main effect has been to weaken the presidency and to set off a free-for-all among political parties, state governments, and the big unions, bureaucracies, and businesses that control them. Unchecked by executive power, these institutions are authoritarian, averse to change, and corrupt; Mexicans joke that theirs is the first country in history to move from monarchy backward to feudalism.
That's a pretty damning assessment of 500 years of Mexican history, and the writer continues at length in this vein about failing politics, the worst educated students, hopelessly overregulated business, growing drug addiction,
continuing cartel violence, general fear of crime, etc.
Yet author Shepard Barbash (a Houston Chronicle reporter) thinks that more partnership would be a swell thing for the Mexes, and would make them less troublesome for us. That's not much of a payoff for our investment, which has no assurance of success. (Calderon's war against the cartels is not going that well despite Washington's generosity in helping.)
More broadly, the best way to strengthen Mexico and ease the pressure of illegal immigration is to stimulate free trade and investment to promote the continent's competitiveness. The goal should be to create regional mechanisms like NAFTA that are accountable to each country's people but that strengthen Mexico's institutions in a range of areas, including economic regulation, competition, and monetary policy.
America should also continue to help Mexico fight the drug cartels. Calderon has won support from the U.S. Congress, which last year approved $1.4 billion in security aid for Mexico, and from President Obama, who has stepped up efforts to interdict illegal weapons and cash flowing into Mexico from the U.S.
We could increase support, too, for Calderon's effort to build a competent national police force. The U.S. Agency for International Development, which has given grants that are stimulating judicial reforms in Chihuahua and other states, might fund efforts to improve how states and municipalities screen, train, deploy, monitor, and reward their security forces. We might also consider funding border cities or states to work with their neighbors in the U.S. to prevent smuggling, illegal immigration, and crime.
Why do these brilliant solutions to Mexico's problems always involve large expenditures of American tax money? Mexico is rich (now ranking #13 in the world for GDP) and could easily invest in its own development, but has become accustomed to receiving the benificence of Uncle Sucker. Why should they change, particularly now with spendaholics installed in Washington?
Despite many efforts to help a malajusted neighbor, America should realize its geography is unlucky, situated as it is next door to the new narco-hub of the Western Hemisphere. Any money expended concerning Mexico should be for a bigger wall and more border enforcement.
If President Barack Obama could snap his fingers and create 8 million new jobs, would you want him to do it? I would. And certainly the 15 million unemployed Americans would, as well. The good news is that the president can do just that - implement a policy that opens up 8 million jobs.ÊThe bad news is that he won't.
Four weeks ago, after the administration announced that the unemployment rate had hit 10.2 percent and 190,000 jobs were lost in October alone, 21 of my colleagues and I wrote to the president to recommend enforcing current immigration laws to open up jobs for citizens and legal immigrants.ÊThe White House has yet to respond.
And this week, notably absent from the president's jobs summit is any discussion of how to take back the 8 million jobs currently occupied by illegal immigrants and make them available to out-of-work U.S. citizens and legal immigrants. Instead, the Obama administration has taken the opposite approach to the stolen-jobs problem.ÊRather than ensuring that American jobs are reserved for legal workers, the administration continues to pursue amnesty.ÊBut legalizing 11 million illegal immigrants will only further harm American workers, making it harder for citizens and legal immigrants to get and keep long-term jobs.ÊÊ
Meanwhile, the President is holding a mega-PR stunt, er, job summit today, with no spokespersons for this viewpoint. In the interests of fair and balanced, there's no indication that the alternative Republican meeting will consider busting the millions of illegal alien job thieves either.
Rep. Steve King made a statement supporting enforcement at the recent "American Jobs in Peril" forum (transcript).
Steve Camarota is the research wizard at CIS and presented a large selection of statistics about employment.
There are other videos of statements from the November 26 hearing at CIS's YouTube channel -- lots of good stuff.
1. Indonesia. In a state with large minority populations of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, and animists, the US State department reported in 2009 that at least 9 churches Ð and 12 mosques associated with the Ahmadiyya Islamic sect (which mainstream Muslim groups consider heretical) Ð were forced shut by violence or intimidation from community groups, and that a number of churches and Hindu temples have struggled to receive official permits in recent years. The Indonesian government has on a number of occasions stepped in to prevent church construction, largely over fears that it would stoke sectarian violence. But religious practice, by and large, is freer in Indonesia than most other Muslim majority states.
2. Egypt. The country has a sizeable minority of Eastern Orthodox Christians, or Copts. By law, their churches must receive the permission of local Muslim communities before new construction is allowed. The State Department's religious freedom report on Egypt in 2009 says in part: "Church and human rights leaders complain that many local officials intentionally delay the permit process. They charge that some local authorities refuse to process applications without 'supporting documents' that are virtually impossible to obtain."
A majority of Swiss voters obviously feels that there are problems with Muslim integration into civil society at the moment. This vague sentiment was fueled by a number of incidents over the last years: The former Imam of a mosque in Geneva, Hani Ramadan, a Swiss citizen by the way, publicly justified the stoning of adulterers or the punitive amputation of the hand of a thief. Muslim parents prevented their daughters from attending swimming classes, gymnastics or summer camps in public schools because they didn't want their girls to be together with boys. Media reports about forced marriages, female genital mutilations and "honor killings" of Muslim women - all confirmed by authorities or in court -- came as a shocking surprise. A university professor even went as far as to suggest in an official publication of a federal commission to introduce elements of the Sharia, the Muslim legal system, into Switzerland. [...]
It would be utterly wrong -- and dangerous -- to think that this was primarily a racist vote. I'm convinced that the post-electoral analysis will show that a significant part of the (anti-racist) left and an overwhelming majority of the women supported the ban -- not because they are afraid of minarets, but because they are worried about the role (some would say: about the oppression) of women in Islamic societies and about the role of religion in public life. This is, in my opinion, an entirely legitimate discussion that we have to have and must not suppress.
It's a promising sign that European women are rejecting kumbaya propaganda about diversity and recognizing the danger that political Islam represents. Burqas are chains.
Black Market Butchers Continue Killing Pet Horses
[12/01/09] Several arrests have been made since September for the horribly brutal slaughter of horses in south Florida to feed the diverse tastes of immigrants. But the incarceration of a few won't stop this crime: there is too much money to be made for killing a family's pet horse and selling the meat.
In fact, blackmarket horse meat is increasing in value, perhaps because of the crackdown. In July, the black-market price was reported to be $7-$20 per pound (Horse slaughters have Miami-area owners on edge), and now the street value is $40 for that amount, meaning an entire animal can bring $8000 for a night's cruelty.
[SPCA investigator Richard] Couto said it's a third world custom, where horse meat is not only a delicacy but a magic elixir.
"They think that horse meat is a cure-all, that it's going to cure blood disorders," said Couto. "It's going to cure AIDS -- that it helps with the side effects from chemotherapy." [...]
"My horse was tied to a palm tree," said Ivonne Rodriguez. "His throat was slit, OK? And he wasn't dead when they were taking meat off his body."
Ivonne Rodriguez wants justice for Geronimo. Four people have been arrested so far.
Santiago Cabrera and Luis Miguel Cordero admitted they sat on the horses and held their mouths closed while they butchered them alive.
One of the admirable facets of Western civilization that is little appreciated by its inhabitants is the abhorrence toward animal cruelty, a cultural value that is not shared in much of the world.
In some places, gratuitous brutality is regarded as fun or sporting, as in parts of China and the Philippines where bloody horse-fighting is popular. Animals that are injured are often butchered and barbecued for the crowd.
In Mexico, horse meat is commonly eaten, and Mexican slaughterhouses are known for their cruel methods of dispatching the animals.
For more about diverse harm toward innocent creatures, see my 2006 article Diversity Is Strength! It's Also... Cruelty To Animals
Obama aunt anguished by separation
[12/01/09] The President's illegal alien aunt is back, complaining now about her distraught emotional state while she continues to live rather well on the backs of the taxpayers. Zeituni Onyango lives in comfortable subsidized housing in Boston and dresses quite nicely for a welfare case. She is also an alien absconder who was ordered deported but failed to leave.
She grumbles about being cut off from her only American relatives -- the ones who reside in the White House -- although she has plenty of family back home in Kenya. (Polygamy does spawn lots of kinfolk.)
Onyango, the half sister of Obama's late father, said she has exiled herself from the family after attending Obama's inauguration because she didn't want to become fodder for his foes. Obama and his family have not reached out to her either, she said.
"Before, we were family. But right now, there is a lot of politics, and me, I am not interested in any politics at all," said Onyango, whose appeal for asylum from her native Kenya is before an immigration judge in Boston.
The Obamas are her only family in the United States, she said.
"It is very sad when such a thing happens. There are people, outsiders, you know, they come in between, they divide a family," she said last week. "It's not easy."
Onyango, 57, is protective of Obama and said she never asked him to intervene in her case and didn't tell him about her immigration difficulties.
She does't have to beg for more goodies from her nephew: the system is already abuser-friendly. The judge knows who she is and doesn't want any mysterious trouble. That's why he postponed her asylum hearing until February, probably hoping that something would turn up to rescue him.
Plus, Auntie Mooch lives in Massachusetts, where one of the President's pals is governor. Deval Patrick is not about to cut the woman's benefits.
Onyango helped care for the president's half brothers and sister while living with Barack Obama Sr. in Kenya. She moved to the United States in 2000 and applied for asylum in 2002, but her request was rejected and she was ordered deported in 2004.
However, she did not leave the country and continued to live in public housing in Boston. She had been a health care volunteer but not since her status became public. She refused to discuss how she affords to live now or who is paying for her attorney. [...]
Her attorney, Margaret Wong, said Onyango first applied for asylum because of violence in Kenya, an East African nation fractured by cycles of electoral violence every five years. People who seek asylum must show that they face persecution in their homeland on the basis of religion, race, nationality, political opinion or membership in a social group.
Immigration experts say Onyango's relationship to the president could strengthen her claim that she would be subjected to danger at home.
Ridiculous. None of the President's many African relatives have had any difficulties at all. In fact, their celebrity is rewarded; for instance Obie's grandmother was recently invited to celebrate the hajj in Mecca.
Aunt Zeituni put out some sniffles for her AP interview, below...